Skip to content

· Private foundation

Olivieri Johnston Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$97k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$104kInternational$92kEnvironment$68kCivil Rights$46kHealth$44kEducation$28kHuman Services$21kAnimals$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k25 grants · $77k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$2,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION INC$10,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA INC$10,000
NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR WOMEN & FAMILIES INC$8,000
CHURCH OF THE REGENERATION$6,000
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC$6,000
MONDOWEISS (CENTER FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH AND SOCIAL CHANGE)$5,000
ASPCA$4,000
HOUSE OF THE REDEEMER$4,000
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY (CELIAC DISEASE CENTER)$4,000
UNITED PALESTINIAN APPEAL$4,000
EXCELLENCE PLUS INCORPORATED$3,000
RISING GROUND (LEAKE & WATTS SERVICES)$3,000
CHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND$2,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC$2,000
BARD COLLEGE (PRISON INITIATIVE)$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%RISING GROUND (LEAKE & WATTS SERVICES): $3k → 20%RISING GROUND (LEAKE & WATTS SERVICES): $3k → 20%RISING GROUND (LEAKE & WATTS SERVICES): $3k → 20%RISING GROUND (LEAKE & WATTS SERVICES): $3k → 20%RISING GROUND (LEAKE & WATTS SERVICES): $3k → 20%RISING GROUND (LEAKE & WATTS SERVICES): $2k → 20%HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC: $2k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $2k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $1k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
DC
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$448k · 29 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
10

Total granted

$448k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+19%

Still filing today

76%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentEducationHealthInternationalHuman ServicesCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $38k · revenue +39%
  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $33k · revenue +14%
  • WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $26k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • M(
    MONDOWEISS (CENTER FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH ADN SOCIAL CHANGE)
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • CC
    Cancer Care Co-Payment Assistance Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue -43%
  • WI
    WOMEN IN NEED INC
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
3
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
4
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
5
Third Way

To research and develop centrist policy ideas.

Civil Rights
6
Conservation Law Foundation Inc

Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…

Environment
7
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
8
Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy

Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.

Food & Nutrition
9
Climate Institute

The climate institute is organized for the purpose of educating the general public and policy makers as to the gravity of potential climate change, exploring the policy implications of the latest scientific findings on climate modelling…

Environment
10
Property and Environment Research Center

Perc is dedicated to advancing conservation through markets, incentives, property rights, and partnerships.

Public Benefit
11
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
12
The Climate Group Inc

Climate group advances climate action by mobilizing business and government leadership to drive systemic decarbonization across energy, transport, and industry, while engaging the public through large-scale convenings and global platforms.…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save the Children Federation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
19/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHURCH OF THE REGENERATION: $44,000 · OtherCHURCH OF THE REGENERATIONMONDOWEISS: $40,000 · OtherMONDOWEISSNATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES: $24,000 · OtherNATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIESCOLUMBIA UNIVERSITY (CELIAC DISEASE CENTER): $21,000 · OtherCOLUMBIA UNIVERSITY (CELIAC DISEASE CENTER)EXCELLENCE PLUS INCORPORATED: $15,000 · OtherEXCELLENCE PLUS INCORPORATEDUNITED STATES ASSOCIATION FOR UNHCR THE UN REFUGEE AGENCY: $15,000 · OtherUNITED STATES ASSOCIATION FOR UNHCR THE UN REFUGEE AGENCYNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC (CONSTITUTION MARSH): $10,000 · OtherMONDOWEISS (CENTER FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH ADN SOCIAL CHANGE): $10,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND: $12,000 · OtherSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $10,000 · OtherWEST SIDE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LIFE: $9,000 · Other+10 more: $39,000 · Other+10 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $38,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRON…Save The Children Federation Inc: $33,000 · InternationalSave The Children …UNITED PALESTINIAN APPEAL INC: $6,000 · InternationalUNITED PALESTINIAN…WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $26,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE …COLUMBIA LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $14,000 · EnvironmentCOLUMBIA LAND C…Scenic Hudson Inc: $12,000 · EnvironmentScenic Hudson I…OCEAN CONSERVANCY: $9,000 · EnvironmentOCEAN CONSERVAN…SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $6,000 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLUB FOU…+1 more: $1,000 · EnvironmentTHE GO PROJECT INC: $11,000 · EducationNEW YORK INSTITUTE FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION: $11,000 · EducationWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $1,000 · EducationTHE NEW YORK OPPORTUNITY NETWORK INC DBA THE OPPORTUNITY NETWORK: $1,000 · EducationRISING GROUND INC: $17,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN IN NEED INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $12,000 · HealthALPHA-1 FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · HealthCancer Care Co-Payment Assistance Foundation Inc: $2,000 · HealthCHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION: $2,000 · HealthHOUSE OF THE REDEEMER: $20,000 · Religion
Other$249,000International$77,000Environment$68,000Education$24,000Human Services$23,000Health$21,000Religion$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $38,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $33,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $26,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES: $24,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHOUSE OF THE REDEEMER: $20,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetRISING GROUND INC: $17,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBIA LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $14,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetScenic Hudson Inc: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GO PROJECT INC: $11,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetNEW YORK INSTITUTE FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION: $11,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWEST SIDE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LIFE: $9,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $9,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED PALESTINIAN APPEAL INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALPHA-1 FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFIRELIGHT MEDIA INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN IN NEED INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCancer Care Co-Payment Assistance Foundation Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEW YORK OPPORTUNITY NETWORK INC DBA THE OPPORTUNITY NETWORK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF THE REDEEMER ↗
  • Who funds RISING GROUND INC ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBIA LAND CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND ↗
  • Who funds Scenic Hudson Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE GO PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK INSTITUTE FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST SIDE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LIFE ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds UNITED PALESTINIAN APPEAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALPHA-1 FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FIRELIGHT MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY YEAR INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN IN NEED INC ↗
  • Who funds Cancer Care Co-Payment Assistance Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco FoundationCA12.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Olivieri Johnston Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Olivieri Johnston Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Olivieri Johnston Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph