Skip to content

· Private foundation

Oliver & Ferrol Barklage Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$305k
Granted FY2022
34
Grants FY2022
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Human Services$298kHealth$291kYouth Development$184kHousing & Shelter$176kReligion$104kFood & Nutrition$64kEducation$61kCrime & Legal$38kOther$0
02FY2022 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k9 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k25 grants · $250k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE$10,000
HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICES$10,000
ONE WORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH$10,000
GIRLS INC$10,000
KOUNTZE MEMORIAL LUTHERAN CHURCH$10,000
SHARE A FARE INC$10,000
HEARTLAND HOPE MISSION$10,000
STEPHEN CENTER$10,000
YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES$10,000
METRO AREA YOUTH FOUNDATION$10,000
DOUGLAS COUNTY NEBRASKA CASA$10,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$10,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE MIDLANDS$10,000
COMPLETELY KIDS$10,000
SHRINERS HOSPITAL$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $353k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MASONIC-EASTERN STAR HOME FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 11%KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 12%MASONIC-EASTERN STAR HOME FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 11%KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 12%SHARE A FARE INC: $10k → 12%KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 12%KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $4k → 12%SHARE A FARE INC: $6k → 12%KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $4k → 12%SHARE A FARE INC: $6k → 12%OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $10k → 12%OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $10k → 12%OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $10k → 12%OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $8k → 12%OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $8k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE: $10k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE: $10k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE: $10k → 12%CHILD SAVINGS INSTITUTE: $10k → 12%CHILD SAVINGS INSTITUTE: $8k → 12%YMCA OF GREATER OMAHA: $6k → 12%YMCA OF GREATER OMAHA: $6k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 12%YOUTH CARE & BEYOND: $10k → 12%YOUTH CARE & BEYOND: $8k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 12%YOUTH CARE AND BEYOND: $8k → 12%YOUTH CARE AND BEYOND: $8k → 12%YOUTH CARE AND BEYOND: $8k → 12%SHARE A FARE INC: $5k → 12%SHARE A FARE INC: $4k → 12%SHARE A FARE INC: $4k → 12%YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES: $10k → 12%YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES: $10k → 12%YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES: $10k → 12%WOMENS CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $8k → 12%YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES: $8k → 12%WOMENS CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $8k → 12%YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES: $8k → 12%HEARTLAND HOPE MISSION: $10k → 12%HEARTLAND HOPE MISSION: $10k → 12%HEARTLAND HOPE MISSION: $10k → 12%HEARTLAND HOPE MISSION: $10k → 12%HEARTLAND HOPE MISSION: $8k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 43 repeat orgs$109k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

43 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2022, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
12

Total granted

$1.2M
$82k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+24%

Still filing today

70%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterEducationCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CK
    COMPLETELY KIDS
    6× · 2017–2022 · $56k · revenue +64%
  • NF
    NORTHSTAR FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $50k · revenue +82%
  • HH
    HEARTLAND HOPE MISSION
    5× · 2018–2022 · $48k · revenue +470%

Funded once

  • TN
    THE NEBRASKA MASONIC HOME FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +7%
  • AA
    ANGELS AMONG USgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +153%
  • IS
    IOWA SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF & BLIND
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
One Omaha

One omaha empowers people where they live with education, training, and engagement to develop thriving neighborhoods.

Community Improvement
2
Share Omaha

Our mission is to help nonprofits fulfill theirs.

Philanthropy
3
Nebraska Youth Center

The center operates a group home for troubled youth, ages 12-18, in western nebraska.

—
4
Friendship Home of Lincoln Inc

To provide emergency shelter

Human Services
5
Prairie Harvest Mental Health

We promote independence and an enhanced quality of life for adults with serious mental illness.

Human Services
6
Hope Haven Inc

As followers of christ, hope haven's mission is to empower individuals with disabilities through work and life skills so that they may enjoy a productive life in their community.

—
7
Omaha 100

Our mission is to provide ownership opportunities through public and private partnerships, financing, and technical assistance. by working collaboratively, we aim to expand access to capital in underserved communities, empowering…

Housing & Shelter
8
Nebraska Children & Families Foundation

Nebraska children's mission is to create positive change for children through community engagement. our vision is a nebraska where all children will have the resources and support to reach their full potential. our values are (1)…

Philanthropy
9
Family Promise of Greater Des Moines

To provide shelter and services to families experiencing homelessness

—
10
Voices for Children in Nebraska

Voices for children in nebraska is the independent voice building pathways to opportunity for all children and families through research, policy and community engagement.

—
11
Midwest Women and Children's Services

To provide education and support services to women and children in nebraska and western iowa.

—
12
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Easter Seals Nebraska; the most unlike its peers is Restoring Dignity Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/40
Grantees still filing
30/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ONE WORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH: $56,000 · OtherONE WORLD COMMUNITY HEALTHSIENNAFRANCIS HOUSE HOMELESS SHELTER: $44,000 · OtherSIENNAFRANCIS HOUSE HOMELESS SHELTERSHRINERS HOSPITAL: $40,000 · OtherSHRINERS HOSPITALRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $37,500 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSEHOLY FAMILY CHURCH: $36,000 · OtherHOLY FAMILY CHURCHDOUGLAS COUNTY NEBRASKA CASA: $30,000 · OtherDOUGLAS COUNTY NEBRASKA CASAKOUNTZE MEMORIAL LUTHERAN CHURCH: $30,000 · OtherKOUNTZE MEMORIAL LUTHERAN CHURCHNEBRASKA LUTHERAN OUTDOOR MINISTRIES: $28,000 · OtherNEBRASKA LUTHERAN OUTDOOR MINISTRIESNEBRASKA CHILDRENS HOME: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · Other+17 more: $143,450 · Other+17 moreHEARTLAND HOPE MISSION: $48,000 · Human ServicesHEARTLAND HOPE MISSIONCHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC: $48,000 · Human ServicesCHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INCYOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES INC: $46,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES INCTHE OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $46,000 · Human ServicesTHE OMAHA HOME FOR BOYSYouth Care Inc: $40,334 · Human ServicesYouth Care IncSHARE A FARE INC: $34,000 · Human ServicesSHARE A FARE INCKIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $28,000 · Human ServicesKIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTERHEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $20,000 · Human ServicesHEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICEWOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $16,000 · Human ServicesMASONIC-EASTERN STAR HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesYMCA OF GREATER OMAHA: $12,000 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesCOMPLETELY KIDS: $56,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOMPLETELY KIDSGIRLS INCORPORATED OF OMAHA: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS INCORPORA…NORTHSTAR FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentNORTHSTAR FOUND…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE MIDLANDS: $27,500 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CL…RADIO TALKING BOOK SERVICE INC: $47,000 · HealthRADIO TALKI…HEALING GIFT FREE CLINIC: $20,000 · HealthHEALING GIF…OLLIE WEBB CENTER INC: $20,000 · HealthOLLIE WEBB …EASTER SEALS NEBRASKA: $14,000 · HealthEASTER SEAL…THE NEBRASKA MASONIC HOME FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthTHE NEBRASK…ANGELS AMONG US: $10,000 · HealthANGELS AMON…CORNBELT DIABETES CONNECTION INC: $10,000 · HealthCORNBELT DI…NEBRASKA METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $8,000 · HealthNEBRASKA ME…MICAH HOUSE CORPORATION: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterSTEPHEN CENTER INC: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterSHELTERING TREE INC: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE: $16,000 · Housing & ShelterOMAHA STREET SCHOOL: $28,000 · EducationDIBS for Kids: $11,000 · EducationMETRO AREA YOUTH FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Philanthropy
Other$484,950Human Services$358,334Youth Development$183,500Health$139,000Housing & Shelter$81,000Education$39,000Philanthropy$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMPLETELY KIDS: $56,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF OMAHA: $50,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetNORTHSTAR FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetHEARTLAND HOPE MISSION: $48,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC: $48,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetRADIO TALKING BOOK SERVICE INC: $47,000 over 6y, 3.9% of budgetYOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES INC: $46,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTHE OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $46,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetYouth Care Inc: $40,334 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetSHARE A FARE INC: $34,000 over 6y, 27% of budgetMETRO AREA YOUTH FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 6.8% of budgetNEBRASKA LUTHERAN OUTDOOR MINISTRIES: $28,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetKIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $28,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetOMAHA STREET SCHOOL: $28,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE MIDLANDS: $27,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMICAH HOUSE CORPORATION: $25,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHEALING GIFT FREE CLINIC: $20,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetSTEPHEN CENTER INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOLLIE WEBB CENTER INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSHELTERING TREE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetWOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $16,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE: $16,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMASONIC-EASTERN STAR HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetProject Kindle: $14,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetEASTER SEALS NEBRASKA: $14,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetYMCA OF GREATER OMAHA: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDIBS for Kids: $11,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetTHE NEBRASKA MASONIC HOME FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetANGELS AMONG US: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCORNBELT DIABETES CONNECTION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetOMAHA COMMUNITY PLAYHOUSE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCASA FOR DOUGLAS COUNTY: $8,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE NEBRASKA MASONIC HOME: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEBRASKA METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEBRASKA DIAPER BANK: $7,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetScatter Joy Acres: $5,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMPLETELY KIDS ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF OMAHA ↗
  • Who funds NORTHSTAR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HEARTLAND HOPE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds RADIO TALKING BOOK SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS ↗
  • Who funds Youth Care Inc ↗
  • Who funds SHARE A FARE INC ↗
  • Who funds METRO AREA YOUTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA LUTHERAN OUTDOOR MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA STREET SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE MIDLANDS ↗
  • Who funds MICAH HOUSE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds HEALING GIFT FREE CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds OLLIE WEBB CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SHELTERING TREE INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT ↗
  • Who funds SIENA FRANCIS HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds MASONIC-EASTERN STAR HOME FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds Project Kindle ↗
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS NEBRASKA ↗
  • Who funds YMCA OF GREATER OMAHA ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds DIBS for Kids ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Lozier FoundationNE52.4× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Lozier Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · Leland J & Dorothy H Olson Charitable Foundation · Immanuel Community Vision Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · Gilbert M and Martha H Hitchcock Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · Mutual of Omaha Foundation · Adah K Millard Charitable Trust · Todd and Mary Heistand Family Foundation · United Way of the Midlands · Suzanne & Walter Scott Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Oliver & Ferrol Barklage Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Oliver & Ferrol Barklage Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Oliver & Ferrol Barklage Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Oliver & Ferrol Barklage Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Oliver & Ferrol Barklage’s filings →

    More from the funding graph