Skip to content
Old Joe Club Charities Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Old Joe Club Charities Inc

Old joe club charities, inc.

$163k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$43k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$204kPhilanthropy$160kEducation$96kHealth$75kScience & Tech$43kHousing & Shelter$30kRecreation & Sports$30kCrime & Legal$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $136,250, the rows itemized in this filing. The $163,100 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $26,850 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $130k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$240k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KG EXPEDITION INC$42,500
MUTUAL AID AMBULANCE$32,000
WESTMORELAND COMMUNITY ACTION$25,000
CASA OF WESTMORELAND$20,000
ACME PROVIDERS INC$10,000
WESTMORELAND CHILDREN FIRST$6,750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $189k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WESTMORELAND HUMAN OPPORTUNITIES INC - SHOP WITH A COP: $32k → 10%JAMIE CORDIAL HALL FOUNDATION: $14k → 10%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH - CAMP KON-O-KWEE SPENCER: $35k → 11%THE CHRISTIAN LAYMANS CORPS: $11k → 10%ACME PROVIDERS INC: $10k → 10%JAMIE CORDIAL HALL FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%JAMIE CORDIAL HALL FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%WESTMORELAND CHILDREN FIRST: $7k → 10%WESTMORELAND COMMUNITY ACTION: $25k → 10%LIGONIER VALLEY MEALS ON WHEELS: $8k → 10%ACME PROVIDERS INC: $10k → 10%ACME PROVIDERS INC: $10k → 10%ACME PROVIDERS INC: $7k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 75% of Old Joe Club Charities Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 84% of the giving stays in PA; by stated purpose, 22%.

Old Joe Club Charities Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

31%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$158k · 4 repeat orgs$347k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
10

Total granted

$158k
$246k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
0%

Still filing today

100%
90%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $101k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthPublic BenefitCrime & LegalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WH
    WESTMORELAND HUMAN OPPORTUNITIES INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $57k · revenue +12%
  • AP
    ACME PROVIDERS INC
    4× · 2019–2025 · $37k · revenue +14%
  • JC
    JAMIE CORDIAL HALL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2019–2021 · $34k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • WC
    WESTMORELAND COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $58k · revenue +117%
  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH
    one grant, 2018 · $35k · revenue -15%
  • CF
    CAMP FREEDOM INC
    one grant, 2024 · $30k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Upmc Western Maryland Corporation

The mission of upmc western maryland is to serve our community by providing outstanding patient care and to shape tomorrow's health system through clinical & technological innovation, research and education.

Health
2
Wesley Spectrum Services

To empower children, adults and families by providing transformational quality whole person care .

Human Services
3
Wesley Family Services Foundation

Wesley family services foundation ("foundation") is a 501(c)(3) charitable organization and has been further classified as a type i supporting organization engaging in fund-raising, research and other charitable activities on behalf of…

Crime & Legal
4
Wrc Pennsylvania Memorial Home

Wrc pennsylvania memorial home's mission is to provide choices for generations. built on a not-for-profit foundation of caring, the organization offers residential and personal care, home and community-based services, skilled and…

Health
5
Wayne County Community Services Organization

Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv

Community Improvement
6
Western Pennsylvania Conservancy

The western pennsylvania conservancy protects and restores exceptional places to provide our region with clean waters and healthy forests, wildlife and natural areas for the benefit of present and future generations. the conservancy…

Environment
7
Center for Community Resources Inc

To coordinate services among private and government agencies for specialized populations to ensure service continuity, reduce duplication, and assist individuals and families in accessing appropriate mental health, intellectual…

Health
8
Westmoreland County Food Bank Inc

Our mission is to enable our neighbors westmoreland county residents who are hungry or at risk of hunger to have ready access to food.

Food & Nutrition
9
Western Pennsylvania Police Benevolent Foundation Inc

Provide funds to Police Officers and their families wounded or killed or disabled in the line of duty for healthcare, funerals and college of minor child

Crime & Legal
10
Valley Comprehensive Community Health Center Inc

Valley healthcare system shall improve our community's health by delivering the highest quality behavioral healthcare guided by our consumer's needs.

—
11
Wayne Memorial Long Term Care Inc

Wayne woodlands manor is committed to serve its community, patients, families, and co-workers in a tradition of high-quality, cost-effective care dedicated to its core values of compassion, advocacy, respect, excellence, and service. (see…

Health
12
Welsh Mountain Home

Welsh mountain home provides facilities, services, and programs for older adults and dependent persons. it is committed to maintaining an atmosphere of simplicity and integrity with a christian emphasis.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa of Westmoreland Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ligonier Valley Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WESTMORELAND HUMAN OPPORTUNITIES INC: $56,900 · Human ServicesWESTMORELAND HUMAN OPPORTUNITIES…ACME PROVIDERS INC: $37,000 · Human ServicesACME PROVIDERS INCYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $35,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIO…JAMIE CORDIAL HALL FOUNDATION: $34,150 · Human ServicesJAMIE CORDIAL HALL FOUNDATIONTHE CHRISTIAN LAYMANS CORPS: $10,874 · Human ServicesTHE CHRISTIAN LAYMANS CORPSLIGONIER VALLEY MEALS ON WHEELS: $8,000 · Human ServicesWESTMORELAND CHILDREN FIRST: $6,750 · Human ServicesTHE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $160,000 · PhilanthropyTHE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATIONKGXPEDITION INC: $42,500 · OtherKGXPEDITION INCUNION MISSION OF LATROBE INC: $30,000 · OtherUNION MISSION OF L…MILITARY ORDER OF THE PURPLE HEART SERVICE FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · OtherMILITARY ORDER OF …CLELIAN HEIGHTS INC: $8,000 · OtherCLELIAN HEIGHTS IN…WESTMORELAND COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $57,950 · EducationWESTMORELAND C…SAINT VINCENT COLLEGE: $30,000 · EducationSAINT VINCENT …MUTUAL AID AMBULANCE SERVICE INC: $32,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S CRANIOFACIAL ASSOCIATION: $6,000 · HealthCAMP FREEDOM INC: $30,000 · Recreation & SportsTROOPS FIRST FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $30,000 · Public BenefitCASA OF WESTMORELAND INC: $20,000 · Crime & Legal
Human Services$188,674Philanthropy$160,000Other$110,500Education$87,950Health$38,000Recreation & Sports$30,000Public Benefit$30,000Crime & Legal$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $160,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWESTMORELAND COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $57,950 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetWESTMORELAND HUMAN OPPORTUNITIES INC: $56,900 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetACME PROVIDERS INC: $37,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $35,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJAMIE CORDIAL HALL FOUNDATION: $34,150 over 3y, 18% of budgetCAMP FREEDOM INC: $30,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetUNION MISSION OF LATROBE INC: $30,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetMILITARY ORDER OF THE PURPLE HEART SERVICE FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAINT VINCENT COLLEGE: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTROOPS FIRST FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $30,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHE CHRISTIAN LAYMANS CORPS: $10,874 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S CRANIOFACIAL ASSOCIATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh Founda…Richard King Mellon F…Robertshaw Charitable…Rk Mellon Family Foun…The United Way of Sou…Firstenergy FoundationNetwork for GoodThe Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…
The Pittsburgh FoundationPA28.3× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Robertshaw Charitable Foundation · Rk Mellon Family Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · Firstenergy Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Old Joe Club Charities Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Old Joe Club Charities Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Old Joe Club Charities Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Old Joe Club Charities Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Old Joe Club Charities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home