Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Old Joe Club Charities Inc

Old joe club charities, inc.

$163k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$43k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$204kPhilanthropy$160kEducation$96kHealth$75kScience & Tech$43kHousing & Shelter$30kRecreation & Sports$30kCrime & Legal$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 6 grants below total $136,250 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $163,100 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $26,850 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $130k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$240k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KG EXPEDITION INC$42,500
MUTUAL AID AMBULANCE$32,000
WESTMORELAND COMMUNITY ACTION$25,000
CASA OF WESTMORELAND$20,000
ACME PROVIDERS INC$10,000
WESTMORELAND CHILDREN FIRST$6,750
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $189k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WESTMORELAND HUMAN OPPORTUNITIES INC - SHOP WITH A COP: $32k → 10%JAMIE CORDIAL HALL FOUNDATION: $14k → 10%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH - CAMP KON-O-KWEE SPENCER: $35k → 11%THE CHRISTIAN LAYMANS CORPS: $11k → 10%JAMIE CORDIAL HALL FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%JAMIE CORDIAL HALL FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%ACME PROVIDERS INC: $10k → 10%WESTMORELAND CHILDREN FIRST: $7k → 10%WESTMORELAND COMMUNITY ACTION: $25k → 10%LIGONIER VALLEY MEALS ON WHEELS: $8k → 10%ACME PROVIDERS INC: $10k → 10%ACME PROVIDERS INC: $10k → 10%ACME PROVIDERS INC: $7k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 75% of Old Joe Club Charities Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 84% of the giving stays in PA; read by stated purpose it is 22% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Old Joe Club Charities Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

31%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$158k · 4 repeat orgs$347k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
10

Total granted

$158k
$246k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
0%

Still filing today

100%
90%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $101k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthPublic BenefitCrime & LegalRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WH
    WESTMORELAND HUMAN OPPORTUNITIES INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $57k · revenue +12%
  • AP
    ACME PROVIDERS INC
    4× · 2019–2025 · $37k · revenue +14%
  • JC
    JAMIE CORDIAL HALL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2019–2021 · $34k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • WC
    WESTMORELAND COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $58k · revenue +117%
  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH
    one grant, 2018 · $35k · revenue -15%
  • SV
    SAINT VINCENT COLLEGE
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +14%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Upmc Western Maryland Corporation

The mission of upmc western maryland is to serve our community by providing outstanding patient care and to shape tomorrow's health system through clinical & technological innovation, research and education.

Health
2
Wesley Spectrum Services

To empower children, adults and families by providing transformational quality whole person care .

Human Services
3
Wesley Family Services Foundation

Wesley family services foundation ("foundation") is a 501(c)(3) charitable organization and has been further classified as a type i supporting organization engaging in fund-raising, research and other charitable activities on behalf of…

Crime & Legal
4
Wrc Pennsylvania Memorial Home

Wrc pennsylvania memorial home's mission is to provide choices for generations. built on a not-for-profit foundation of caring, the organization offers residential and personal care, home and community-based services, skilled and…

Health
5
Wayne County Community Services Organization

Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv

Community Improvement
6
Western Pennsylvania Conservancy

The western pennsylvania conservancy protects and restores exceptional places to provide our region with clean waters and healthy forests, wildlife and natural areas for the benefit of present and future generations. the conservancy…

Environment
7
Center for Community Resources Inc

To coordinate services among private and government agencies for specialized populations to ensure service continuity, reduce duplication, and assist individuals and families in accessing appropriate mental health, intellectual…

Health
8
Westmoreland County Food Bank Inc

Our mission is to enable our neighbors westmoreland county residents who are hungry or at risk of hunger to have ready access to food.

Food & Nutrition
9
Western Pennsylvania Police Benevolent Foundation Inc

Provide funds to Police Officers and their families wounded or killed or disabled in the line of duty for healthcare, funerals and college of minor child

Crime & Legal
10
Valley Comprehensive Community Health Center Inc

Valley healthcare system shall improve our community's health by delivering the highest quality behavioral healthcare guided by our consumer's needs.

11
Wayne Memorial Long Term Care Inc

Wayne woodlands manor is committed to serve its community, patients, families, and co-workers in a tradition of high-quality, cost-effective care dedicated to its core values of compassion, advocacy, respect, excellence, and service. (see…

Health
12
Welsh Mountain Home

Welsh mountain home provides facilities, services, and programs for older adults and dependent persons. it is committed to maintaining an atmosphere of simplicity and integrity with a christian emphasis.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa of Westmoreland Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ligonier Valley Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WESTMORELAND HUMAN OPPORTUNITIES INC — $56,900 · Human ServicesWESTMORELAND HUMAN OPPORTUNITIES…ACME PROVIDERS INC — $37,000 · Human ServicesACME PROVIDERS INCYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $35,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIO…JAMIE CORDIAL HALL FOUNDATION — $34,150 · Human ServicesJAMIE CORDIAL HALL FOUNDATIONTHE CHRISTIAN LAYMANS CORPS — $10,874 · Human ServicesTHE CHRISTIAN LAYMANS CORPSLIGONIER VALLEY MEALS ON WHEELS — $8,000 · Human ServicesWESTMORELAND CHILDREN FIRST — $6,750 · Human ServicesTHE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION — $160,000 · PhilanthropyTHE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATIONKGXPEDITION INC — $42,500 · OtherKGXPEDITION INCUNION MISSION OF LATROBE INC — $30,000 · OtherUNION MISSION OF L…MILITARY ORDER OF THE PURPLE HEART SERVICE FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 · OtherMILITARY ORDER OF …CLELIAN HEIGHTS INC — $8,000 · OtherCLELIAN HEIGHTS IN…WESTMORELAND COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $57,950 · EducationWESTMORELAND C…SAINT VINCENT COLLEGE — $30,000 · EducationSAINT VINCENT …MUTUAL AID AMBULANCE SERVICE INC — $32,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S CRANIOFACIAL ASSOCIATION — $6,000 · HealthCAMP FREEDOM INC — $30,000 · Recreation & SportsTROOPS FIRST FOUNDATION INCORPORATED — $30,000 · Public BenefitCASA OF WESTMORELAND INC — $20,000 · Crime & Legal
Human Services$188,674Philanthropy$160,000Other$110,500Education$87,950Health$38,000Recreation & Sports$30,000Public Benefit$30,000Crime & Legal$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION — $160,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWESTMORELAND COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $57,950 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetWESTMORELAND HUMAN OPPORTUNITIES INC — $56,900 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetACME PROVIDERS INC — $37,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $35,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJAMIE CORDIAL HALL FOUNDATION — $34,150 over 3y, 18% of budgetUNION MISSION OF LATROBE INC — $30,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetSAINT VINCENT COLLEGE — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILITARY ORDER OF THE PURPLE HEART SERVICE FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP FREEDOM INC — $30,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTROOPS FIRST FOUNDATION INCORPORATED — $30,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHE CHRISTIAN LAYMANS CORPS — $10,874 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S CRANIOFACIAL ASSOCIATION — $6,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh FoundationPA28.3× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Robertshaw Charitable Foundation · Rk Mellon Family Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · Firstenergy Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Old Joe Club Charities Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Old Joe Club Charities Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Old Joe Club Charities Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph