Skip to content
Olander Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Olander Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$529k
Granted FY2025still arriving
102
Grants FY2025still arriving
15
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$751kAnimals$505kRecreation & Sports$468kHealth$449kEnvironment$333kFood & Nutrition$240kPhilanthropy$205kHuman Services$195kOther$0
02FY2025 · 102 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k86 grants · $303k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $226k
$4,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BAY AREA RIDGE TRAIL COUNCIL$25,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTHERN CA$25,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF TRUCKEE$20,000
KIDS ZONE MUSEUM$20,000
JASPER RIDGE FARM$16,000
LOAVES AND FISHES$15,000
PINK RIBBON GOOD$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
SAN FRANCISCO ZOO$10,000
CLAREMONT MCKENNA COLLEGE BILL ARCE$10,000
SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY - WOMEN'S GOLF$10,000
TRUCKEE DONNER LAND TRUST$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO$10,000
TAHOE TRUCKEE EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATI$10,000
SAN JOSE AUTHORITY HALL OF FAME$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $205k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CANINE COMPANIONS: $5k → 9%CANINE COMPANIONS: $5k → 9%CANINE COMPANIONS: $5k → 9%CANINE COMPANIONS: $5k → 9%CANINE COMPANIONS: $3k → 9%PROJECT NIGHT NIGHT: $3k → 10%CANINE COMPANIONS: $3k → 9%GIVE ONE DOLLAR A DAY: $1k → 10%CANINE COMPANIONS: $3k → 9%CANINE COMPANIONS: $2k → 9%CANINE COMPANIONS: $1k → 9%PARENTS HELPING PARENTS: $5k → 8%PARENTS HELPING PARENTS: $5k → 8%PARENTS HELPING PARENTS: $5k → 8%PARENTS HELPING PARENTS: $5k → 8%PARENTS HELPING PARENTS: $5k → 8%LOVED TWICE: $1k → 10%LOVED TWICE: $1k → 10%LOVED TWICE: $1k → 10%LOVED TWICE: $1k → 10%PARENTS HELPING PARENTS: $5k → 8%MIDORI KAI: $8k → 10%MIDORI KAI: $5k → 10%MIDORI KAI: $5k → 10%MIDORI KAI: $5k → 10%MIDORI KAI: $5k → 10%PARENTS HELPING PARENTS: $3k → 8%MIDORI KAI: $5k → 10%MIDORI KAI: $5k → 10%MIDORI KAI: $5k → 10%MIDORI KAI: $5k → 10%SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $7k → 8%SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $6k → 8%SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $6k → 8%SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $6k → 8%SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $6k → 8%SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $6k → 8%SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 8%SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $2k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA: $18k → 8%JEWISH HOME: $3k → 10%JEWISH HOME: $3k → 10%JEWISH HOME: $3k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA: $3k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA: $3k → 8%HUNGER AT HOME: $3k → 8%HUNGER AT HOME: $3k → 8%SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
VA
DE
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.5M · 138 repeat orgs$141k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

138 repeat relationships: 96 still active in FY2025, 42 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

138
47

Total granted

$3.5M
$125k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
0%

Still filing today

57%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsEnvironmentEducationPhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    Bay Area Ridge Trail Council
    9× · 2017–2025 · $119k · revenue +71%
  • LA
    LOAVES AND FISHES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $98k · revenue +18%
  • University of San Francisco
    6× · 2017–2025 · $80k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • TT
    TRUCKEE TAHOE HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $12k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
  • CC
    Catholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties
    one grant, 2018 · $8k · revenue -19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Sierra Fund

The Sierra Fund (TSF) is a non-profit organization with a mission to restore ecosystem and community resiliency in the Sierra Nevada.

Environment
2
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
3
San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory

The San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory is dedicated to the conservation of birds and their habitats through science and outreach.

Environment
4
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
5
Sustainable Conservation

Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…

Environment
6
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
7
Truckee Trails Foundation Inc

The Truckee Trails Foundation (TTF) is working towards a system of trails and bikeways in and around Truckee, California that will connect people and places, reduce our community's dependence on automobiles, and improve our physical,…

Environment
8
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
9
California Pacific Medical Center Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
10
The Trust for Public Land

The trust for public land creates parks and protects land for people, ensuring healthy, livable communities for generations to come. in the past year, we helped communities to plan for parks and conservation, fund parks and conservation,…

Environment
11
Tahoe Community Foundation

The Foundation envisions a thriving community created through meaningful philanthropy, inclusive communication, and the willingness to explore possibilities together.

Education
12
Sacramento Region Community Foundation

The Sacramento Region Community Foundation leads, serves, and inspires enduring philanthropy for a just and vibrant Sacramento region.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Basic Fund; the most unlike its peers is The Reach Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

102 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 102 of the 193 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
29
Early backer (in before they grew)
99/102
Grantees still filing
70/102
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HUMANE SOCIETY OF TRUCKEE: $195,241 · OtherHUMANE SOCIETY OF TRUCKEEBay Area Ridge Trail Council: $118,500 · OtherLOAVES AND FISHES: $98,000 · OtherKIDS ZONE MUSEUM: $96,549 · Other+126 more: $1,963,866 · Other+126 moreSAN FRANCISCO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $71,500 · AnimalsJasper Ridge Farm: $56,650 · AnimalsMUTTVILLE: $41,500 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY: $23,500 · AnimalsTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER: $20,000 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF THE PALO ALTO JUNIOR MUSEUM & ZOO: $18,500 · AnimalsHappy Hollow Foundation: $13,500 · AnimalsBEAR LEAGUE: $10,000 · AnimalsNORTH VALLEY ANIMAL DISASTER GROUP: $10,000 · Animals+2 more: $3,320 · AnimalsTAHOE TRUCKEE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $42,500 · PhilanthropyLOS ALTOS MOUNTAIN VIEW COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $40,000 · PhilanthropyLOS ALTOS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $36,000 · PhilanthropyTHE REACH FOUNDATION: $27,500 · PhilanthropyMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $27,200 · PhilanthropySilicon Valley Community Foundation: $27,000 · PhilanthropyGIANTS COMMUNITY FUND: $22,360 · PhilanthropyEDUCATING TANZANIA FOUNDATION: $10,200 · PhilanthropyRESPONSIBILITY: $9,000 · Philanthropy19 FOR LIFE FOUNDATION: $9,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $6,332 · PhilanthropyTRUCKEE DONNER LAND TRUST: $79,875 · EnvironmentPENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST: $53,500 · EnvironmentSIERRA WATCH: $30,500 · EnvironmentTAHOE FUND: $26,000 · EnvironmentGOLDEN GATE NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVANCY: $21,000 · EnvironmentSEMPERVIRENS FUND: $18,500 · EnvironmentTRUST FOR HIDDEN VILLA: $17,049 · Environment+3 more: $4,000 · EnvironmentMIDORI-KAI INC: $47,500 · Human ServicesSUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $45,687 · Human ServicesPARENTS HELPING PARENTS INC: $32,500 · Human ServicesCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $31,500 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $23,500 · Human ServicesHEBREW HOME FOR AGED DISABLED: $7,500 · Human Services+6 more: $17,160 · Human ServicesUniversity of San Francisco: $80,000 · EducationTHE BASIC FUND: $35,500 · EducationFriends of the Truckee Library Inc: $34,000 · EducationPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $32,500 · EducationROBERT LOUIS STEVENSON SCHOOL: $9,500 · Education+4 more: $6,200 · EducationSUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $51,000 · HealthPINK RIBBON GOOD INC: $30,000 · HealthStroke Awareness Foundation: $26,250 · HealthGeorge Mark Childrens Fund: $20,607 · HealthFAMILY HOUSE INC: $19,042 · HealthCSNK2A1 FOUNDATION: $6,500 · HealthJW HOUSE: $6,000 · Health+2 more: $6,000 · Health
Other$2,472,156Animals$268,470Philanthropy$257,092Environment$250,424Human Services$205,347Education$197,700Health$165,399

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBay Area Ridge Trail Council: $118,500 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetLOAVES AND FISHES: $98,000 over 9y, 6.1% of budgetUniversity of San Francisco: $80,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTRUCKEE DONNER LAND TRUST: $79,875 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $71,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $59,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetJasper Ridge Farm: $56,650 over 8y, 3.4% of budgetPENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST: $53,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $51,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTruckee Community Cares: $50,665 over 9y, 14% of budgetMIDORI-KAI INC: $47,500 over 9y, 12% of budgetLEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE: $47,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCOLLEGE OF ADAPTIVE ARTS: $46,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetSUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $45,687 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBlach Intermediate School PTA: $45,000 over 9y, 5.2% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR EQUINE FACILITATED THERAPY: $43,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetYOSEMITE FOUNDATION: $43,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTAHOE TRUCKEE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $42,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMUTTVILLE: $41,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ALTOS MOUNTAIN VIEW COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetPATHWAYS HOME HEALTH AND HOSPICE: $38,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTahoe Rim Trail Association: $37,500 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetLOS ALTOS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $36,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTHE KILGORIS PROJECT: $35,500 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetTHE BASIC FUND: $35,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFriends of the Truckee Library Inc: $34,000 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $32,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPARENTS HELPING PARENTS INC: $32,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $31,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA WATCH: $30,500 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetPINK RIBBON GOOD INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGLIDE FOUNDATION: $29,800 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetOKIZU FOUNDATION: $29,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN HOUSE: $29,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAN JOSE SPORTS AUTHORITY: $28,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetTHE REACH FOUNDATION: $27,500 over 6y, 4.3% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $27,200 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSilicon Valley Community Foundation: $27,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetStroke Awareness Foundation: $26,250 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetTAHOE FUND: $26,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $23,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY: $23,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLaw Foundation of Silicon Valley: $22,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGIANTS COMMUNITY FUND: $22,360 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetIcelandic Roots: $22,000 over 6y, 4.6% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION TO ADVANCE VASCULAR CURES: $21,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetGOLDEN GATE NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVANCY: $21,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGeorge Mark Childrens Fund: $20,607 over 9y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Bay Area Ridge Trail Council ↗
  • Who funds LOAVES AND FISHES ↗
  • Who funds University of San Francisco ↗
  • Who funds TRUCKEE DONNER LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
  • Who funds Jasper Ridge Farm ↗
  • Who funds PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST ↗
  • Who funds SUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Truckee Community Cares ↗
  • Who funds MIDORI-KAI INC ↗
  • Who funds LEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF ADAPTIVE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Blach Intermediate School PTA ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR EQUINE FACILITATED THERAPY ↗
  • Who funds YOSEMITE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TAHOE TRUCKEE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MUTTVILLE ↗
  • Who funds LOS ALTOS MOUNTAIN VIEW COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PATHWAYS HOME HEALTH AND HOSPICE ↗
  • Who funds Tahoe Rim Trail Association ↗
  • Who funds LOS ALTOS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE KILGORIS PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds THE BASIC FUND ↗
  • Who funds Friends of the Truckee Library Inc ↗
  • Who funds PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds PARENTS HELPING PARENTS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Steven L Hallgrimson …Silicon Valley Commun…Los Altos Mountain Vi…The Sobrato Family Fo…San Jose Mercury News…Marin Community Found…Jewish Community Fede…Gordon E and Betty I …The David and Lucile …The San Francisco Fou…Agilent Technologies …Bright Funds Foundati…
Steven L Hallgrimson Foundation IncCA41.1× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Steven L Hallgrimson Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Los Altos Mountain View Community Foundation · The Sobrato Family Foundation · San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · Marin Community Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Agilent Technologies Foundation · Bright Funds Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Olander Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Olander Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    6get no government money at all
    31report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Olander Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Olander Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 193 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Olander Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home