Skip to content

· Private foundation

Okura Mental Health Leadership Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$92k
Granted FY2020
10
Grants FY2020
2
States reached
$67k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Okura Mental Health Leadership Foundation Inc’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Common Counsel Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Okura Mental Health Leadership Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 8 organizations, $92k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

0
’17
4
’18
4
’19
8
’20
1
’22
0
’23
0
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$402kCommunity Improvement$158kArts & Culture$130kHealth$35kEducation$14kReligion$9kHuman Services$8kCivil Rights$4k
02FY2020 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k9 grants · $25k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $67k
$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LITTLE TOKYO SERVICE CENTER$67,425
BUENA VISTA UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$4,350
FILIPINO MIGRANT CENTER$4,350
ALLIANCE FOR GLOBAL JUSTICE$4,350
JAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM$3,000
KEIRO$2,350
PACIFIC CLINICS$2,175
ASIAN AMERICAN DRUG ABUSE PROGRAM$2,175
KIZUNA$1,000
ZENTOKU FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PROVIDENCE TRINITYCARE HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$189k · 7 repeat orgs$160k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2020, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
2

Total granted

$189k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+94%
+118%

Still filing today

57%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $120k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22
Community ImprovementCivil RightsArts & CultureHuman ServicesSocial ScienceInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • 1L
    1979 LEGACY CORP
    3× · 2018–2020 · $158k · revenue +126%
  • FM
    Filipino Migrant Center
    3× · 2018–2020 · $8k · revenue +54%
  • JAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM
    3× · 2018–2020 · $7k · revenue +94%

Funded once

  • CO
    COUNCIL ON SOCIAL WORK EDUC
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • PT
    PROVIDENCE TRINITYCARE HOSPICE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +118%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
2
Asian Law Caucus

The Asian Law Caucus's mission is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist…

Crime & Legal
3
Asian Art Museum Foundation of San Francisco

The asian art museum celebrates, preserves, and promotes asian and asian american art and cultures for local and global audiences. we provide a dynamic forum for exchanging ideas, inviting collaboration, and fueling imagination to deepen…

Arts & Culture
4
Uc Riverside Foundation

To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.

Education
5
Unitarian Universalist Justice Ministry of California

The unitarian universalist legislative ministry, ca is a statewide justice ministry that cultivates and connects leaders and communites to empower the public voice of those who share uu values and principles

—
6
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
7
Japan America Society of So California

The japan america society of southern california works to (1) promote among the american people a more accurate knowledge of the people of japan, their aims, customs, ideals, arts and sciences, industries, economic conditions, and…

International
8
League of California Community Foundations

The league of california community foundations promotes and strengthens community foundations in california. through collaboration and shared learning among member foundations and building partnerships with private and public entities, we…

Philanthropy
9
Asian Pacific Community Fund of Southern California

Our mission is to cultivate philanthropists to invest in organizations that empower under-served asian and pacific islanders (api) to prosper by 1) building healthier communities, 2) developing api leaders, 3) creating a stronger api…

Unclassified
10
Pacific Community Fund Fka National Asian American Coalition

Naac's mission is to be the preferred conduit of low & moderate income families. this includes, but is not limited, to increasing sustainable and responsible homeownership and outreach for small business development, minorities, and…

Human Services
11
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
12
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Visual Communications Media; the most unlike its peers is Japanese American National Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION: $402,349 · Community ImprovementCOMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION1979 LEGACY CORP: $157,925 · Community Improvement1979 LEGACY CORPVISUAL COMMUNICATIONS MEDIA: $120,000 · Social ScienceVISUAL COMMUNICAT…COUNCIL ON SOCIAL WORK EDUC: $25,000 · OtherBUENA VISTA UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $4,350 · OtherKIZUNA: $4,250 · OtherASIAN AMERICAN DRUG ABUSE PROGRAM INC: $4,175 · OtherJACCC: $4,000 · OtherVISUAL COMMUNICATIONS: $3,000 · OtherKEIRO: $2,350 · OtherPACIFIC CLINICS: $2,175 · Other+1 more: $1,000 · OtherUCLA FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationFilipino Migrant Center: $8,350 · Civil RightsJAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM: $7,000 · Arts & CultureAlliance for Global Justice Corp: $4,350 · InternationalPROVIDENCE TRINITYCARE HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Human Services
Community Improvement$560,274Social Science$120,000Other$50,300Education$10,000Civil Rights$8,350Arts & Culture$7,000International$4,350Human Services$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION: $402,349 over 2y, 0.4% of budget1979 LEGACY CORP: $157,925 over 3y, 16% of budgetVISUAL COMMUNICATIONS MEDIA: $120,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFilipino Migrant Center: $8,350 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetJAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAlliance for Global Justice Corp: $4,350 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASIAN AMERICAN DRUG ABUSE PROGRAM INC: $4,175 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPACIFIC CLINICS: $2,175 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE TRINITYCARE HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA16.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Durfee Foundation · Sempra Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Okura Mental Health Leadership Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Okura Mental Health Leadership Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Okura Mental Health Leadership’s filings →

    More from the funding graph