Skip to content
Oklahoma Partnership for School Readiness Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Oklahoma Partnership for School Readiness Foundation Inc

To improve school readiness outcomes in oklahoma.

$8.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$975k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$3.5MHuman Services$3.2MEducation$2.6MEnvironment$819kCommunity Improvement$214kYouth Development$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $35k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $1.6M
  • $250k+12 grants · $6.7M
$254,747
Median grant
2
States reached
$6.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER$974,894
BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA$818,549
REACH OUT AND READ$740,394
TULSA EDUCARE INC$739,145
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT ASSOCIATION$594,098
OKLAHOMA COMMISSION CHILDREN AND YOUTH$524,154
LITTLE OTTER HEALTH INC$514,000
SUNBEAM$463,358
WASHINGTON COUNTY CHILD CARE FOUNDATION$400,000
OK AIMH$360,975
RAINBOW FLEET INC$350,000
LILYFIELD$254,747
GREAT PLAINS YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES$200,000
SHAWNEE FORWARD INC$200,000
EAST CENTRAL UNIVERSITY$200,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%WASHINGTON COUNTY CHILD CARE FOUNDATION: $400k → 14%GREAT PLAINS YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $200k → 23%SUNBEAM: $463k → 16%BUTTERFLY AEFFECT: $160k → 15%LILYFIELD: $255k → 16%OKLAHOMA ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES: $75k → 16%OKLAHOMA ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES: $25k → 16%LATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY: $100k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.0M · 7 repeat orgs$5.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
10

Total granted

$5.0M
$234k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+32%

Still filing today

71%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • REACH OUT AND READ INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +71%
  • CD
    COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT ASSOCIATIO
    2× · 2022–2025 · $608k · revenue +60%
  • RF
    RAINBOW FLEET INC
    2× · 2022–2025 · $368k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • OC
    OKLAHOMA CHILD CARE RESOURCE & REF
    one grant, 2021 · $120k
  • AF
    AUTISM FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • DC
    DELAWARE CHILD DEVELOP CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oklahoma Child Care Resource & Referral Association Inc

Our Mission is for all Oklahoma families to have access to quality care and education for their children through community-based resource and referral services; with a vision of Oklahoma communities supporting the development and learning…

—
2
Oklahoma Afterschool Network Inc

Works to ensure that all children and youth in Oklahoma have access to safe and enriching learning opportunities during their out-of-school time.

—
3
Okanogan County Child Development Association

Provides early childhood education and comprehensive, prevention based quality service for eligible children ages 0-5, pregnant women, and their families assisting them to achieve lifelong learning. occda supports parents/guardians as the…

Unclassified
4
Middle Earth Child Dev Center Inc

Provide high quality child developement services that incorporate appropriate activities. Maintain services that are affordable so parents and children are best serviced regardless of financial circumstances.

Human Services
5
Fcc Child Development Center Inc Dba Growing Kidz

The fcc child development center (cdc) opened its doors september 8, 1987 with the primary purpose of providing quality childcare to those families living and working in the downtown tulsa area and surrounding areas. the cdc provides full…

—
6
Tulsa Advocates for the Protection of Children

To improve the lives of children and youth in oklahoma's child welfare system by providing resources and building community.

Crime & Legal
7
Oklahoma Literacy Coalition Inc

Supports Literacy Efforts Statewide by providing continuing education for literacy providers, grants to literacy organizations, and literacy awareness to government and media.

—
8
Middle Earth Learning Center Inc

Provide high quality child developement services that incorporate appropriate activities. Maintain services that are affordable so parents and children are best serviced regardless of financial circumstances.

—
9
Oklahoma Connections Academy Inc

Oklahoma connections inc, a public charter school, uses the connections curriculum to offer oklahoma students in grades k-12 an exceptional learning experience.

Education
10
Oklahoma Life Skills Association

To offer exceptional care to very low to moderate income children who have been diagnosed with a special need so that parents may sustain or seek employment or attend school. Special Kids is a full inclusion childcare meaning that typical…

Education
11
Casa of Southern Oklahoma Inc

Solicit, train & direct activities of court-appointed volunteer advocates for children in cases involving child abuse and neglect. assist in direct expense needs of individual children in court-appointed cases.

Civil Rights
12
Care Center-Child Abuse Response and Evaluation Inc Dba the Care Center

The CARE Center exists to reduce trauma for child abuse victims and their families, coordinate a multidisciplinary approach to child abuse investigations, and provide free, effective child abuse prevention resources and education.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma Association for Infant Mental Health; the most unlike its peers is Butterfly AEffect Syndicate. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
11/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center: $1,190,595 · OtherUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences CenterUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA: $974,154 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMAUNVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA: $818,549 · OtherUNVERSITY OF OKLAHOMALITTLE OTTER HEALTH INC: $514,000 · OtherLITTLE OTTER HEALTH INCEAST CENTRAL UNIVERSITY: $200,000 · Other+12 more: $552,556 · Other+12 moreREACH OUT AND READ INC: $1,740,394 · EducationREACH OUT AND READ INCRAINBOW FLEET INC: $367,713 · EducationRAINBOW FLEET INCSPROUTS CHILD DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE INC: $189,036 · EducationSPROUTS CHILD DEVELOPMENT…+2 more: $49,000 · EducationSUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC: $463,358 · Human ServicesSUNBEAM FAMILY SER…WASHINGTON COUNTY CHILD CARE FOUNDATION: $400,000 · Human ServicesWASHINGTON COUNTY …LILYFIELD INC: $254,747 · Human ServicesLILYFIELD INCGreat Plains Youth & Family Service: $200,000 · Human ServicesGreat Plains Youth…Butterfly AEffect Syndicate: $160,000 · Human ServicesButterfly AEffect …LATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesLATINO COMMUNITY D…OKLAHOMA ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ACTION: $100,000 · Human ServicesOKLAHOMA ASSOCIATI…COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT ASSOCIATIO: $607,598 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY …SHAWNEE FORWARD INC: $200,000 · Community ImprovementSHAWNEE FO…OKLAHOMA CHILDCARE ASSOCIATION INC: $139,535 · Community ImprovementOKLAHOMA C…TULSA EDUCARE INC: $739,145 · Youth DevelopmentOKLAHOMA ASSOCIATION FOR INFANT MENTAL HEALTH: $360,975 · HealthOklahoma Family Network Inc: $35,000 · Health
Other$4,249,854Education$2,346,143Human Services$1,678,105Community Improvement$947,133Youth Development$739,145Health$395,975

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetREACH OUT AND READ INC: $1,740,394 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetTULSA EDUCARE INC: $739,145 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT ASSOCIATIO: $607,598 over 2y, 10% of budgetSUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC: $463,358 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetWASHINGTON COUNTY CHILD CARE FOUNDATION: $400,000 over 1y, 32% of budgetRAINBOW FLEET INC: $367,713 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetSHAWNEE FORWARD INC: $200,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetGreat Plains Youth & Family Service: $200,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetLATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY INC: $100,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetOKLAHOMA ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ACTION: $100,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetPIONEER LIBRARY SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $39,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetSOUTHERN OKLAHOMA LIBRARY SYSTEM: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDUNCAN PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $9,500 over 1y, 3.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundatio…Oklahoma City Communi…Potts Family Foundati…Sarkeys FoundationFeed the Children IncInasmuch FoundationTulsa Community Found…Honestly IncOklahoma Center for N…Harris Foundation IncGeorge Kaiser Family …Folds of Honor Founda…
Communities Foundation of OklahomaOK21.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Potts Family Foundation Inc · Sarkeys Foundation · Feed the Children Inc · Inasmuch Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Honestly Inc · Oklahoma Center for Nonprofits Inc · Harris Foundation Inc · George Kaiser Family Foundation · Folds of Honor Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Oklahoma Partnership for School Readiness Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Oklahoma Partnership for School Readiness Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 46%
  • Oklahoma Association of Community Action: 77% of income from government
  • Sunbeam Family Services Inc: 52% of income from government
  • Tulsa Educare Inc: 46% of income from government
  • Oklahoma Family Network Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Reach Out and Read Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Community Development Support Associatio: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Oklahoma Partnership for School Readiness’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home