· Public charity
Oklahoma Partnership for School Readiness Foundation Inc
To improve school readiness outcomes in oklahoma.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 41% of OKLAHOMA PARTNERSHIP FOR SCHOOL READINESS FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k1 grant · $35k
- $50k–250k11 grants · $1.6M
- $250k+12 grants · $6.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER | $974,894 |
| BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA | $818,549 |
| REACH OUT AND READ | $740,394 |
| TULSA EDUCARE INC | $739,145 |
| COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT ASSOCIATION | $594,098 |
| OKLAHOMA COMMISSION CHILDREN AND YOUTH | $524,154 |
| LITTLE OTTER HEALTH INC | $514,000 |
| SUNBEAM | $463,358 |
| WASHINGTON COUNTY CHILD CARE FOUNDATION | $400,000 |
| OK AIMH | $360,975 |
| RAINBOW FLEET INC | $350,000 |
| LILYFIELD | $254,747 |
| EAST CENTRAL UNIVERSITY | $200,000 |
| SHAWNEE FORWARD INC | $200,000 |
| GREAT PLAINS YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES | $200,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
REACH OUT AND READ INC4× · 2021–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +71%- CDCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT ASSOCIATIO2× · 2022–2025 · $608k · revenue +60%
- RFRAINBOW FLEET INC2× · 2022–2025 · $368k · revenue +56%
Funded once
- OCOKLAHOMA CHILD CARE RESOURCE & REFone grant, 2021 · $120k
- AFAUTISM FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $25k
- DCDELAWARE CHILD DEVELOP CENTERone grant, 2022 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our Mission is for all Oklahoma families to have access to quality care and education for their children through community-based resource and referral services; with a vision of Oklahoma communities supporting the development and learning…
Works to ensure that all children and youth in Oklahoma have access to safe and enriching learning opportunities during their out-of-school time.
Provides early childhood education and comprehensive, prevention based quality service for eligible children ages 0-5, pregnant women, and their families assisting them to achieve lifelong learning. occda supports parents/guardians as the…
Provide high quality child developement services that incorporate appropriate activities. Maintain services that are affordable so parents and children are best serviced regardless of financial circumstances.
The fcc child development center (cdc) opened its doors september 8, 1987 with the primary purpose of providing quality childcare to those families living and working in the downtown tulsa area and surrounding areas. the cdc provides full…
To improve the lives of children and youth in oklahoma's child welfare system by providing resources and building community.
Supports Literacy Efforts Statewide by providing continuing education for literacy providers, grants to literacy organizations, and literacy awareness to government and media.
Provide high quality child developement services that incorporate appropriate activities. Maintain services that are affordable so parents and children are best serviced regardless of financial circumstances.
Oklahoma connections inc, a public charter school, uses the connections curriculum to offer oklahoma students in grades k-12 an exceptional learning experience.
To offer exceptional care to very low to moderate income children who have been diagnosed with a special need so that parents may sustain or seek employment or attend school. Special Kids is a full inclusion childcare meaning that typical…
Solicit, train & direct activities of court-appointed volunteer advocates for children in cases involving child abuse and neglect. assist in direct expense needs of individual children in court-appointed cases.
The CARE Center exists to reduce trauma for child abuse victims and their families, coordinate a multidisciplinary approach to child abuse investigations, and provide free, effective child abuse prevention resources and education.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma Association for Infant Mental Health and the most unlike its peers is Butterfly AEffect Syndicate. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds REACH OUT AND READ INC ↗
- Who funds TULSA EDUCARE INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT ASSOCIATIO ↗
- Who funds SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON COUNTY CHILD CARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RAINBOW FLEET INC ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA ASSOCIATION FOR INFANT MENTAL HEALTH ↗
- Who funds LILYFIELD INC ↗
- Who funds Great Plains Youth & Family Service ↗
- Who funds SHAWNEE FORWARD INC ↗
- Who funds SPROUTS CHILD DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds Butterfly AEffect Syndicate ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA CHILDCARE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds LATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ACTION ↗
- Who funds PIONEER LIBRARY SYSTEM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Oklahoma Family Network Inc ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA LIBRARY SYSTEM ↗
- Who funds DUNCAN PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Potts Family Foundation Inc · Sarkeys Foundation · Feed the Children Inc · Inasmuch Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Honestly Inc · Oklahoma Center for Nonprofits Inc · Harris Foundation Inc · George Kaiser Family Foundation · Folds of Honor Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Oklahoma Partnership for School Readiness Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Oklahoma Association of Community Action — 77% of income from government
- Sunbeam Family Services Inc — 52% of income from government
- Tulsa Educare Inc — 46% of income from government
- Oklahoma Family Network Inc — 10% of income from government
- Reach Out and Read Inc — 9% of income from government
- Community Development Support Associatio — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.