Skip to content

· Public charity

Oklahoma Native Assets Coalition Inc

The organization assists in the development and support of a network of native people who are dedicated to increasing the self-sufficiency and prosperity of their communities.

$467k
Granted FY2022
7
Grants FY2022
6
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2022.

Community Improvement$110kHealth$40kHousing & Shelter$36kArts & Culture$28k
02FY2022 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $100,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $466,522 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $366,522 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $93k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STOCKBRIDGE-MUNSEE BAND OF MOHICAN INDIANS$28,000
MENOMINEE INDIAN TRIBE OF WI$20,000
WHITE EARTH INVESTMENT INITIATIVE$15,000
WHITE MOUNTAIN APACHE HA$10,000
TLINGIT HAIDA REGIONAL HOUSING AUTHORITY$10,000
YSLETA DEL SUR PUEBLO$10,000
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE PEORIA TRIBE OF INDIANS OF OKLAHOMA$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WHITE MOUNTAIN APACHE HA: $10k → 19%WHITE EARTH INVESTMENT INITIATIVE: $15k → 10%PEOPLE'S PARTNER FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $16k → 18%YSLETA DEL SUR PUEBLO: $10k → 21%OSAGE FINANCIAL RESOURCES: $5k → 14%HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE PEORIA TRIBE OF INDIANS OF OKLAHOMA: $7k → 20%STOCKBRIDGE-MUNSEE BAND OF MOHICAN INDIANS: $28k → 11%MENOMINEE INDIAN TRIBE OF WI: $20k → 24%TLINGIT HAIDA REGIONAL HOUSING AUTHORITY: $10k → 8%FOUR BANDS COMMUNITY FUND: $7k → 25%FOUR DIRECTIONS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $7k → 15%WHITE EARTH INVESTMENT INITIATIVE: $15k → 10%PEOPLE'S PARTNER FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $16k → 18%TLINGIT-HAIDA REGIONAL HOUSING AUTHORITY: $7k → 8%FOUR BANDS COMMUNITY FUND: $7k → 25%FOUR DIRECTIONS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $7k → 15%WHITE EARTH INVESTMENT INITIATIVE: $15k → 10%TLINGIT-HAIDA REGIONAL HOUSING AUTHORITY: $7k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
MT
MN
WI
SD
AZ
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$127k · 5 repeat orgs$87k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +401% since the first grant, against -27% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
2

Total granted

$127k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+401%
-27%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’22
Community ImprovementHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WE
    WHITE EARTH INVESTMENT INITIATIVE
    5× · 2019–2024 · $45k · revenue +398%
  • TP
    THE PEOPLES PARTNERS FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
    4× · 2019–2023 · $31k · revenue +852%
  • TR
    Tlingit-Haida Regional Housing Authority
    6× · 2019–2024 · $24k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • CN
    CHEROKEE NATION COMMERCE SERV
    one grant, 2018 · $7k
  • OF
    OSAGE FINANCIAL RESOURCES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Indian Community Development Corporation

To provide culturally unique initiatives, housing & entrepreneurial programs that will strengthen the american indian community

Housing & Shelter
2
Native American Community Development Institute

The Native American Community Development Institute (NACDI) is an American Indian community development intermediary - the first of its kind in the region - created by and for American Indians. NACDI is committed to transforming the…

Arts & Culture
3
Nacdc Financial Services Inc

Provide alternative financing opportunity for Native American entrepreneurs and small businesses in communities in and near Indian Reservations.

Community Improvement
4
Red Feather Development Group

Red feather development group partners with american indian nations to develop and implement sustainable solutions to the housing needs within their communities.

Housing & Shelter
5
Northwest Native Development Fund

The organization seeks to foster economic and financial independence for native people by assisting in the development of personal assets through financial and entrepreneurial education as well as providing access to capital through…

Human Services
6
Westwater Financial Inc

Native Community Development Financial Institution. To foster, facilitate and promote community and economic development among Dry Creek Tribal members, thier families and other Native

Community Improvement
7
Cankdeska Cikana Community College

To provide higher education opportunities, at the community college level, including vocational and technical training. as a tribal community college, we emphasize the teaching and learning of dakota culture and language toward the…

Education
8
Cook Inlet Lending Center

Cook inlet lending center is a non-profit lending entity established to promote and provide lending products and services to low-income persons in the cook inlet region.

Community Improvement
9
Choctaw Home Finance Corporation

To provide affordable home financing to native americans with low and moderate income.

Housing & Shelter
10
Northern California Indian Development Council Inc

Research, develop, and administer social and economic development programs to meet the needs of indian and native american communities and individuals residing in the state of california. also for the conservation and preservation of…

—
11
Mazaska Owecaso Otipi Financial Inc

Creates homeownership opportunities for the members of the Oglala Sioux Tribe living on, or in the communities adjacent to, the Pine Ridge Reservation. Mazaska is a Native community development financial institution that provides housing…

Housing & Shelter
12
Native Renewables Inc

To grow indigenous-led solar knowledge and solutions with hopi and din (navajo) families and communities.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Lakota Fund Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Tlingit-Haida Regional Housing Authority. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WHITE EARTH INVESTMENT INITIATIVE: $45,000 · Community ImprovementWHITE EARTH INVESTMENT INITIATIVETHE PEOPLES PARTNERS FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $31,400 · Community ImprovementTHE PEOPLES PARTNERS FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTFOUR BANDS COMMUNITY FUND INC: $13,000 · Community ImprovementFOUR BANDS COMMUNITY FUND INCSTOCKBRIDGE-MUNSEE COMMUNITY: $28,000 · OtherSTOCKBRIDGE-MUNSEE COMMUNITYMENOMINEE INDIAN TRIBE OF WISCONSIN: $20,000 · OtherMENOMINEE INDIAN TRIBE OF WISCONSINYsleta del Sur Pueblo: $10,000 · OtherYsleta del Sur PuebloB&GC of White Mountain Apache: $10,000 · OtherB&GC of White Mountain ApacheCHEROKEE NATION COMMERCE SERV: $7,000 · OtherCHEROKEE NATION COMMERCE SERVHOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE PEORIA TRIBE OF INDIANS OF OKLAHOMA: $7,000 · OtherHOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE PEORIA TRIBE OF IN…Tlingit-Haida Regional Housing Authority: $24,000 · Housing & ShelterTlingit-Haida Regional…Four Directions Development Corporation: $14,000 · Housing & ShelterFour Directions Develo…OSAGE FINANCIAL RESOURCES INC: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterOSAGE FINANCIAL RESOUR…
Community Improvement$89,400Other$82,000Housing & Shelter$43,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWHITE EARTH INVESTMENT INITIATIVE: $45,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetTHE PEOPLES PARTNERS FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $31,400 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetTlingit-Haida Regional Housing Authority: $24,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFour Directions Development Corporation: $14,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetFOUR BANDS COMMUNITY FUND INC: $13,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetOSAGE FINANCIAL RESOURCES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WHITE EARTH INVESTMENT INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds THE PEOPLES PARTNERS FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds Tlingit-Haida Regional Housing Authority ↗
  • Who funds Four Directions Development Corporation ↗
  • Who funds FOUR BANDS COMMUNITY FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds OSAGE FINANCIAL RESOURCES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Nations Development InstituteCO39.2× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Nations Development Institute · Native American Agriculture Fund · National Congress of American Indians Fund · Ndn Collective Inc · Oweesta Corporation · Northwest Area Foundation · Enterprise Community Partners Inc · First Peoples Fund · The Bush Foundation · Opportunity Finance Network · Share Our Strength · Boys & Girls Clubs of America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Oklahoma Native Assets Coalition Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Oklahoma Native Assets Coalition Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Oklahoma Native Assets Coalition Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Oklahoma Native Assets Coalition Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $483k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Oklahoma Native Assets Coalition’s filings →

    More from the funding graph