Loading…
· Public charity
OKLAHOMA NATIVE ASSETS COALITION INC
The organization assists in the development and support of a network of native people who are dedicated to increasing the self-sufficiency and prosperity of their communities.
$467k
Granted FY2022
7
Grants
6
Communities
$28k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 46% of OKLAHOMA NATIVE ASSETS COALITION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
four
2020
tribalaffordable housingeconomicloansindian reservationpovertyeducation
2022
indiantrainingweatherization
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2022 · 7 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $93k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
- STOCKBRIDGE-MUNSEE BAND OF MOHICAN INDIANS$28,000
- MENOMINEE INDIAN TRIBE OF WI$20,000
- WHITE EARTH INVESTMENT INITIATIVE$15,000
- WHITE MOUNTAIN APACHE HA$10,000
- YSLETA DEL SUR PUEBLO$10,000
- TLINGIT HAIDA REGIONAL HOUSING AUTHORITY$10,000
- HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE PEORIA TRIBE OF INDIANS OF OKLAHOMA$7,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 10%. 88% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
45%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$96k · 4 repeat orgs$118k to everyone else
4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
4
4
Total granted
$96k
$43k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+477%
+1090%
Still filing today
100%
50%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Community ImprovementHousing & ShelterOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WEWHITE EARTH INVESTMENT INITIATIVE5× · 2019–2024 · $45k · revenue +477%
- TRTLINGIT-HAIDA REGIONAL HOUSING AUTHORITY6× · 2019–2024 · $24k · revenue +62%
- FDFOUR DIRECTIONS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION5× · 2019–2024 · $14k · revenue +178%
Funded once
- PPPEOPLE'S PARTNER FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTone grant, 2019 · $16k
- PPPEOPLE'S PARTNER FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTgraduated3× · 2020–2023 · $16k · revenue +1090%
- CNCHEROKEE NATION COMMERCE SERVone grant, 2018 · $7k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
American Indian Community Development
To provide culturally unique initiatives, housing & entrepreneurial programs that will strengthen the american indian community
Housing & Shelter
2
Cankdeska Cikana Community College
Cccc provides opportunities that lead to student independence and self-sufficiency through academic achievement and continuation of spirit lake dakota language and culture.
Education
3
Native American Community Development
Helping Native people create the future they envision.
Arts & Culture
4
Northwest Indian College Foundation
To provide excellent educational programs and services in a native american college environment on reservations throughout the northwest.
Education
5
Wind River Development Fund
The organization's mission is to provide financial opportunities to stimulate economic development on and near the wind river indian reservation, to promote self-sufficiency, self-determination, and an enhanced quality of life for the…
Community Improvement
6
Cook Inlet Lending Center
Cook inlet lending center is a nonprofit lending entity established to promote and provide lending products and services to low-income persons, primarily those of american indian/alaska native descent.
Community Improvement
7
Mazaska Owecaso Otipi Financial Inc
Creates homeownership opportunities for the members of the Oglala Sioux Tribe living on, or in the communities adjacent to, the Pine Ridge Reservation. Mazaska is a Native community development financial institution that provides housing…
Housing & Shelter
8
Westwater Financial Inc
Native Community Development Financial Institution. To foster, facilitate and promote community and economic development among Dry Creek Tribal members, thier families and other Native
Community Improvement
9
Jamestown S'Klallam Tribal Capital
We are a Department of Treasury Certified Native Community Development Financial Institution (CDFI), revolving loan fund. We offer micro loans to underserved people that don't qualify for traditional sources of financing, in conjunction…
Community Improvement
10
Salish Kootenai College Inc
To provide quality postsecondary educational opportunities for native americans, locally and from throughout the united states. the college will promote community and individual development and perpetuate the cultures of the confederated…
Education
11
Nacdc Financial Services Inc
Provide alternative financing opportunity for Native American entrepreneurs and small businesses in communities in and near Indian Reservations.
Community Improvement
12
Red Feather Development Group
Red feather development group partners with american indian nations to develop and implement sustainable solutions to the housing needs within their communities.
Housing & Shelter
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Lakota Fund Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is Tlingit-Haida Regional Housing Authority. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
12/13
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$97,700Community Improvement$73,700Housing & Shelter$43,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
First Nations Development InstituteCO40× affinity17 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: First Nations Development Institute · Ndn Collective Inc · Oweesta Corporation · Northwest Area Foundation · Enterprise Community Partners Inc · First Peoples Fund · The Bush Foundation · Share Our Strength · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation OKLAHOMA NATIVE ASSETS COALITION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: WHITE EARTH INVESTMENT INITIATIVE.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~117 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 5.8× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 010732253 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on WHITE EARTH INVESTMENT INITIATIVE, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 117 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 2% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Oklahoma Native Assets Coalition Inc?
Find your warmest path to Oklahoma Native Assets Coalition Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines