· Public charity
Oklahoma Native Assets Coalition Inc
The organization assists in the development and support of a network of native people who are dedicated to increasing the self-sufficiency and prosperity of their communities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $100,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $466,522 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $366,522 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $93k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| STOCKBRIDGE-MUNSEE BAND OF MOHICAN INDIANS | $28,000 |
| MENOMINEE INDIAN TRIBE OF WI | $20,000 |
| WHITE EARTH INVESTMENT INITIATIVE | $15,000 |
| TLINGIT HAIDA REGIONAL HOUSING AUTHORITY | $10,000 |
| YSLETA DEL SUR PUEBLO | $10,000 |
| WHITE MOUNTAIN APACHE HA | $10,000 |
| HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE PEORIA TRIBE OF INDIANS OF OKLAHOMA | $7,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +401% since the first grant, against -27% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WEWHITE EARTH INVESTMENT INITIATIVE5× · 2019–2024 · $45k · revenue +398%
- TPTHE PEOPLES PARTNERS FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT4× · 2019–2023 · $31k · revenue +852%
- TRTlingit-Haida Regional Housing Authority6× · 2019–2024 · $24k · revenue +32%
Funded once
- CNCHEROKEE NATION COMMERCE SERVone grant, 2018 · $7k
- OFOSAGE FINANCIAL RESOURCES INCone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -27%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide culturally unique initiatives, housing & entrepreneurial programs that will strengthen the american indian community
The Native American Community Development Institute (NACDI) is an American Indian community development intermediary - the first of its kind in the region - created by and for American Indians. NACDI is committed to transforming the…
Provide alternative financing opportunity for Native American entrepreneurs and small businesses in communities in and near Indian Reservations.
Red feather development group partners with american indian nations to develop and implement sustainable solutions to the housing needs within their communities.
The organization seeks to foster economic and financial independence for native people by assisting in the development of personal assets through financial and entrepreneurial education as well as providing access to capital through…
Native Community Development Financial Institution. To foster, facilitate and promote community and economic development among Dry Creek Tribal members, thier families and other Native
To provide higher education opportunities, at the community college level, including vocational and technical training. as a tribal community college, we emphasize the teaching and learning of dakota culture and language toward the…
Cook inlet lending center is a non-profit lending entity established to promote and provide lending products and services to low-income persons in the cook inlet region.
To provide affordable home financing to native americans with low and moderate income.
Research, develop, and administer social and economic development programs to meet the needs of indian and native american communities and individuals residing in the state of california. also for the conservation and preservation of…
Creates homeownership opportunities for the members of the Oglala Sioux Tribe living on, or in the communities adjacent to, the Pine Ridge Reservation. Mazaska is a Native community development financial institution that provides housing…
To grow indigenous-led solar knowledge and solutions with hopi and din (navajo) families and communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Lakota Fund Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is Tlingit-Haida Regional Housing Authority. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: First Nations Development Institute · Native American Agriculture Fund · National Congress of American Indians Fund · Ndn Collective Inc · Oweesta Corporation · Northwest Area Foundation · Enterprise Community Partners Inc · First Peoples Fund · The Bush Foundation · Opportunity Finance Network · Share Our Strength · Boys & Girls Clubs of America
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Oklahoma Native Assets Coalition Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Oklahoma Native Assets Coalition Inc?
Find your warmest path to Oklahoma Native Assets Coalition Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.