Skip to content
Oklahoma Municipal Contractors Asso at a glance

· Public charity

Oklahoma Municipal Contractors Asso

To provide an educational forum for solutions to emerging industry issues, professional standards, and improved safety, integrity, engineering and operational efficiencies among municipal contractors.

$58k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Community Improvement$231kHuman Services$91kHealth$54kReligion$42kRecreation & Sports$41kHousing & Shelter$24kEducation$17kFood & Nutrition$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$8,237
Median grant
1
States reached
$363k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIELDS & FUTURES FOUNDATION$8,237
THE HALO PROJECT$8,237
CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES$8,237
ST LUKE'S FOOD MINISTRY$8,237
JD MCCARTY CENTER FOR CHILDREN$8,237
THE LIVING FAITH MINISTRY$8,237
NOAH'S HEAVEN SEVEN FOUNDATION$8,237
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $53k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 41% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 14%CITY CARE: $10k → 16%CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $10k → 13%CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $8k → 13%CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $6k → 13%BRIDGES OF NORMAN INC: $7k → 13%OKLAHOMA BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN: $7k → 16%THE ANNA'S HOUSE FOUNDATION: $6k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

28%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$149k · 7 repeat orgs$380k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
14

Total granted

$149k
$371k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+17%

Still filing today

57%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FIELDS & FUTURES FOUNDATION
    3× · 2019–2025 · $41k · revenue +59%
  • CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $24k · revenue -4%
  • LF
    LIVING FAITH MINISTRIES INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $24k · revenue 0% · 86% of their budget

Funded once

  • GO
    GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $231k · revenue +9%
  • SL
    ST LUKE'S UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $36k
  • TC
    The Children's Center Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $22k · revenue +141%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Care Center-Child Abuse Response and Evaluation Inc Dba the Care Center

The CARE Center exists to reduce trauma for child abuse victims and their families, coordinate a multidisciplinary approach to child abuse investigations, and provide free, effective child abuse prevention resources and education.

Human Services
2
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

—
3
Family Hope House Inc

Family Hope House empowers families through therapy, education, and advocacy. As Oklahoma's sole adoption competent mental health agency, we support foster and adoptive children for lasting stability and success.

Health
4
Albuquerque Christian Children's Home Inc

The home provides care for children and wards of the court placed for foster home purposes.

Human Services
5
Child Welfare Citizen Board of Can Co Oklahoma Inc

to provide a safe, child-friendly environment for abused children

Human Services
6
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
7
Children's Home of Lubbock and Family Service Agency Inc

Working in creative collaboration to provide quality care that transforms the lives of at-risk children and their families through the active compassion of christ.

Human Services
8
Freedom House Ministries

House of Hope Kansas City is unique, because we work with teens and their parents to find solutions and ultimately, restoration of healthy family relationships. We serve families in crisis with our program for residents to experience the…

Education
9
Midwest Christian Services % Deanna Scott

Provide a home and the needs of children with no other place to go

—
10
Children's Choice Inc

Children's choice is a christian social service agency, which provides specialized community-based services. children's choice serves as a bridge for individuals who are in need of the re-integrative process of family living. intensive,…

Human Services
11
Tulsa Advocates for the Protection of Children

To improve the lives of children and youth in oklahoma's child welfare system by providing resources and building community.

Crime & Legal
12
The Children's Center Foundation

None

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Children & Families Inc; the most unlike its peers is Santas Cause Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC: $231,000 · OtherGREATER OKLAHOMA CITY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INCST LUKE'S UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $36,000 · OtherST LUKE'S UNITED METHODIST CHURCHLIVING FAITH MINISTRIES INC: $24,270 · OtherLIVING FAITH MINISTRIES INCJD MCCARTY CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $18,727 · OtherNOAH'S HEAVEN SEVEN FOUNDATION: $13,780 · OtherST LUKE'S FOOD MINISTRY: $13,780 · Other+6 more: $51,731 · Other+6 moreCENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $24,270 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR …CITY CARE INC: $9,550 · Human ServicesCITY CARE I…BRIDGES OF NORMAN INC: $6,824 · Human ServicesBRIDGES OF …OKLAHOMA BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN INC: $6,824 · Human ServicesOKLAHOMA BA…THE ANNA'S HOUSE FOUNDATION: $5,543 · Human ServicesTHE ANNA'S …FIELDS & FUTURES FOUNDATION: $41,464 · Recreation & SportsThe Children's Center Inc: $22,486 · HealthPath to Miracles Inc: $6,825 · HealthDown Syndrome Association of Central Oklahoma: $5,543 · HealthWILLOW PREGNANCY SUPPORT INC: $9,550 · Arts & Culture
Other$389,288Human Services$53,011Recreation & Sports$41,464Health$34,854Arts & Culture$9,550

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREATER OKLAHOMA CITY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC: $231,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFIELDS & FUTURES FOUNDATION: $41,464 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $24,270 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetLIVING FAITH MINISTRIES INC: $24,270 over 3y, 86% of budgetThe Children's Center Inc: $22,486 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTAS CAUSE INC: $12,368 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetCITY CARE INC: $9,550 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWILLOW PREGNANCY SUPPORT INC: $9,550 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA INC: $9,550 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPath to Miracles Inc: $6,825 over 1y, 11% of budgetBRIDGES OF NORMAN INC: $6,824 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetOKLAHOMA BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN INC: $6,824 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ANNA'S HOUSE FOUNDATION: $5,543 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDown Syndrome Association of Central Oklahoma: $5,543 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma City Communi…Wegener Foundation IncCommunities Foundatio…American Fidelity Fou…Love Meyer Family Fou…Cresap Family Foundat…El and Thelma Gaylord…Inasmuch FoundationServant FoundationFred Jones Family Fou…The Merrick FoundationButterfield Memorial …
Oklahoma City Community Foundation IncOK23.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Wegener Foundation Inc · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · American Fidelity Foundation · Love Meyer Family Foundation · Cresap Family Foundation · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Inasmuch Foundation · Servant Foundation · Fred Jones Family Foundation · The Merrick Foundation · Butterfield Memorial Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Oklahoma Municipal Contractors Asso funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Oklahoma Municipal Contractors Asso. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    6get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Oklahoma Municipal Contractors Asso’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home