Loading…
· Public charity
OKLAHOMA MUNICIPAL CONTRACTORS ASSO
To provide an educational forum for solutions to emerging industry issues, professional standards, and improved safety, integrity, engineering and operational efficiencies among municipal contractors.
$50k
Granted FY2024
9
Grants
1
Communities
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 77% of OKLAHOMA MUNICIPAL CONTRACTORS ASSO’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
potential
2020
pregnancycare
2021
obhcchristministries
2022
—
2023
children
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 9 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$5,543
Median grant
1
States reached
$273k
Total assets
Largest grants
- THE ANNA'S HOUSE FOUNDATION$5,543
- GOSPEL OF LIFE DISCIPLES$5,543
- THE LIVING FAITH MINISTRY$5,543
- CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES$5,543
- BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF OKLAHOM$5,543
- NOAH'S HEAVEN SEVEN FOUNDATION$5,543
- SANTA'S CAUSE$5,543
- ST LUKE'S FOOD MINISTRY$5,543
- DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF OKLAHO$5,543
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 14%. 49% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Child Welfare Citizens Board of Ok
to provide a safe, child-friendly environment for abused children
Human Services
2
Texans Care for Children Inc
Texas Care for Children shapes public policies and brings Texans together to make children a statewide priority. We work so kids can have what they need to be healthy, secure, and thriving and so every Texan can have the best start to life.
Crime & Legal
3
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.
—
4
Casa for Kids Inc
Court appointed special advocates are trained community volunteers appointed by a judge to speak up for abused and neglected children in the court system.
Civil Rights
5
Child Advocacy Center of Central Oklahoma Inc
The purpose of the organization is to provide hope-centered, trauma-informed, child-first services that unite law enforcement, child protective services (state and tribal), prosecutors, mental health professionals, and medical…
Human Services
6
Children's Connections Inc
Improving the quality of life for children in home, child care, and community settings by providing support services to children, parents, and other caregivers. this includes connecting hearts through adoption, caring for those who care…
Human Services
7
Community Children's Ministry
The clinic is a nonprofit ministry providing compassionate, affordable health care to children of midland county families experiencing income challenges.
—
8
Child Advocacy Center of Cullman
Nurturing hope, encouraging health, and promoting healing in troubled families through community collaboration, communication and cooperation
Human Services
9
Casa of Southwest Oklahoma Inc
Court Advocate for Abused and Neglected Children
Crime & Legal
10
Oklahoma City Family Justice Center Inc
The mission of the okcfjc is to provide protection, hope and healing to those impacted by domestic and family violence in the oklahoma city community. the organization provides a centrally located facility which co-locates and coordinates…
Crime & Legal
11
Centers for Children and Families Inc
Our agency improves the quality of life of individuals, children, and families in the permian basin through therapeutic counseling, parent education, and a supervised visitation and exchange program. we also provide post-adoption services…
Human Services
12
South Central Casa of Oklahoma Inc
Recruit, screen, train and monitor volunteers to serve as court appointed special advocates for abused and neglected children in the judicial system.
Civil Rights
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Children & Families Inc and the most unlike its peers is Santas Cause Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$364,136Human Services$44,774Health$29,311Recreation & Sports$22,737Arts & Culture$9,550
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds FIELDS & FUTURES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDRENS CENTER REHABILITATION HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES ↗
- Who funds MAKE A WISH OKLAHOMA ↗
- Who funds WILLOW PREGNANCY SUPPORT ↗
- Who funds CITY CARE ↗
- Who funds SANTA'S CAUSE ↗
- Who funds PATH TO MIRACLES INC ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds BRIDGES OF NORMAN INC ↗
- Who funds THE ANNA'S HOUSE FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Oklahoma City Community Foundation IncOK20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · American Fidelity Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Wegener Foundation Inc · Love Meyer Family Foundation · Servant Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation OKLAHOMA MUNICIPAL CONTRACTORS ASSO funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: PATH TO MIRACLES INC.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~13 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 474233649 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on PATH TO MIRACLES INC, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 13 months of cash on hand.
- WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 11% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Oklahoma Municipal Contractors Asso?
Find your warmest path to Oklahoma Municipal Contractors Asso through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines