· Public charity
Oklahoma Blood Institute
Oklahoma Blood Institute's (obi) mission is to be the donor-to-patient lifeline by providing our communities and medical partners security by meeting blood transfusion and health care needs.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $346,699 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $501,053 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $154,354 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $11k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $42k
- $250k+1 grant · $294k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Global Blood Fund | $293,643 |
| United Way of Central Oklahoma | $12,436 |
| St Anthony's Foundation | $10,000 |
| Oklahoma County Medical Society | $10,000 |
| Tulsa Regional Chamber - Tulsa's Future | $10,000 |
| Regional Food Bank of Oklahoma | $5,620 |
| Oklahoma City Museum of Art | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 23% of Oklahoma Blood Institute’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in OK; read by stated purpose it is 77% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +4% since the first grant, against -39% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OBOklahoma Blood Institute Foundation2× · 2020–2021 · $3.8M · revenue +661% · 98% of their budget
- UWUnited Way of Central Oklahoma Inc5× · 2019–2025 · $70k · revenue +8%
- GOGREATER OKLAHOMA CITY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC3× · 2018–2020 · $31k · revenue +4%
Funded once
- NONorthwest Oklahoma Blood Instituteone grant, 2021 · $150k · revenue -72% · 32% of their budget
- TCTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION AT SAINT FRANCISone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +16%
- IHINTEGRIS Health Foundation Incone grant, 2018 · $7k · revenue -19%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.
The mission of the Oklahoma Hospital Association is to promote the welfare of the public by representing its members and advocating on their behalf, providing services to assist its members in meeting the health care needs of their…
The mission of the osteopathic founders foundation is to support osteopathic medical education, to enhance the public's understanding of osteopathic medicine, and to improve the health of the community through projects consistent with the…
The mission of the Foundation for a Healthy Oklahoma is exclusively for charitable, educational, and scientific purposes. The activities of the Corporation may include: (A) Promoting the good health and welfare (continued on Schedule O)
Osma's vision is to be the leading voice in health care for oklahoma's patients, families and physicians. osma's mission is better health for oklahoma.
The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.
The dean mcgee eye institute is dedicated to serving all oklahomans and the global community through excellence and leadership in patient care, education and vision research.
The State Chamber Research Foundation strives to support Oklahoma's growth and increase prosperity for all Oklahomans. We create solution orientated programming, advance research and policy, and provide sound data geared to advancing…
To extend the presence and healing ministry of christ in all we do.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma Blood Institute Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Northwest Oklahoma Blood Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Oklahoma Blood Institute Foundation ↗
- Who funds Global Blood Fund ↗
- Who funds Northwest Oklahoma Blood Institute ↗
- Who funds United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc ↗
- Who funds GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR TULSAS FUTURE ↗
- Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 480 LAST FRONTIER COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds THE ST ANTHONY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION AT SAINT FRANCIS ↗
- Who funds INTEGRIS Health Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA BIOSCIENCE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds 918 Fully Involved ↗
- Who funds BCA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY MUSEUM OF ART INC FKA OKLAHOMA CITY ART MUSEUM ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rainbolt Family Foundation · Crowe & Dunlevy Foundation Inc · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · American Fidelity Foundation · Inasmuch Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Ad Astra Foundation · The Ann Lacy Foundation · Fred Jones Family Foundation · The Merrick Foundation · Arvest Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Oklahoma Blood Institute funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.