Skip to content
Oklahoma Alliance of Ymcas at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Oklahoma Alliance of Ymcas

The OKLAHOMA ALLIANCE OF YMCAS represent the collective impact of all 9 independent oklahoma ymcas.

$8.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$4.2M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Human Services$5.1MRecreation & Sports$1.2MPublic Benefit$496kCommunity Improvement$474kYouth Development$7k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $250k+5 grants · $8.1M
$319,693
Median grant
3
States reached
$543k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YMCA OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY$4,217,010
YMCA OF GREATER TULSA$2,628,107
DENNY PRICE FAMILY YMCA$465,459
NOBLE COUNTY FAMILY YMCA$455,677
SHAWNEE FAMILY YMCA$319,693
YMCA OF NORTHWEST LOUISIANA$10,000
HOT SPRINGS YMCA$10,000
RICHARD KANE FAMILY YMCA$7,249
YMCA OF LAWTON$6,750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $14.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC: $15k → 14%NOBLE COUNTY FAMILY YMCA: $456k → 12%RICHARD KANE FAMILY YMCA: $29k → 14%YMCA OF GREATER TULSA: $2.6M → 15%DENNY PRICE FAMILY YMCA OF ENID OKLAHOMA: $509k → 16%YMCA OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY: $4.2M → 16%SHAWNEE FAMILY YMCA: $320k → 19%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $10k → 17%YMCA OF NORTHWEST LOUISIANA: $10k → 22%NOBLE COUNTY FAMILY YMCA: $175k → 12%YMCA OF GREATER TULSA: $2.9M → 15%DENNY PRICE FAMILY YMCA: $465k → 16%YMCA OF LAWTON: $7k → 16%YMCA OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY: $425k → 16%HOT SPRINGS YMCA: $10k → 17%YMCA OF NORTHWEST LOUISIANA: $10k → 22%NOBLE COUNTY FAMILY YMCA: $101k → 12%RICHARD KANE FAMILY YMCA: $7k → 14%YMCA OF GREATER TULSA: $733k → 15%DENNY PRICE FAMILY YMCA OF ENID OKLAHOMA: $418k → 16%YMCA OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY: $288k → 16%SHAWNEE FAMILY YMCA: $13k → 19%HOT SPRINGS YMCA: $10k → 17%YMCA OF NORTHWEST LOUISIANA: $10k → 22%DENNY PRICE FAMILY YMCA: $298k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14M · 8 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +72% since the first grant, against -73% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
14

Total granted

$14M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
-73%

Still filing today

100%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TY
    THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER TULSA
    3× · 2021–2025 · $6.3M · revenue +72%
  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY
    3× · 2021–2025 · $4.9M · revenue +85%
  • TD
    THE DENNY PRICE FAMILY YMCA OF ENID OKLAHOMA INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +132%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $474k
  • GL
    GRAND LAKE FAMILY YMCA
    one grant, 2024 · $395k
  • CC
    CLEVELAND COUNTY FAMILY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $154k · revenue -94%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Shasta County Young Men's Christian Association

The shasta family ymca strengthens community through programs and activities that create a healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

Human Services
2
Lake County Young Men's Christian Association

The mission of the lake county ymca is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

Human Services
3
The Young Mens Christian Association of Greater Des Moines

The y's programs focus on improving people's spiritual, intellectual, and physical well-being to support people as they actualize their fullest potential. the ymca serves community members of all abilities, ages, cultural backgrounds,…

—
4
Young Men's Christian Association of Danville Virginia

The mission of the ymca is to put christian principles in to practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all. the association is a charitable, community service organization founded and led by volunteers from the…

Human Services
5
Young Men's Christian Association of Central New Mexico

The mission of the ymca of central new mexico is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build a healthy spirit, mind and body for all. for over 100 years, the ymca of central new mexico has served our community…

—
6
Young Men's Christian Association of the Virginia Peninsulas

Our mission is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all. our focus is on youth development, healthy living and social responsibility. we help kids succeed, prepare teens…

Human Services
7
Ymca of Greater Brandywine

To put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind, and body for all.

Human Services
8
Young Men's Christian Association of Pierce and Kitsap Counties

The mission of the YMCA is to put Christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind, and body for all. We are an inclusive organization, serving all people regardless of background, religion, beliefs,…

Human Services
9
Young Men's Christian Association of Brainerd

The mission of the brainerd family ymca is to enhance the lives in the brainerd lakes area by connecting individuals and families with opportunities based on christian values that build a healthy spirit, mind, & body.

Human Services
10
Family Ymca of Emporia-Greensville Inc

The Family YMCA of Emporia-Greensville's purpose is to advance our cause of strengthening community through youth development, healthy living and social responsibility. The YMCA is a powerful association of men, women, and children…

Recreation & Sports
11
Okmulgee County Family Ymca

The mission of the okmulgee county family ymca is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

—
12
Mcpherson Family Ymca

Mcpherson family ymca's mission is to advance our cause of strengthening community through youth development, healthy living, and social responsibility. the ymca is a powerful association of men, women, and children committed to bringing…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Men's Christian Assoc of Shawnee Ok; the most unlike its peers is Ymca Foundation of the Pikes Peak Region. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER TULSA: $6,307,447 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER TULSAYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY: $4,930,227 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITYTHE DENNY PRICE FAMILY YMCA OF ENID OKLAHOMA INC: $1,690,301 · Human ServicesTHE DENNY PRICE FAMILY YMCA OF ENID OKLAHOMA INCNOBLE COUNTY YMCA: $731,447 · Human Services+6 more: $450,293 · Human ServicesIndividual grant recipient: $474,484 · OtherIndividua…GRAND LAKE FAMILY YMCA: $395,366 · OtherGRAND LAK…CLEVELAND COUNTY FAMILY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $153,923 · OtherCLEVELAND…YMCA FOUNDATION OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION: $63,351 · OtherGreat Plains Family YMCA Inc: $51,940 · Other+8 more: $123,890 · Other+8 more
Human Services$14,109,715Other$1,262,954

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER TULSA: $6,307,447 over 3y, 12% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY: $4,930,227 over 3y, 8.2% of budgetTHE DENNY PRICE FAMILY YMCA OF ENID OKLAHOMA INC: $1,690,301 over 4y, 17% of budgetNOBLE COUNTY YMCA: $731,447 over 3y, 21% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOC OF SHAWNEE OK: $332,293 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCLEVELAND COUNTY FAMILY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $153,923 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetGreat Plains Family YMCA Inc: $51,940 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetFAMILY YMCA OF BARTLESVILLE: $36,247 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCICATION DBA HOT SPRINGS FAMILY YMCA: $30,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetYMCA of Northwest Louisiana: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTexas County Family YMCA Inc: $16,293 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetYMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC: $15,003 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF LAWTON OKLAHOMA: $6,750 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Council of Y…Renaissance Charitabl…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
National Council of YMCAs of the USAIL25.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Council of YMCAs of the USA · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Oklahoma Alliance of Ymcas funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Oklahoma Alliance of Ymcas. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Oklahoma Alliance of Ymcas?

    Find your warmest path to Oklahoma Alliance of Ymcas through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Oklahoma Alliance of Ymcas’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home