How much does Ohio Network of Children's Advocacy Centers give?

Ohio Network of Children's Advocacy Centers reported 39 grants totaling $1,253,856 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 5 and 30 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2024.

What does Ohio Network of Children's Advocacy Centers fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Crime & Legal (54%), Health (34%), Human Services (11%).

Who are Ohio Network of Children's Advocacy Centers's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Dayton Children's Hospital ($1.1M), Nationwide Childrens Hospital Inc ($534k), Children's Hospital Medical Center ($533k).

Does Ohio Network of Children's Advocacy Centers fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 30% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Which funders back the same organizations as Ohio Network of Children's Advocacy Centers?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include National Children's Alliance Inc, Charities Aid Foundation America, Amazonsmile Foundation.

Where is Ohio Network of Children's Advocacy Centers based?

Ohio Network of Children's Advocacy Centers is based in OH.

Ohio Network of Children's Advocacy Centers

Ohio Network of Children's Advocacy Centers at a glance Also receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Ohio Network of Children's Advocacy Centers

Promote the establishment and success of multi-disciplinary teams and children's advocacy centers by providing support, education, and networking opportunities to enhance ohio's respones to child abuse.

$1.3M

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$63k

Largest

01What it funds

01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Crime & Legal$4.2MHealth$2.6MHuman Services$891kEmployment$23k

02FY2025 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k6 grants · $43k
$10k–50k27 grants · $867k
$50k–250k6 grants · $344k

$34,401

Median grant

States reached

$2.2M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
HOPE'S PLACE	$62,564
CENTER FOR FAMILY SAFETY AND	$59,293
CHILDREN'S NETWORK OF STARK COUNTY	$57,281
MAYERSON CENTER FOR SAFE AND	$57,215
NATIONAL CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE	$55,526
CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER (COLUMBIANA	$52,000
CANOPY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER	$47,261
CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER	$46,350
SUMMIT COUNTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY	$42,679
WAYNE COUNTY CAC	$40,806
MICHAEL'S HOUSE OF GREENE COUNTY	$40,360
NOAH'S HOPE CHILD ADVOCACY	$38,157
CLARK COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER	$37,701
KID'S PLACE (LICKING COUNTY)	$37,385
HARMONY HOUSE	$36,748

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $938k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$7.7M · 34 repeat orgs$88k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$7.7M

$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%

Still filing today

76%

100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthCrime & LegalHuman ServicesEducationOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

DC
DAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
4× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +140%
CH
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER
4× · 2017–2025 · $533k · revenue +53%
CH
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER OF AKRON
4× · 2017–2025 · $485k · revenue +76%

Funded once

SA
SURVIVOR ADVOCACY OUTREACH PROGRAM
one grant, 2024 · $40k · revenue 0%

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Child Advocacy Center

To combat child sexual and physical abuse by providing services to children and families in a safe enviroment.

Human Services

The Childrens House

To reduce trauma to children who have experienced abuse as well as their families by providing a safe and supportive environment through a collaboration of community agencies.

—

Children's Advocacy Center of Comal Coun

To provide a neutral, child-friendly agency community that facilitates a multidisciplinary approach to the prevention, detection, investigation, and treatment of child abuse.

Crime & Legal

Children's Advocacy Center of Ottawa Countyinc

Providing advocacy services for child abuse victims.

Crime & Legal

Rusk County Childrens Advocacy Center Inc

To prevent, treat, and reduce the trauma of the investigative process for child abuse victims and their non-offending family members.

Crime & Legal

Vermilion County Child Advocacy Center

Perform forensic interviews on minor children in response to calls from either the Department of Children and Family Services or law enforcement, regarding potential abuse of the child. The Center works as an advocate for the child with…

Crime & Legal

Childrens Advocacy Center of Independence County Inc

To empower, protect and heal victims of child abuse. to decrease trauma in child abuse victims and increase prosecution success through a multidisciplinary team approach with all agencies involved.

Philanthropy

Morgan County Child Advocacy Center

To provide a safe caring place to evaluate any child who may have been abused

Crime & Legal

Child Advocacy Center Inc

The primary service that the cac provides is a safe, child-friendly location for interviewing of children and coordination of referral programs when an allegation of sexual abuse and/or severe physical abuse has occurred.

Crime & Legal

Guadalupe County Children's Advocacy Center

To advocate for and provide services to children and families when there are allegations of abuse and neglect throughout the investigation,prosecution, treatment, and prevention of child abuse, and to reduce the trauma to childrent with…

Crime & Legal

Childrens Advocacy Centers of Mississippi

The center supports and advocates on behalf of children's advocacy centers (cac) and multidisciplinary teams (mdt) statewide. cac's are facility based programs, which utilize an mdt approach (including child protective services, law…

Human Services

Marion County Child Advocacy Center

The goal of the Marion County Child Advocacy Center is to provide a safe place for children who are victims of sexual and physical abuse to have their stories clearly heard and begin the healing process. The Marion County Child Advocacy…

Crime & Legal

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Child & Family Advocacy Inc; the most unlike its peers is Athens County Child Advocacy Cntr. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

27/27

Grantees still filing

21/27

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Health$3,105,049Other$2,218,072Crime & Legal$1,321,182Human Services$937,585Education$178,105

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Children's Alliance IncDC31.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Children's Alliance Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Amazonsmile Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ohio Network of Children's Advocacy Centers funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ohio Network of Children's Advocacy Centers. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Ohio Network of Children's Advocacy Centers’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home