Skip to content
Ohio Capital Corporation for Housing at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Ohio Capital Corporation for Housing

Advance the preservation, production and management of affordable housing through collaborative partnership and innovative thought leadership.

$4.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$2.5M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$34MCommunity Improvement$271kHuman Services$230kArts & Culture$47kRecreation & Sports$37kPhilanthropy$25kHealth$12kPublic Benefit$10k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $3,834,206, the rows itemized in this filing. The $4,089,746 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $255,540 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
  • $250k+2 grants · $3.7M
$1,181,002
Median grant
1
States reached
$210M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OHIO CAPITAL IMPACT CORPORATION$2,543,204
OHIO CAPITAL FINANCE CORPORATION$1,181,002
BHE LLC$100,000
OBL BANK SERVIES$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CORPORATION FOR SUPPORTIVE HOUSING: $50k → 17%HANLEY WOOD MEDIA INC: $21k → 14%NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE AND LOCAL EQUITY FUNDS: $10k → 21%REACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $5k → 12%BHE LLC: $100k → 7%HOPEWELL HEALTH CENTERS INC: $6k → 14%OHIO CAPITAL IMPACT CORPORATION: $5.3M → 15%NEIGHBORHOOD PROPERTIES INC: $12k → 18%JOHN CLEM RECOVERY HOUSE: $6k → 22%KENTUCKY BANKERS ASSOCIATION: $16k → 15%HANLEY WOOD MEDIA INC: $21k → 14%OHIO CAPITAL IMPACT CORPORATION: $4.6M → 15%KENTUCKY BANKERS ASSOCIATION: $16k → 15%HANLEY WOOD MEDIA INC: $6k → 14%OHIO CAPITAL IMPACT CORPORATION: $4.4M → 15%KENTUCKY BANKERS ASSOCIATION: $14k → 15%CSBS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%OHIO CAPITAL IMPACT CORPORATION: $3.6M → 15%KENTUCKY BANKERS ASSOCIATION: $14k → 15%OHIO CAPITAL IMPACT CORPORATION: $3.6M → 15%OHIO CAPITAL IMPACT CORPORATION: $2.4M → 15%OHIO CAPITAL FINANCE CORPORATION: $1.5M → 15%OHIO CAPITAL FINANCE CORPORATION: $1.5M → 15%OHIO CAPITAL IMPACT CORPORATION: $1.3M → 15%OHIO CAPITAL FINANCE CORPORATION: $625k → 15%OHIO CAPITAL FINANCE CORPORATION: $599k → 15%WODA GROUP LLC: $200k → 15%OHIO CAPITAL FINANCE CORPORATION: $165k → 15%PELOTONIA: $11k → 15%PELOTONIA: $9k → 15%PELOTONIA: $8k → 15%PELOTONIA: $7k → 15%COHHIO: $5k → 15%OHIO BANKERS LEAGUE: $22k → 15%OHIO BANKERS LEAGUE: $22k → 15%OBL BANK SERVIES: $20k → 15%OHIO BANKERS LEAGUE: $12k → 15%OHIO BANKER'S LEAGUE: $11k → 15%OBL BANK SERVIES: $10k → 15%OHIO BANKERS LEAGUE: $8k → 15%OHIO CAPITAL IMPACT CORPORATION: $2.5M → 15%OHIO CAPITAL FINANCE CORPORATION: $1.2M → 15%OHIO HOUSING COUNCIL: $50k → 15%COMMUNITY PROPERTIES IMPACT CORPORATION: $89k → 15%COMMUNITY PROPERTIES IMPACT CORPORATION: $40k → 15%COMMUNITY PROPERTIES IMPACT CORPORATION: $40k → 15%COLUMBUS FOUNDATION: $15k → 15%COLUMBUS FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$34M · 9 repeat orgs$353k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
10

Total granted

$34M
$353k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+40%

Still filing today

67%
90%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Housing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementHealthEducationPublic BenefitEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OC
    OHIO CAPITAL FINANCE CORPORATION
    6× · 2017–2024 · $5.5M · revenue +115%
  • OB
    OHIO BANKERS LEAGUE
    5× · 2017–2021 · $75k · revenue +25%
  • KB
    KENTUCKY BANKERS ASSOCIATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $59k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • WG
    WODA GROUP LLC
    one grant, 2021 · $200k
  • OH
    OHIO HOUSING COUNCIL
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue 0%
  • CORPORATION FOR SUPPORTIVE HOUSINGgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +128%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbus Housing Initiative Inc

Stabilize neighborhoods through establishing financing, education, rehabilitation of existing housing and development of new housing

Housing & Shelter
2
The Affordable Housing Trust for Columbus and Franklin County

Facilitate and invest in developments designed to: create and preserve affordable homeownership and rental housing; strengthen and stabilize neighborhoods; support working households, seniors and special needs populations.

Housing & Shelter
3
Oucu Financial Credit Union Fka Ohio University Credit Union

Provide financial services to its members.

—
4
Empowering and Strengthening Ohio's People Inc

Empowering and strengthening ohio's people (esop) helps adults in all stages of life achieve and maintain financial wellness and housing stability.

Housing & Shelter
5
Ohio Conference of Community Development Inc

Occd's purpose is to develop, implement and improve federal, state and local programs for community development and to develop and improve the professional standards and practices of all phases of public administration which are related…

—
6
Ohio Housing Authorities Conference

OHAC's mission is to foster and promote affordable housing in the state of Ohio through:1) education and training of its members and general public; 2) exchange of information; 3) mutual support; 4) collaborate efforts.

Housing & Shelter
7
Affordable Housing Alliance of Central Ohio

Ensuring that everyone in central ohio has a safe, decent, affordable home through advocating for the needs of clients, low and moderate-income people living in central ohio, impacting public policy, and working to enhance system…

Housing & Shelter
8
The Home Ownership Center of Greater Cincinnati in

The home ownership center is a non-profit that has been serving the cincinnati metro area since 1973, and is a member of the neighbor works network.

Housing & Shelter
9
Chn Housing Capital

Chn housing capital is a certified community development financial institution serving low-income individuals and distressed communities guided by the belief that homeownership should be within everyone's reach.

Human Services
10
Columbus Board of Realtors Inc

The Columbus Board of REALTORS is a visible advocate of the real estate industry, providing members with career building education and enhancing the quality of life in our community.

—
11
Columbus Association of Realtors

The columbus association of realtors is a local level, not-for-profit trade association. founded in 1908, columbus association of realtors is comprised of more than 9,100 real estate professionals engaged in residential sales and leasing,…

—
12
Philanthropy Ohio

To lead and equip ohio philanthropy to be effective partners for change in our communities.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ohio Capital Impact Corporation; the most unlike its peers is John Clem Recovery House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OHIO CAPITAL IMPACT CORPORATION: $27,803,548 · Housing & ShelterOHIO CAPITAL IMPACT CORPORATION+3 more: $223,582 · Housing & ShelterOHIO CAPITAL FINANCE CORPORATION: $5,547,716 · Community ImprovementOHIO CAPITAL FINAN…+2 more: $124,649 · Community ImprovementWODA GROUP LLC: $200,000 · OtherBHE LLC: $127,545 · OtherKENTUCKY BANKERS ASSOCIATION: $59,000 · OtherHANLEY WOOD MEDIA INC: $46,500 · OtherOBL BANK SERVIES: $30,000 · Other+2 more: $15,834 · OtherOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $36,712 · EducationCOLUMBUS FOUNDATION: $25,000 · PhilanthropyNEIGHBORHOOD PROPERTIES INC: $11,667 · HealthJOHN CLEM RECOVERY HOUSE: $5,834 · HealthCSBS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Public BenefitCOALITION ON HOMELESSNESS AND HOUSING IN OHIO: $5,000 · Employment
Housing & Shelter$28,027,130Community Improvement$5,672,365Other$478,879Education$36,712Philanthropy$25,000Health$17,501Public Benefit$10,000Employment$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOHIO CAPITAL IMPACT CORPORATION: $27,803,548 over 8y, 99% of budgetOHIO CAPITAL FINANCE CORPORATION: $5,547,716 over 6y, 16% of budgetCOMMUNITY PROPERTIES IMPACT CORPORATION: $168,582 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetOHIO BANKERS LEAGUE: $74,649 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetKENTUCKY BANKERS ASSOCIATION: $59,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetOHIO HOUSING COUNCIL: $50,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetCORPORATION FOR SUPPORTIVE HOUSING: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $36,712 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBUS FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD PROPERTIES INC: $11,667 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE AND LOCAL EQUITY FUNDS: $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCSBS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHOPEWELL HEALTH CENTERS INC: $5,834 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN CLEM RECOVERY HOUSE: $5,834 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetREACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOALITION ON HOMELESSNESS AND HOUSING IN OHIO: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ohio Capital Impact C…Amazonsmile Foundation
Ohio Capital Impact CorporationOH17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ohio Capital Impact Corporation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ohio Capital Corporation for Housing funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ohio Capital Corporation for Housing. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 18%
  • Reach Community Development Inc: 18% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ohio Capital Corporation for Housing’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home