Skip to content

· Private foundation

O Max Gardner Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$10k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$271kCrime & Legal$30kHealth$15kAnimals$6kHuman Services$6kYouth Development$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kEmployment$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$353k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MENTAL HEALTH ASSOC OF CLEVELAND C$5,000
A'S FOR KIDS NON PROFIE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%N C JUSTICE CENTER: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$286k · 4 repeat orgs$66k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
18

Total granted

$286k
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+13%

Still filing today

25%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEmploymentAnimalsYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GU
    GARDNER-WEBB UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2018–2023 · $249k · revenue +20%
  • NC
    NATIONAL CONSUMER BANKRUPTCY RIGHTS
    5× · 2017–2022 · $30k
  • CC
    COMPASS CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILI
    2× · 2021–2022 · $4k

Funded once

  • C
    CHBCF
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +13%
  • SC
    SHELBY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way of Cleveland County Inc

The United Way of Cleveland County helps people by uniting resources and programs to responsibly meet the needs of our community.

Philanthropy
2
North Carolina Business Leaders for Educ

The mission of north carolina business leaders for education (dba best nc) is to unite an engaged and informed business perspective to dramatically transform and improve north carolina's education system. our goal is for every student to…

Education
3
Charlotte Christian College & Theological Seminary

To educate, train, and develop ministers, evangelists, missionaries, and other people who are going to enter the Christian ministry. Educate ministers and missionaries to serve the Lord.

Religion
4
Boys and Girls Clubs of Central Carolina

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

Youth Development
5
Junior Achievement of Central Carolinas Inc

Junior achievement is the world's largest organization dedicated to educating private and public school students in grades k-12 about entrepreneurship, workforce readiness, and financial literacy, through experiential, hands-on programs.

International
6
North Carolina Council On Economic Education Inc

The nccee provides economic and financial education for educators and students throughout north carolina. this mission is accomplished through standards based workshops and a variety of resources for educators, academic competitions for…

Social Science
7
Charlotte Christian School

Charlotte christian school is a christ-centered, college preparatory school, equipping and developing students to effectively integrate biblical truth and learning nto their daily lives and to impact the culture for christ.

—
8
UrbanPromise Charlotte

Provide Charlotte's low-income children and youth with the academic, spiritual, and social development necessary to become Christian leaders determined to restore their communities.

Youth Development
9
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
10
Carolina College of Biblical Studies

Carolina college of biblical studies exists to disciple christ-followers, through biblical higher education, for a lifetime of effective servant leadership.

Education
11
Student U

Our mission is to empower and equip first-generation college students in durham public schools, their families, and educators to become the leaders that will transform our city.

Education
12
Greater Cleveland Volunteers

Greater cleveland volunteers enriches the community and indivuduals through volunteer service. volunteers age 18 and older are recruited and placed in the agency's programs or referred to local nonprofit or public organizations to help…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys and Girls Club Cleveland County; the most unlike its peers is Feeding Kids Cleveland County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GARDNER-WEBB UNIVERSITY: $249,340 · EducationGARDNER-WEBB UNIVERSITYNATIONAL CONSUMER BANKRUPTCY RIGHTS: $30,000 · OtherNATIONAL CONSUMER BANKRUPT…CHBCF: $10,000 · OtherCHBCFSHELBY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT: $5,000 · OtherSHELBY CITY POLICE DEPARTM…Individual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMENTAL HEALTH ASSOC OF CLEVELAND C: $5,000 · OtherMENTAL HEALTH ASSOC OF CLE…CLEVELAND COUNTY MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $5,000 · OtherCLEVELAND COUNTY MEMORIAL …A'S FOR KIDS NON PROFIE: $5,000 · OtherA'S FOR KIDS NON PROFIECOMPASS CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILI: $3,500 · OtherEARL SCRUGGS CENTER: $3,000 · Other+8 more: $9,750 · Other+8 moreYOUNG LIFE: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentHOPE RENOVATIONS SPENCER: $5,000 · EmploymentVETS TO VETS UNITED INC: $5,000 · AnimalsFeeding Kids Cleveland County Inc: $2,500 · Food & NutritionCHAPEL HILL-CARRBORO PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $2,500 · PhilanthropyNORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER: $1,000 · Human Services
Education$249,340Other$81,250Youth Development$5,000Employment$5,000Animals$5,000Food & Nutrition$2,500Philanthropy$2,500Human Services$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGARDNER-WEBB UNIVERSITY: $249,340 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE RENOVATIONS SPENCER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetVETS TO VETS UNITED INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetFeeding Kids Cleveland County Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCHAPEL HILL-CARRBORO PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBoys and Girls Club Cleveland County: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GARDNER-WEBB UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds HOPE RENOVATIONS SPENCER ↗
  • Who funds VETS TO VETS UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding Kids Cleveland County Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHAPEL HILL-CARRBORO PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Boys and Girls Club Cleveland County ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Duke Energy FoundationNC12.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Duke Energy Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization O Max Gardner Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from O Max Gardner Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on O Max Gardner’s filings →

    More from the funding graph