Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

O'Donnell Family Charitable Foundat Foundation C/O Jim O'Donnell

Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$349k
Granted FY2018
9
Grants FY2018
2
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172018.

Education$201kHuman Services$155kHealth$124kYouth Development$13kArts & Culture$4kInternational$1kRecreation & Sports$1kFood & Nutrition$750Other$0
02FY2018 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k4 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $21k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $325k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YWCA$150,000
SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$100,000
NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY$75,000
ROTARY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$10,500
PROVIDE$10,000
KCSARC$1,500
BAINBRIDGE ISLAND PARKS FOUNDATION$1,000
CAST FOR KIDS$500
NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY$200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $750) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $750 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$389k · 5 repeat orgs$112k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
15

Total granted

$389k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-75%
+24%

Still filing today

20%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $102k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
Arts & CultureHealthCivil RightsHuman ServicesAnimalsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NM
    NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $205k
  • Y
    YWCA
    2× · 2017–2018 · $152k
  • PI
    PROVIDE INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $17k · revenue -75%

Funded once

  • SEATTLE ARTS AND LECTURESgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +75%
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • GP
    GLOBAL PARTNERSHIPSgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +116%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Siff

Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.

Youth Development
2
Seattle Public Library Foundation

The seattle public library foundation inspires the community's philanthropic support, advocacy for, and pride in the library.

Education
3
Great Peninsula Conservancy

Preserve in perpetuity the natural habitats, rural landscapes, and open spaces of the great peninsula of washington's puget sound.

Environment
4
Seattle Symphony Orchestra Inc

To present symphonic music of the highest quality in a distinctive way for the cultural enrichment, education, engagement and enjoyment of the people of our community.

Arts & Culture
5
Portland Public Library

Portland Public Library is a welcoming cultural center that brings people together and connects them with trusted resources, ideas, experiences, and information. We build a stronger community by inspiring learning, creativity, and…

Education
6
Friends of the Seattle Public Library

The Friends of the Seattle Public Library's mission is to elevate the Library and inspire the love of reading in our communities.

Education
7
Kqed Inc

See schedule okqed serves the people of northern california with a community-supported alternative to commercial media, providing the knowledge needed to make informed decisions; convening community dialogue; bringing the arts to everyone;…

Arts & Culture
8
San Francisco Film Society

SFFILM is a nonprofit organization whose mission ensures independent voices in film are welcomed, heard, and given the resources to thrive. SFFILM connects and inspires audiences, students and teachers, and filmmakers through our film…

9
Seattle Opera

To thrill, inspire and educate through the shared experience of opera. seattle opera is vital to the dynamic cultural and civic life of our region and to the evolution of opera across the world.

Arts & Culture
10
Seattle Foundation

Seattle foundation's mission is to ignite powerful and rewarding philanthropy to make greater seattle a stronger, more vibrant community for all.

Philanthropy
11
Washington Society of Certified Public a

We are a community of cpas and financial professionals cultivating authentic relationships, unique learning experiences, and purposeful advocacy for our future.

12
Artist Trust

Artist Trust supports the livelihoods of artists working in all disciplines to create a more vibrant and equitable Washington State.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cascade Public Media and the most unlike its peers is Desert Labrador Retriever Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $205,140 · OtherNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETYYWCA — $152,378 · OtherYWCA+8 more — $17,550 · OtherSWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $100,000 · HealthSWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER…+2 more — $1,500 · HealthPROVIDE INC — $17,000 · Civil RightsSEATTLE ARTS AND LECTURES — $3,000 · Arts & CultureBAINBRIDGE ISLAND PARKS & TRAILS FOUNDATION — $1,000 · Arts & CultureOREGON SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION INC — $500 · Arts & CultureSeattle Chamber Music Festival — $500 · Arts & CultureCASCADE PUBLIC MEDIA — $250 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $150 · Arts & CultureSAINT FRANCES CABRINI CHARITABLE SERVICES — $750 · Human ServicesDESERT LABRADOR RETRIEVER RESCUE INC — $500 · AnimalsPAGE AHEAD CHILDRENS LITERACY PRGM — $500 · Education
Other$375,068Health$101,500Civil Rights$17,000Arts & Culture$5,400Human Services$750Animals$500Education$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPROVIDE INC — $17,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSEATTLE ARTS AND LECTURES — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL PARTNERSHIPS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAINBRIDGE ISLAND PARKS & TRAILS FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDESERT LABRADOR RETRIEVER RESCUE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSeattle Chamber Music Festival — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAGE AHEAD CHILDRENS LITERACY PRGM — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCASCADE PUBLIC MEDIA — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF SEATTLE — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMonterey Jazz Festival — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA14.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization O'Donnell Family Charitable Foundat Foundation C/O Jim O'Donnell funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Oregon Shakespeare Festival Association Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph