Skip to content
O'Callaghan Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

O'Callaghan Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$84kHuman Services$59kRecreation & Sports$27kInternational$27kHousing & Shelter$23kHealth$20kCivil Rights$14kYouth Development$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $19k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$658k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OREGON FOOD BANK$18,584
HAWAII FOOD BANK ( THE FOOD BASKET)$5,667
LINCOLN COUNTY FOOD SHARE$4,000
ARC OF KONA$2,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$2,000
CHURCH AT THE PARK$2,000
FRIENDS OF NEWPORT PARKS AND RECREATION INC$2,000
MARION-POLK FOOD SHARE$1,667
SALEM FOR REFUGEES$1,000
FRIENDS OF NEWPORT SENIOR ACTIVITY CENTER$1,000
HOSPICE OF KONA$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
ISAAC'S ROOM$1,000
GOOD NEIGHBOR CENTER$1,000
YMCA$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 70% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LOOKING GLASS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $2k → 15%CLACKAMAS WOMENS SERVICES: $3k → 8%Looking Glass Community Services: $950 → 15%CLACKAMAS WOMENS SERVICES: $2k → 8%Street Roots: $1k → 12%LOOKING GLASS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $500 → 15%Looking Glass Community Services: $500 → 15%STREET ROOTS: $782 → 12%Looking Glass Community Services: $500 → 15%Family Promise of Tualatin Valley: $3k → 8%Street Roots: $750 → 12%Looking Glass Community Services: $445 → 15%HOSPICE OF KONA: $2k → 15%STREET ROOTS: $412 → 12%Hospice of Kona: $1k → 15%HOSPICE OF KONA: $1k → 15%Family Building Blocks Inc: $1k → 14%Family Building Blocks Inc: $1k → 14%Family Building Blocks: $1k → 14%My Sisters Place: $1k → 16%My Sisters Place: $250 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
MA
OR
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
TN
DC
HI
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$246k · 40 repeat orgs$69k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +65% since the first grant, against +60% for those funded once.

40 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
34

Total granted

$246k
$65k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
+60%

Still filing today

75%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalHealthEnvironmentCivil RightsHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OREGON FOOD BANK
    6× · 2017–2025 · $42k · revenue +70%
  • IR
    ISAAC'S ROOM
    8× · 2018–2025 · $10k · revenue +132%
  • SALEM FOR REFUGEES
    8× · 2018–2025 · $10k · revenue +183%

Funded once

  • DIRECT RELIEFgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +94%
  • OE
    Oregon Environmental Council
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue -22%
  • GW
    GRACE WINS HAVEN
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Womenspace

Our mission is to protect, shelter, and empower survivors of domestic violence - offering safety, support, and resources with compassion and trauma-informed care.

Human Services
2
Saving Grace

Saving grace offers safety, hope, and healing to survivors of intimiate partner violence and sexual assault and engages central oregon to build life free from violence.

Human Services
3
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
4
Sheltercare

Sheltercare offers a variety of housing and support services for people who are homeless or those facing homelessness with a committed focus on the community's most vulnerable individuals dealing with psychiatric disabilities, acquired…

Housing & Shelter
5
Ywca of Greater Portland

To eliminate racism, empower women and promote peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all.

Human Services
6
Portland Street Medicine

We offer our homeless neighbors accessible whole-person care to improve and support health, and to bridge a gap in trust between people and systems.

Health
7
Haven Inc

To empower survivors to heal and engage all individuals and communities to address and prevent sexual assault and intimate partner violence

Crime & Legal
8
Impact Nw

Impact nw prevents homelessness by supporting people as they navigate their journey to stability and strength. founded in portland in 1966, impact nw now serves 26,944 people a year in the greater portland, oregon metro area, including…

Human Services
9
Interval House

The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…

Human Services
10
Survivors Inc

Survivor's ince. provides responsive, comprehensive, confidential and client driven and client focused services to those experiencing sexual abuse, domestic violence, human trafficking and stalking. the services provided include: a fully…

—
11
Path Home

To empower homeless families with children to get back into housing - and to stay there.

Housing & Shelter
12
Oregon Center for Public Policy

The oregon center for public policy's mission is to achieve economic justice for all oregonians through research, analysis, and advocacy. ocpp works to change policies that foster economic security and stability for all oregonians. we do…

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifeworks Nw; the most unlike its peers is Liv Pregnancy and Women's Wellness. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

55 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 55 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
54/55
Grantees still filing
43/55
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OREGON FOOD BANK: $41,959 · OtherOREGON FOOD BANKFRIENDS OF NEWPORT PARKS AND RECREATION INC: $21,782 · OtherFRIENDS OF NEWPORT PARKS AND RECREATION INCHAWAII FOOD BANK ( THE FOOD BASKET): $11,837 · OtherHAWAII FOOD BANK ( THE FOOD BASKET)LINCOLN COUNTY FOOD SHARE: $6,500 · OtherYMCA: $6,400 · OtherFriends of Newport Senior Activity Center: $6,200 · OtherAmerican Civil Liberties Union of Oregon Inc: $6,200 · Other+47 more: $81,088 · Other+47 moreDIRECT RELIEF: $14,600 · InternationalDIRECT RELIE…SALEM FOR REFUGEES: $10,000 · InternationalSALEM FOR RE…THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $6,633 · InternationalTHE UNION OF…MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL: $2,500 · InternationalMEDICAL TEAM…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRA…CHURCH AT THE PARK: $26,105 · ReligionCHURCH AT…+1 more: $250 · ReligionTHE FOOD BASKET INC: $16,005 · Food & NutritionMARION-POLK FOOD SHARE INC: $7,654 · Food & NutritionLOOKING GLASS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $4,895 · Human ServicesCLACKAMAS WOMEN'S SERVICES: $4,500 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF KONA INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesSTREET ROOTS INC: $2,944 · Human ServicesFamily Promise of Tualatin Valley: $2,500 · Human ServicesMY SISTERS' PLACE: $1,250 · Human ServicesMISSION STREET PARKS CONSERVANCY: $5,400 · EnvironmentOregon Environmental Council: $5,000 · EnvironmentTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $1,937 · EnvironmentDucks Unlimited Inc: $850 · EnvironmentISAAC'S ROOM: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentPROJECT HAWAII INC: $1,000 · Youth Development
Other$181,966International$35,733Religion$26,355Food & Nutrition$23,659Human Services$23,089Environment$13,187Youth Development$11,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOREGON FOOD BANK: $41,959 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHURCH AT THE PARK: $26,105 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOOD BASKET INC: $16,005 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetISAAC'S ROOM: $10,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetSALEM FOR REFUGEES: $10,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMARION-POLK FOOD SHARE INC: $7,654 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $6,633 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Civil Liberties Union of Oregon Inc: $6,200 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMISSION STREET PARKS CONSERVANCY: $5,400 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetEAST WASHINGTON COUNTY SHELTER PARTNERSHIP COUNCIL INC: $5,353 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetOregon Environmental Council: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLOOKING GLASS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $4,895 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCLACKAMAS WOMEN'S SERVICES: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF KONA INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCentral City Concern: $3,928 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADVOCATES FOR TRANS EQUALITY EDUCATION FUND: $3,706 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAIRVOTE: $3,105 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS HAWAII: $3,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetFAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTREET ROOTS INC: $2,944 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOUTRIGHT INTERNATIONAL: $2,927 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEWPORT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $2,853 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetFamily Promise of Tualatin Valley: $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $2,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON COAST COUNCIL FOR THE ARTS: $2,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPixie Project Inc: $1,950 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $1,937 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $1,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN HOUSE INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSISTERS OF THE ROAD INC: $1,461 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNAMI MULTNOMAH: $1,350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMY SISTERS' PLACE: $1,250 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL LAW ALLIANCE WORLDWIDE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HAWAII INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA AND DEPRESSION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc: $850 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Cancer Association: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON HUMANE SOCIETY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLiv Pregnancy and Women's Wellness: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLIFEWORKS NW: $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMORRISON CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $445 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDO GOOD MULTNOMAH: $445 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MOUNTAIN BICYCLING ASSOCIATION - COLORADO: $400 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL SNOW LEOPARD TRUST: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds CHURCH AT THE PARK ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD BASKET INC ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds ISAAC'S ROOM ↗
  • Who funds SALEM FOR REFUGEES ↗
  • Who funds MARION-POLK FOOD SHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon Inc ↗
  • Who funds MISSION STREET PARKS CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds EAST WASHINGTON COUNTY SHELTER PARTNERSHIP COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds Oregon Environmental Council ↗
  • Who funds LOOKING GLASS COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds CLACKAMAS WOMEN'S SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds GRACE WINS HAVEN ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF KONA INC ↗
  • Who funds Central City Concern ↗
  • Who funds ADVOCATES FOR TRANS EQUALITY EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds FAIRVOTE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS HAWAII ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS INC ↗
  • Who funds STREET ROOTS INC ↗
  • Who funds OUTRIGHT INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds NEWPORT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds Family Promise of Tualatin Valley ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community …OCF Joseph E Weston P…M J Murdock Charitabl…Meyer Memorial TrustThe Collins FoundationThe Autzen FoundationThe Ford Family Found…Braemar Charitable Tr…Marie Lamfrom Charita…Onpoint Community Cre…The Larson LegacyRose E Tucker Charita…
The Oregon Community FoundationOR42.7× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Meyer Memorial Trust · The Collins Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · Braemar Charitable Trust · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Onpoint Community Credit Union · The Larson Legacy · Rose E Tucker Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization O'Callaghan Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from O'Callaghan Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 120%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 18%
  • Morrison Child and Family Services: 91% of income from government
  • Family Building Blocks Inc: 68% of income from government
  • Oregon Council for the Humanities: 55% of income from government
  • Salem for Refugees: 35% of income from government
  • Clackamas Women's Services: 33% of income from government
  • My Sisters' Place: 25% of income from government
  • Oregon Food Bank: 21% of income from government
  • Looking Glass Community Services: 18% of income from government
  • Nami Multnomah: 16% of income from government
  • Medical Teams International: 14% of income from government
  • Church at the Park: 12% of income from government
  • Central City Concern: 10% of income from government
  • Lifeworks Nw: 8% of income from government
  • Isaac's Room: 5% of income from government
  • Marion-Polk Food Share Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Do Good Multnomah: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
12get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on O'Callaghan Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home