Oregon · Nonprofit
MISSION STREET PARKS CONSERVANCY
MISSION STREET PARKS CONSERVANCY (Oregon) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $26,631 to it, the largest being COMPTON FAMILY FOUNDATION REVOCABLE TRUST ($10,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
MISSION STREET PARKS CONSERVANCY runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 2,054 environment nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,054 environment nonprofits under $100k, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Willamette Workforce Partnershiplocal
- The Garden Club of Americaportfolio match
- Salem Community Foundation Incportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2019, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2019, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
91% of MISSION STREET PARKS CONSERVANCY’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (92% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.
Who funds it, year by year
2018 → 2023: the base held at 2 funders, grant income fell $9k → $536.
1 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 0% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of MISSION STREET PARKS CONSERVANCY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
MISSION STREET PARKS CONSERVANCY leans on a few funders — its largest provides 38% of grant income and the top three 87%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
29% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund MISSION STREET PARKS CONSERVANCY.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 88% · 2020 91% · 2021 100% · 2022 98% · 2023 93% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
100% of MISSION STREET PARKS CONSERVANCY's grant income comes from Oregon funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $56 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 5 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- Willamette Workforce PartnershiplocalOR · funds 250 organizations near you
- The Garden Club of Americaportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Salem Community Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Mission Hillfenway Neighborhood Trust Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Kinsman Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Echo Charitable Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- National Arbor Day Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- 1772 Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Garden Conservancy Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Central Park Conservancy Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- California State Parks Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- William M & Donna J Hoaglin Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like MISSION STREET PARKS CONSERVANCY
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Oregon
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Public support
80%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for MISSION STREET PARKS CONSERVANCY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds MISSION STREET PARKS CONSERVANCY?
- MISSION STREET PARKS CONSERVANCY (Oregon) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $26,631 to it, the largest being COMPTON FAMILY FOUNDATION REVOCABLE TRUST ($10,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does MISSION STREET PARKS CONSERVANCY have?
- IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $26,631 in grants to MISSION STREET PARKS CONSERVANCY, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of MISSION STREET PARKS CONSERVANCY?
- COMPTON FAMILY FOUNDATION REVOCABLE TRUST is the largest funder on record, with $10,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like MISSION STREET PARKS CONSERVANCY find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Oregon. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2019–2025), and the filings of 5funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing