Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nyce Family Foundation Trust Dtd 12/1/14

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$87k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$312kReligion$138kFood & Nutrition$52kHuman Services$40kEducation$15kHealth$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $57k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$979k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS$31,700
TZOHAR ISRAEL FOUNDATION$25,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO$5,000
AM ISRAEL FOUNDATION$5,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF EZRA$5,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NATAL$5,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TZALASH$5,000
THE AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE TECHNOLOGICAL JEWISH CENTER IN FRANCE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TZALASH: $5k → 13%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO: $5k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO: $25k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$215k · 7 repeat orgs$114k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
8

Total granted

$215k
$79k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+75%

Still filing today

57%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesReligionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $52k · revenue +169%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $40k · revenue +5%
  • AY
    AM YISRAEL FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $33k · revenue +155%

Funded once

  • CF
    Central Fund of Israelgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue +75%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS TECH JEWISH CTR FR
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • IE
    ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
2
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
3
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
4
American Friends of Even Yisroel Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
5
American Friends of Tzir Hemed
Philanthropy
6
American Friends of Israel Emergency Aid Fund

To provide funding for medical and humanitarian projects throughout israel. the organization might make grants to other organizations providing such services, including, but not limited to, evp israel and israel emergency aid fund, israeli…

Public Safety & Disaster
7
American Friends of Torat Eliyahu
Philanthropy
8
American Friends of Yeshivat Tiferet Zvi

The organization performs fundraising services for the benfit of yeshivat tiferest zvi and other learning institutions in jerusalem, israel

International
9
Sherit Isroel
—
10
American Friends of Ohel Bas Zion Inc
—
11
American Friends of Zvi Latzadik Dba Breslov Research Institute Jerusalem

To foster jewish religious education and disseminate the teachings of rabbi nachman of breslov through publication and distribution of books and cds, as well as seminars, lectures and study groups.

International
12
American Friends of Yeshivas Temimei Darech

To assist with providing Jewish education through support of Orthodox schools offering Torah studies.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Leket Israel Inc; the most unlike its peers is The American Friends of the Technological Jewish Center in Fra. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $258,025 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INCAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $51,500 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INCCHABAD OF THE SHORELINE: $50,000 · OtherCHABAD OF THE SHOREL…AMERICAN FRIENDS TECH JEWISH CTR FR: $20,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS TEC…THE AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE TECHNOLOGICAL JEWISH CENTER IN FRA: $15,000 · OtherTHE AMERICAN FRIENDS…Individual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant rec…Individual grant recipient: $5,000 · Other+3 more: $4,850 · OtherCentral Fund of Israel: $30,000 · InternationalCentral Fund …AMERICAN FRIENDS OF EZRA L MARPEH: $15,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIE…ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $10,000 · InternationalISRAEL EMERGE…AMIT CHILDREN INC: $9,000 · InternationalAMIT CHILDREN…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NATAL INC: $5,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIE…AM YISRAEL FOUNDATION INC: $33,200 · ReligionAM YISRAEL …TZOHAR ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $25,000 · ReligionTZOHAR ISRA…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TZALASH INC: $5,000 · Human Services
Philanthropy$309,525Other$104,850International$69,000Religion$58,200Human Services$45,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $258,025 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $51,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO INC: $40,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetAM YISRAEL FOUNDATION INC: $33,200 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTZOHAR ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF EZRA L MARPEH: $15,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMIT CHILDREN INC: $9,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TZALASH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NATAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY17.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nyce Family Foundation Trust Dtd 12/1/14 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nyce Family Foundation Trust Dtd 12/1/14. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nyce Family Foundation Trust Dtd 12/1/14’s filings →

    More from the funding graph