Skip to content
Now and Tomorrow at a glance

· Private foundation

Now and Tomorrow

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$83k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

International$349kEducation$13kFood & Nutrition$3kHuman Services$1kArts & Culture$700Animals$606Philanthropy$500Health$107Other$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $8k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$1,034
Median grant
3
States reached
$173k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NOW AND TOMORROW UGANDA$75,050
EARLHAM COLLEGE$6,000
LALMBA ASSOCIATION$1,034
RSVP OF DANE COUNTY$500
WAGS INC$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 7% of grant dollars ($27k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 93% that went abroad ($341k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 85% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION: $65 → 10%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $50 → 17%HEIFER INTERNATIONAL: $200 → 17%RAINFOREST TRUST: $53 → 14%FLORIDA URGENT RESCUE LLC: $106 → 14%RSVP OF DANE COUNTY: $500 → 10%BLANCHET HOUSE: $558 → 12%CARTER CENTER: $150 → 14%LALMBA ASSOCIATION: $2k → 12%EARLHAM COLLEGE: $6k → 18%LAKE ERIE COLLEGE: $2k → 9%SEATTLE ART MUSEUM: $250 → 9%ORGANIZATION FOR AUTISM RESEARCH: $107 → 7%INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE COMMITTEE: $1k → 17%HEIFER INTERNATIONAL: $200 → 17%OCEAN CONSERVATION: $50 → 14%WAGS INC: $500 → 10%LALMBA ASSOCIATION: $1k → 12%EARLHAM COLLEGE: $3k → 18%SEATTLE ART MUSEUM: $250 → 9%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $589 → 17%LALMBA ASSOCIATION: $1k → 12%EARLHAM COLLEGE: $2k → 18%SEATTLE ARTS AND LECTURES: $100 → 9%LALMBA ASSOCIATION: $1k → 12%FOOD LIFELINE: $850 → 9%LALMBA ASSOCIATION: $1k → 12%FOOD LIFELINE: $650 → 9%FOOD LIFELINE: $600 → 9%FOOD LIFELINE: $250 → 9%ACT COMMUNITY THEATER: $100 → 9%FUNDS FOR THE NEEDY: $500 → 9%FUNDS FOR THE NEEDY: $200 → 9%FUNDS FOR THE NEEDY: $150 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
WI
NY
OR
IN
OH
CA
CO
VA
AR
DC
GA
FL

Beyond the US: 93% of all-years giving ($341k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Uganda$341k · 6 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 31% of Now and Tomorrow’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Now and Tomorrowlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 95% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$362k · 8 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
13

Total granted

$362k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+39%

Still filing today

63%
77%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationArts & CultureFood & NutritionHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LA
    LALMBA ASSOCIATION
    5× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +14%
  • FL
    FOOD LIFELINE
    4× · 2020–2023 · $2k · revenue +6%
  • IJ
    INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $280 · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • LE
    LAKE ERIE COLLEGE
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +18%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $589 · revenue +63%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
2
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
3
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
4
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
5
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
6
Alight

Alight builds a meaningful life for and with the displaced. not simply addressing basic needs, but building a life filled with joy, dignity, connection, and purpose. we walk with them along their entire journey of displacement and deliver…

International
7
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
8
Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide

Educational & charitable. to provide legal and scientific information to public interest attorneys and scientists in numerous countries.

—
9
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
10
Relief International Inc

Relief international (ri) partners with communities impacted by conflict, climate change, and disaster to save lives, build greater resilience, and promote long-term health and wellbeing of people in the communities that we serve. relief…

International
11
International Life Sciences Institute

Ilsi is a global, nonprofit federation dedicated to generating and advancing emerging science and groundbreaking research to ensure foods are safe, nutritious and sustainable, and that they improve planetary and human health and well-being…

Science & Tech
12
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International Justice Mission; the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NOW AND TOMORROW UGANDA: $340,927 · OtherNOW AND TOMORROW UGANDA+8 more: $3,523 · OtherEarlham College Inc: $11,000 · EducationLAKE ERIE COLLEGE: $2,000 · EducationLALMBA ASSOCIATION: $6,034 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC: $589 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $280 · International+3 more: $253 · InternationalFOOD LIFELINE: $2,350 · Food & NutritionSEATTLE ART MUSEUM: $500 · Arts & CultureSEATTLE ARTS AND LECTURES: $100 · Arts & CultureRSVP OF DANE COUNTY INC: $500 · PhilanthropyORGANIZATION FOR AUTISM RESEARCH: $107 · HealthFlorida Urgent Rescue: $106 · Animals
Other$344,450Education$13,000International$7,156Food & Nutrition$2,350Arts & Culture$600Philanthropy$500Health$107Animals$106

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEarlham College Inc: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLALMBA ASSOCIATION: $6,034 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetFOOD LIFELINE: $2,350 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE ERIE COLLEGE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $589 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY: $558 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE ART MUSEUM: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $280 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORGANIZATION FOR AUTISM RESEARCH: $107 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFlorida Urgent Rescue: $106 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE ARTS AND LECTURES: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetElectronic Frontier Foundation Inc: $65 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAINFOREST TRUST: $53 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC9.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Now and Tomorrow funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Now and Tomorrow. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Now and Tomorrow’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home