Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Now and Tomorrow

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$83k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

International$349kEducation$13kFood & Nutrition$3kHuman Services$1kArts & Culture$700Animals$606Philanthropy$500Health$107Other$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $8k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$1,034
Median grant
3
States reached
$173k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NOW AND TOMORROW UGANDA$75,050
EARLHAM COLLEGE$6,000
LALMBA ASSOCIATION$1,034
RSVP OF DANE COUNTY$500
WAGS INC$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

Your US giving7% of grant dollars ($27k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 93% that went abroad ($341k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 85% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION: $65 → 10%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $50 → 17%HEIFER INTERNATIONAL: $200 → 17%RAINFOREST TRUST: $53 → 14%FLORIDA URGENT RESCUE LLC: $106 → 14%RSVP OF DANE COUNTY: $500 → 10%BLANCHET HOUSE: $558 → 12%CARTER CENTER: $150 → 14%LALMBA ASSOCIATION: $2k → 12%EARLHAM COLLEGE: $6k → 18%LAKE ERIE COLLEGE: $2k → 9%SEATTLE ART MUSEUM: $250 → 9%ORGANIZATION FOR AUTISM RESEARCH: $107 → 7%INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE COMMITTEE: $1k → 17%HEIFER INTERNATIONAL: $200 → 17%OCEAN CONSERVATION: $50 → 14%WAGS INC: $500 → 10%LALMBA ASSOCIATION: $1k → 12%EARLHAM COLLEGE: $3k → 18%SEATTLE ART MUSEUM: $250 → 9%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $589 → 17%LALMBA ASSOCIATION: $1k → 12%EARLHAM COLLEGE: $2k → 18%SEATTLE ARTS AND LECTURES: $100 → 9%LALMBA ASSOCIATION: $1k → 12%FOOD LIFELINE: $850 → 9%LALMBA ASSOCIATION: $1k → 12%FOOD LIFELINE: $650 → 9%FOOD LIFELINE: $600 → 9%FOOD LIFELINE: $250 → 9%ACT COMMUNITY THEATER: $100 → 9%FUNDS FOR THE NEEDY: $500 → 9%FUNDS FOR THE NEEDY: $200 → 9%FUNDS FOR THE NEEDY: $150 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
WI
NY
OR
IN
OH
CA
CO
VA
AR
DC
GA
FL

Beyond the US93% of all-years giving ($341k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Uganda$341k · 6 grants

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 31% of Now and Tomorrow’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Now and Tomorrowlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 95% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$362k · 8 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
13

Total granted

$362k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+39%

Still filing today

63%
77%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationArts & CultureFood & NutritionHealthPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LA
    LALMBA ASSOCIATION
    5× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +14%
  • FL
    FOOD LIFELINE
    4× · 2020–2023 · $2k · revenue +6%
  • IJ
    INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $280 · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • LE
    LAKE ERIE COLLEGE
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +18%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $589 · revenue +63%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
2
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
3
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
4
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
5
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
6
Alight

Alight builds a meaningful life for and with the displaced. not simply addressing basic needs, but building a life filled with joy, dignity, connection, and purpose. we walk with them along their entire journey of displacement and deliver…

International
7
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
8
Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide

Educational & charitable. to provide legal and scientific information to public interest attorneys and scientists in numerous countries.

9
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
10
Relief International Inc

Relief international (ri) partners with communities impacted by conflict, climate change, and disaster to save lives, build greater resilience, and promote long-term health and wellbeing of people in the communities that we serve. relief…

International
11
International Life Sciences Institute

Ilsi is a global, nonprofit federation dedicated to generating and advancing emerging science and groundbreaking research to ensure foods are safe, nutritious and sustainable, and that they improve planetary and human health and well-being…

Science & Tech
12
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International Justice Mission and the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NOW AND TOMORROW UGANDA — $340,927 · OtherNOW AND TOMORROW UGANDA+8 more — $3,523 · OtherEarlham College Inc — $11,000 · EducationLAKE ERIE COLLEGE — $2,000 · EducationLALMBA ASSOCIATION — $6,034 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC — $589 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION — $280 · International+3 more — $253 · InternationalFOOD LIFELINE — $2,350 · Food & NutritionSEATTLE ART MUSEUM — $500 · Arts & CultureSEATTLE ARTS AND LECTURES — $100 · Arts & CultureRSVP OF DANE COUNTY INC — $500 · PhilanthropyORGANIZATION FOR AUTISM RESEARCH — $107 · HealthFlorida Urgent Rescue — $106 · Animals
Other$344,450Education$13,000International$7,156Food & Nutrition$2,350Arts & Culture$600Philanthropy$500Health$107Animals$106

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEarlham College Inc — $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLALMBA ASSOCIATION — $6,034 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetFOOD LIFELINE — $2,350 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE ERIE COLLEGE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $589 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY — $558 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE ART MUSEUM — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION — $280 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORGANIZATION FOR AUTISM RESEARCH — $107 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFlorida Urgent Rescue — $106 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE ARTS AND LECTURES — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetElectronic Frontier Foundation Inc — $65 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAINFOREST TRUST — $53 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC9.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Now and Tomorrow funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph