Skip to content
Not Yet Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Not Yet Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$136k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$113k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$1.3MFood & Nutrition$742kHuman Services$514kHealth$452kEducation$185kYouth Development$182kEnvironment$25kCommunity Improvement$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $23k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $113k
$113,216
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PONHEARY LY FOUNDATION$113,216
WATER 1ST INTERNATIONAL$23,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $396k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOMAGE SENIOR SERVICES: $80k → 9%HOMAGE SENIOR SERVICES: $65k → 9%HOMAGE SENIOR SERVICES: $65k → 9%HOMAGE SENIOR SERVICES: $60k → 9%HOMAGE SENIOR SERVICES: $44k → 9%HOMAGE SENIOR SERVICES: $25k → 9%SENIOR SERVICES OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY: $50k → 9%YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE: $7k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
NY
CA
AZ
NM
HI
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.4M · 14 repeat orgs$201k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
6

Total granted

$3.4M
$201k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+22%

Still filing today

79%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionInternationalPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AT
    Alternatives to Hunger Bellingham Food Bank
    8× · 2017–2024 · $642k · revenue +99%
  • PL
    Ponheary Ly Foundation
    9× · 2017–2025 · $538k · revenue +9%
  • LITTLE BIT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER
    5× · 2017–2021 · $186k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • UF
    UNSTOPPABLE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $137k · revenue -44%
  • AW
    APPALACHIA WATER PROJECT - DIGDEEP
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • RC
    RAIN CITY ROCK CAMP FOR GIRLS
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northwest Harvest Emm

The organization's mission is growing food justice through collective action. the organization's vision is ending hunger in washington state.

—
2
Freedom Hooves Therapeutic Riding of Nw Colorado
—
3
Goodwill of the Olympics and Rainier Region

Goodwill of the Olympics and Rainier Region is committed to dismantling racism and advancing equity, diversity, and inclusion so that we can help people reach their fullest potential through education, job placement, and career pathway…

Employment
4
Nourish Pierce County

To provide food to individuals in need with compassion, dignity and respect. No one needing assistance is turned away.

—
5
Feeding Washington

Create a strong and effective statewide infrastructure that efficiently leverages resources to expand capacity in Washington State's Feeding America network.

Food & Nutrition
6
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
7
Port Angeles Food Bank

Nourishing our community. the port angeles food bank is the main food bank in clallam county, providing food to 13 other area pantries and meal programs as well as providing food to over 5,000 individuals per month.

Food & Nutrition
8
Lifelong Health for All

Lifelong health for all removes barriers to health with relentless compassion so that no one faces illness and injustice alone.

Health
9
Hopelink

Hopelink equips people to exit poverty through comprehensive services, impactful partnerships, and advocacy for equitable opportunities for all.

Human Services
10
Feeding Hawaii Together

To combat hunger on o'ahu by ensuring reliable access to nutritious, culturally appropriate food for all.

Human Services
11
Second Harvest Inland Northwest

Fighting hunger, feeding hope: second harvest brings community resources together to feed people in need through empowerment, education, and partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
12
Northwest Health Law Advocates

NoHLA works toward achieving a health care system in which all individuals receive quality, affordable health care, provided on an equitable and timely basis, and are assured of basic rights and protections. NoHLA conducts outreach,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Free Range Health; the most unlike its peers is Living the Dream Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Ponheary Ly Foundation: $538,104 · Human ServicesPonheary Ly FoundationSENIOR SERVICES OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY: $388,500 · Human ServicesSENIOR SERVICES OF SNOHOMISH …+1 more: $7,110 · Human ServicesWATER FIRST INTERNATIONAL: $778,036 · PhilanthropyWATER FIRST INTERNATIONA…Alternatives to Hunger Bellingham Food Bank: $641,616 · Food & NutritionAlternatives to Hunger …HAWAII FOODBANK INC: $100,000 · Food & NutritionHAWAII FOODBANK INCLOVING THUNDER THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC: $119,481 · HealthLOVING THU…Hoola Veteran Services: $118,500 · HealthHoola Vete…FREE RANGE HEALTH: $89,600 · HealthFREE RANGE…Living the Dream Foundation: $18,000 · HealthPENCILS OF PROMISE INCORPORATED: $185,000 · InternationalPENCILS OF…UNSTOPPABLE FOUNDATION: $136,708 · InternationalUNSTOPPABL…Individual grant recipient: $161,800 · OtherNORTHWEST THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $38,200 · OtherAPPALACHIA WATER PROJECT - DIGDEEP: $25,000 · OtherRAIN CITY ROCK CAMP FOR GIRLS: $20,000 · Other+3 more: $14,353 · OtherLITTLE BIT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $186,327 · Recreation & Sports
Human Services$933,714Philanthropy$778,036Food & Nutrition$741,616Health$345,581International$321,708Other$259,353Recreation & Sports$186,327

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWATER FIRST INTERNATIONAL: $778,036 over 9y, 9.5% of budgetAlternatives to Hunger Bellingham Food Bank: $641,616 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetPonheary Ly Foundation: $538,104 over 9y, 16% of budgetSENIOR SERVICES OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY: $388,500 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetLITTLE BIT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $186,327 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetPENCILS OF PROMISE INCORPORATED: $185,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetUNSTOPPABLE FOUNDATION: $136,708 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetLOVING THUNDER THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC: $119,481 over 3y, 34% of budgetHoola Veteran Services: $118,500 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetHAWAII FOODBANK INC: $100,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFREE RANGE HEALTH: $89,600 over 3y, 42% of budgetNORTHWEST THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $38,200 over 3y, 8.4% of budgetRAIN CITY ROCK CAMP FOR GIRLS: $20,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetLiving the Dream Foundation: $18,000 over 2y, 10.0% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871): $7,110 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSeattle Good Business Network DBA Good Business Network of Washington: $6,825 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Norcliffe Foundat…Puget Sound Energy Fo…Mightycause Charitabl…American Online Givin…Network for GoodDonor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Norcliffe FoundationWA13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Norcliffe Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Not Yet Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Not Yet Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Not Yet Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Not Yet Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Not Yet’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home