Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Not Yet Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$387k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

International$1.3MFood & Nutrition$742kHuman Services$514kHealth$452kEducation$185kYouth Development$182kEnvironment$25kCommunity Improvement$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $71k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $317k
$63,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$10k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BELLINGHAM FOOD BANK$150,000
PONHEARY LY FOUNDATION$103,226
HO'OLA VETERAN SERVICES$63,500
WATER 1ST INTERNATIONAL$34,500
Individual grant recipient$20,000
NORTHWEST THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER$16,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $396k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOMAGE SENIOR SERVICES: $80k → 9%HOMAGE SENIOR SERVICES: $65k → 9%HOMAGE SENIOR SERVICES: $65k → 9%HOMAGE SENIOR SERVICES: $60k → 9%HOMAGE SENIOR SERVICES: $44k → 9%HOMAGE SENIOR SERVICES: $25k → 9%SENIOR SERVICES OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY: $50k → 9%YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE: $7k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
NY
CA
AZ
NM
HI
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.2M · 14 repeat orgs$201k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
6

Total granted

$3.2M
$201k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+12%

Still filing today

79%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionInternationalPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AT
    Alternatives to Hunger Bellingham Food Bank
    8× · 2017–2024 · $642k · revenue +99%
  • PL
    Ponheary Ly Foundation
    8× · 2017–2024 · $425k · revenue +9%
  • LITTLE BIT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER
    5× · 2017–2021 · $186k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • UF
    UNSTOPPABLE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $137k · revenue -44%
  • AW
    APPALACHIA WATER PROJECT - DIGDEEP
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • RC
    RAIN CITY ROCK CAMP FOR GIRLS
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northwest Harvest Emm

The organization's mission is growing food justice through collective action. the organization's vision is ending hunger in washington state.

2
Snoqualmie Valley Food Bank

Our mission is to provide food and key resources to help our neighbors and community thrive. we lead the effort to feed, educated and advocate ending hunger in the snoqualmie valley and beyond.

Food & Nutrition
3
North Olympic Healthcare Network

To provide patient-centered, quality-driven, whole-person healthcare services, accessible to everyone in our community.

Health
4
Lifelong Health for All

Lifelong health for all removes barriers to health with relentless compassion so that no one faces illness and injustice alone.

Health
5
Port Angeles Food Bank

Nourishing our community. the port angeles food bank is the main food bank in clallam county, providing food to 13 other area pantries and meal programs as well as providing food to over 5,000 individuals per month.

Food & Nutrition
6
Feeding Washington

Create a strong and effective statewide infrastructure that efficiently leverages resources to expand capacity in Washington State's Feeding America network.

Food & Nutrition
7
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
8
Food Lifeline

Food lifeline's mission is to feed people experiencing hunger today while working to end hunger tomorrow.

Food & Nutrition
9
Washington Vocational Services

To provide job development, job seeking skills and job placement for persons with disabilities. we are dedicated to providing outstanding quality services that result in successful community involvement and employment for persons with…

Employment
10
King County Sexual Assault Resource Center

KCSARC is the largest and most comprehensive non-profit provider of sexual assault services in King County and Washington State. Our vision is a community free of sexual violence. Our mission is to: give voice to victims, their families,…

11
Bike Works Seattle

Bike Works promotes the bicycle as a vehicle for change to empower youth and build resilient communities.

Recreation & Sports
12
Disability Rights Washington

Disability rights washington's mission is to advance the dignity, equality, and self determination of people with disabilities. we work to pursue justice on matters related to human and legal rights.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Little Bit Therapeutic Riding Center and the most unlike its peers is Living the Dream Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Ponheary Ly Foundation — $424,888 · Human ServicesPonheary Ly FoundationSENIOR SERVICES OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY — $388,500 · Human ServicesSENIOR SERVICES OF SNOHOMIS…+1 more — $7,110 · Human ServicesWATER FIRST INTERNATIONAL — $755,036 · PhilanthropyWATER FIRST INTERNATIONA…Alternatives to Hunger Bellingham Food Bank — $641,616 · Food & NutritionAlternatives to Hunger B…HAWAII FOODBANK INC — $100,000 · Food & NutritionHAWAII FOODBANK INCLOVING THUNDER THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC — $119,481 · HealthLOVING THUN…Hoola Veteran Services — $118,500 · HealthHoola Veter…FREE RANGE HEALTH — $89,600 · HealthFREE RANGE …Living the Dream Foundation — $18,000 · HealthPENCILS OF PROMISE INCORPORATED — $185,000 · InternationalPENCILS OF…UNSTOPPABLE FOUNDATION — $136,708 · InternationalUNSTOPPABL…Individual grant recipient — $161,800 · OtherNORTHWEST THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER — $38,200 · OtherAPPALACHIA WATER PROJECT - DIGDEEP — $25,000 · OtherRAIN CITY ROCK CAMP FOR GIRLS — $20,000 · Other+3 more — $14,353 · OtherLITTLE BIT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER — $186,327 · Recreation & Sports
Human Services$820,498Philanthropy$755,036Food & Nutrition$741,616Health$345,581International$321,708Other$259,353Recreation & Sports$186,327

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWATER FIRST INTERNATIONAL — $755,036 over 8y, 9.5% of budgetAlternatives to Hunger Bellingham Food Bank — $641,616 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetPonheary Ly Foundation — $424,888 over 8y, 14% of budgetSENIOR SERVICES OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY — $388,500 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetLITTLE BIT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER — $186,327 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetPENCILS OF PROMISE INCORPORATED — $185,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetUNSTOPPABLE FOUNDATION — $136,708 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetLOVING THUNDER THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC — $119,481 over 3y, 34% of budgetHoola Veteran Services — $118,500 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetHAWAII FOODBANK INC — $100,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFREE RANGE HEALTH — $89,600 over 3y, 42% of budgetNORTHWEST THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER — $38,200 over 3y, 8.4% of budgetRAIN CITY ROCK CAMP FOR GIRLS — $20,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetLiving the Dream Foundation — $18,000 over 2y, 10.0% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871) — $7,110 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSeattle Good Business Network DBA Good Business Network of Washington — $6,825 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Norcliffe FoundationWA13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Norcliffe Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Not Yet Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Not Yet Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Not Yet Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph