Skip to content

· Public charity

Norton Sound Economic Development Corporation

To develop and sustain new and ongoing economic activity in the Norton Sound region.

$8.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
46
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$670k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Public Benefit$35MArts & Culture$7.3MEnvironment$6.3MEducation$3.6MHealth$3.5MHousing & Shelter$1.6MHuman Services$910kEmployment$884kOther$0
02FY2024 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 46 grants below total $6,316,819, the rows itemized in this filing. The $8,685,378 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,368,559 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $78k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $223k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.9M
  • $250k+11 grants · $4.2M
$67,455
Median grant
2
States reached
$401M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Native Village of Savoonga$669,585
City of Teller$513,066
City of Stebbins$454,500
City of Golovin$356,480
City of Elim$353,718
City of St Michael$346,812
Native Village of Koyuk$317,265
Native Village of Gambell$311,632
Bering Strait School District$307,751
City of Unalakleet$264,926
Nome Joint Utilities$256,140
City of Gambell$231,699
City of White Mountain$209,621
City of Shaktoolik$184,912
City of Wales$173,974
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $168k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Rachels Challenge: $13k → 8%American Red Cross: $8k → 10%Bering Sea Womens Group: $28k → 20%Bering Sea Womens Group: $20k → 20%Bering Sea Womens Group: $20k → 20%Bering Sea Womens Group: $20k → 20%Bering Sea Womens Group: $20k → 20%Bering Sea Womens Group: $20k → 20%Bering Sea Womens Group: $20k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$60M · 52 repeat orgs$827k to everyone else

52 repeat relationships: 43 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

52
18

Total granted

$60M
$804k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+17%

Still filing today

17%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationHousing & ShelterReligionCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NS
    NORTON SOUND HEALTH CORPORATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $3.5M · revenue +95%
  • KI
    KAWERAK INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $638k · revenue +220%
  • AL
    Alaska Legal Services Corporation
    2× · 2017–2018 · $23k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • KI
    KING ISLAND NATIVE COMMUNITY
    one grant, 2021 · $210k
  • NC
    Nome Community United Methodi
    one grant, 2021 · $147k
  • GP
    Gambell Presbyterian Church
    one grant, 2018 · $99k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alaska Rural Electric Cooperative Association Educational Foundation Inc
Environment
2
No on 2

Oppose 2024 Alaska Ballot Measure 2, which would have repealed nonpartisan open primaries and ranked choice voting.

—
3
United Way of Anchorage

We unite caring people to give volunteer and take action to remove barriers to opportunities. Thats been our mission since we first started serving Alaska. It guides how we solve our communitys toughest challenges and is why weve been able…

Philanthropy
4
Alaska Native Health Board

The mission of the alaska native health board is to promote the spiritual, physical, mental, social, and cultural well-being and pride of alaska native people.

—
5
Alaska Public Interest Research Group

Consumer Advocacy

Public Benefit
6
Nome Chamber of Commerce Inc

The Nome Chamber strives to encourage free enterprise and trade, promote unification of the businesss community, provide a business forum for membership, attract new industry and commerce, maintain and improve business conditions and…

—
7
Alaska Coalition on Housing and Homelessness

To increase affordable housing and end homelessness in Alaska.

Housing & Shelter
8
Chugach Regional Resources Commission

The Chugach Regional Resources Commission (the Commission) was established for the purpose of providing formal advocacy to manage natural resources in ways consistent with the cultural traditions of the Chugach Native people.

—
9
Alaska Association of Nurse Anesthesiology

To promote professional interest of membership

Community Improvement
10
Food Bank of Alaska

FBA believes no one deserves to be hungry. We are dedicated to eliminating hunger in Alaska by obtaining and providing food to partner agencies and through anti-hunger leadership.

Food & Nutrition
11
Alaska Womens Resource Center

Aknwrc is dedicated to strengthening local, tribal government's responses through community organizing efforts advocating for the safety of women and children in their communities and homes, especially against domestic and sexual abuse and…

Human Services
12
Stand Up Alaska

To Harness the power of the diverse people of Alaska and their communities to empower and support transformative social change. Stand Up Alaska is an Alaskan-led movement providing intersectional and diverse views on issues affecting all…

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nome Community Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tundra Health Initiative Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/17
Grantees still filing
9/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BERING STRAIT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $4,922,950 · OtherBERING STRAIT SCHOOL DISTRICTCity of Nome: $4,703,866 · OtherCity of NomeNative Village of Diomede: $4,484,991 · OtherNative Village of DiomedeCity of Stebbins: $3,568,135 · OtherCity of StebbinsCity of St Michael: $3,515,282 · OtherCity of St MichaelCity of Teller: $3,297,211 · OtherCity of TellerCity of Unalakleet: $3,111,951 · OtherCity of UnalakleetCity of Gambell: $2,824,745 · OtherCity of Shaktoolik: $2,591,058 · OtherCity of Savoonga: $2,507,166 · OtherCity of Elim: $2,502,542 · OtherCity of White Mountain: $2,087,162 · OtherCity of Koyuk: $1,995,721 · Other+49 more: $14,911,282 · Other+49 moreNORTON SOUND HEALTH CORPORATION: $3,456,414 · Health+1 more: $12,486 · HealthNome Emergency Shelter Team: $240,000 · Housing & ShelterBering Sea Womans Group: $147,500 · Human ServicesRACHEL'S CHALLENGE: $12,520 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $7,500 · Human ServicesKNOM Radio Mission Inc: $65,000 · ReligionBoys & Girls Clubs of Southcentral Alaska: $63,399 · Youth DevelopmentUNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FOUNDATION: $12,882 · EducationNome Preschool Association Inc: $12,794 · Education
Other$57,024,062Health$3,468,900Housing & Shelter$240,000Human Services$167,520Religion$65,000Youth Development$63,399Education$25,676

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTON SOUND HEALTH CORPORATION: $3,456,414 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetKAWERAK INC: $638,267 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetNome Emergency Shelter Team: $240,000 over 8y, 9.3% of budgetBERING SEA POST 9569 VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES: $206,383 over 8y, 20% of budgetNOME COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $183,412 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetBering Sea Womans Group: $147,500 over 7y, 4.4% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Southcentral Alaska: $63,399 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetAlaska Legal Services Corporation: $23,249 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNUDLAGHI LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $17,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSEASHARE: $17,312 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FOUNDATION: $12,882 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNome Preschool Association Inc: $12,794 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetRACHEL'S CHALLENGE: $12,520 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTUNDRA HEALTH INITIATIVE CORP: $12,486 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTON SOUND HEALTH CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds KAWERAK INC ↗
  • Who funds Nome Emergency Shelter Team ↗
  • Who funds BERING SEA POST 9569 VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES ↗
  • Who funds NOME COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Bering Sea Womans Group ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kawerak IncAK49.5× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kawerak Inc · The Alaska Community Foundation · Norton Sound Health Corporation · Rasmuson Foundation · Alaska Children's Trust · Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Valley Hospital Association Inc Dba Mat-Su Health Foundation · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Norton Sound Economic Development Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Norton Sound Economic Development Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 72 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Norton Sound Economic Development’s filings →

    More from the funding graph