· Public charity
Norton Sound Health Corporation
To provide quality health services and promote wellness within our people and environment.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 14 grants below total $258,632 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $885,578 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $626,946 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VILLAGE OF SOLOMON | $32,500 |
| NATIVE VILLAGE OF SHAKTOOLIK | $25,000 |
| NATIVE VILLAGE OF BREVIG MISSION | $25,000 |
| NATIVE VILLAGE OF ST MICHAEL | $24,966 |
| NATIVE VILLAGE OF KOYUK | $24,916 |
| NATIVE VILLAGE OF COUNCIL | $15,250 |
| NATIVE VILLAGE OF WHITE MOUNTAIN | $15,250 |
| NATIVE VILLAGE OF WALES | $15,250 |
| NATIVE VILLAGE OF SHISHMAREF | $15,250 |
| NATIVE VILLAGE OF UNALAKLEET | $15,250 |
| NOME ESKIMO COMMUNITY | $15,000 |
| CHINIK ESKIMO COMMUNITY | $15,000 |
| ILISAQATIVUT | $10,000 |
| NATIVE VILLAGE OF STEBBINS | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 18%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
25 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NVNative Village of Unalakleet7× · 2018–2024 · $1.1M
- NCNOME COMMUNITY CENTER INC4× · 2020–2023 · $412k · revenue -11%
- NENome Emergency Shelter Team4× · 2017–2022 · $325k · 28% of their budget
Funded once
- RIRUN IT WILD LLCone grant, 2021 · $50k
- COCity of Teller3× · 2018–2023 · $40k
- COCity of Golovinone grant, 2018 · $30k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Norton Sound Economic Development Corporation · Kawerak Inc · Rasmuson Foundation · The Alaska Community Foundation · Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Norton Sound Health Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.