Skip to content

· Private foundation

Norton M Luger and Rosalind Massow Luger Charitable Trust I

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$426k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$115k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$401kPublic Benefit$150kHuman Services$64kEducation$45kSocial Science$39kCrime & Legal$11kReligion$11kHousing & Shelter$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $282k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $115k
$6,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WASHINGTON STUDIO SCHOOL$115,000
THE INTERCEPT MEDIA$35,000
EAST BAY PERFORMING ARTS$35,000
LIVE ARTS NEW YORK$35,000
Individual grant recipient$35,000
HANNAH ARENDT CENTER CO THE BARD COLLEGE$35,000
TWO RIVERS PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL$35,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
ROSENBERG FUND FOR CHILDREN$15,000
ESTHER PRODUCTIONS INC$12,000
ROUND HOUSE THEATRE INC$10,000
NOPE ORGANIZE FOR DEMOCRACY FUND$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
JEWS UNITED FOR JUSTICE INC JUFJ$6,000
GLEN ECHO PARK PARTNERSHIP$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ROSENBERG FUND FOR CHILDREN: $13k → 12%ESTHER PRODUCTIONS INC: $12k → 14%ESTHER PRODUCTIONS INC: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
CA
VA
MD
DC
MS
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$378k · 8 repeat orgs$360k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
21

Total granted

$378k
$192k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+2%

Still filing today

63%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $168k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WS
    Washington Studio School
    2× · 2024–2025 · $130k · revenue 0%
  • EB
    EAST BAY PERFORMING ARTS dba OAKLAND SYMPHONY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $73k · revenue -8%
  • TI
    THE INTERCEPT MEDIA
    2× · 2024–2025 · $70k

Funded once

  • LA
    LIVE ARTS NEW YORK LIVE CORE
    one grant, 2024 · $40k
  • BC
    BARD COLLEGEHANNAH ARENDT CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $35k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $35k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Washington Performing Arts Society

Washington performing arts champions the arts as a unifying force. through collaborations with artists, educators, community leaders, and institutional partners, we bring wide-ranging artistic programs to stages, schools, and neighborhoods…

Arts & Culture
2
District of Columbia Arts Center

The District of Columbia Arts Center serves the Washington DC area by presenting high caliber and challenging works. It encourages professionalism among artists by providing a forum for educational and cultural exchange. DCAC was founded…

Arts & Culture
3
Young Playwrights Theater

Young Playwrights Theater (YPT) is committed to using theater & writing to foster dialogue, arts education, literacy & conflict resolution in communities.

Arts & Culture
4
Imagination Stage of Washington Dc Inc

Imagination stage of washington, dc, inc. empowers all young people to discover their voice and identity through performing arts education and professional theatre.

Arts & Culture
5
Dc Independent Film Festival

The DC Independent Film Festival (DCIFF) showcases and supports local and international filmmakers and their work across the genres of fiction, animation, experimental and documentary through screening, discussion, professional…

Arts & Culture
6
The Thirteen

The Thirteen is a professional choir and orchestra with a mission to inspire the soul to sing, move the heart to empathy, and build community, all through groundbreaking musical performance: through concerts, workshops, education outreach,…

Unclassified
7
Cityworks Dc

Our mission is to dramatically improve the early career outcomes of dc youth and young adults of color by creating innovative programs and by mobilizing employers, educators, and city leaders to create a local, diverse talent pipeline. our…

Education
8
The Theatre Lab Inc

The theatre lab provides classes and workshops to adults and youth in the areas of acting for the stage and screen, directing, playwriting, musical theatre, and drama criticism. the organization also conducts extensive outreach…

Arts & Culture
9
National Philharmonic Orchestra and Chorale of Montgomery County Inc

The National Philharmonic engages, inspires, and unites diverse communities across the Washington, DC area through outstanding music performances and innovative education programs.

Arts & Culture
10
Capital Fringe Inc

Capital Fringe was founded in 2005 with a mission to celebrate cultural democracy and access to art and artistic expression for all. By embracing diversity and a spirit of independence, we create earning opportunities for individual…

Arts & Culture
11
Washington Project for the Arts Inc

Washington project for the arts, inc. (wpa) supports artist-driven projects, advocacy, and dialogue so that artists can live, work, and flourish.

Arts & Culture
12
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Dc Central Kitchen Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Spoken Word the Spoken Word. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
7/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Washington Studio School: $130,000 · OtherWashington Studio SchoolTHE INTERCEPT MEDIA: $70,000 · OtherTHE INTERCEPT MEDIALIVE ARTS NEW YORK LIVE CORE: $40,000 · OtherLIVE ARTS NEW YORK LIVE COREBARD COLLEGEHANNAH ARENDT CENTER: $35,000 · OtherBARD COLLEGEHANNAH ARENDT CENTERHANNAH ARENDT CENTER CO THE BARD COLLEGE: $35,000 · OtherHANNAH ARENDT CENTER CO THE BARD COLLEGEIndividual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientACTBLUE CIVICS INC (NOPE): $35,000 · OtherACTBLUE CIVICS INC (NOPE)Individual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLIVE ARTS NEW YORK: $35,000 · OtherLIVE ARTS NEW YORKIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · Other+23 more: $86,524 · Other+23 moreEAST BAY PERFORMING ARTS dba OAKLAND SYMPHONY: $72,500 · Arts & CultureEAST BAY PERFO…ROUND HOUSE THEATRE INC: $12,000 · Arts & CultureROUND HOUSE TH…+3 more: $6,700 · Arts & Culture+3 moreTWO RIVERS PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $40,000 · EducationCOLLABORISING INC: $2,500 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationESTHER PRODUCTIONS INC: $17,000 · Human ServicesROSENBERG FUND FOR CHILDREN INC: $12,500 · Human ServicesFriendship Place: $5,500 · Housing & ShelterMID-ATLANTIC INNOCENCE PROJECT: $5,000 · Crime & LegalUrban Tilth: $1,125 · EnvironmentALLPEOPLEBEHAPPY (F/K/A AMIZADE LTD): $525 · Philanthropy
Other$561,524Arts & Culture$91,200Education$43,500Human Services$29,500Housing & Shelter$5,500Crime & Legal$5,000Environment$1,125Philanthropy$525

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWashington Studio School: $130,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetEAST BAY PERFORMING ARTS dba OAKLAND SYMPHONY: $72,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTWO RIVERS PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetESTHER PRODUCTIONS INC: $17,000 over 2y, 9.4% of budgetROSENBERG FUND FOR CHILDREN INC: $12,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetROUND HOUSE THEATRE INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFriendship Place: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMID-ATLANTIC INNOCENCE PROJECT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WASHINGTON CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOLLABORISING INC: $2,500 over 1y, 15% of budgetUrban Tilth: $1,125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLACK STUDENT FUND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $525 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLPEOPLEBEHAPPY (F/K/A AMIZADE LTD): $525 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK ROAD RUNNERS INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Washington Studio School ↗
  • Who funds EAST BAY PERFORMING ARTS dba OAKLAND SYMPHONY ↗
  • Who funds TWO RIVERS PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds ESTHER PRODUCTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds ROSENBERG FUND FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds ROUND HOUSE THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds Friendship Place ↗
  • Who funds MID-ATLANTIC INNOCENCE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WASHINGTON CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds COLLABORISING INC ↗
  • Who funds The SPOKEN WORD The Spoken Word ↗
  • Who funds Urban Tilth ↗
  • Who funds BLACK STUDENT FUND ↗
  • Who funds GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLPEOPLEBEHAPPY (F/K/A AMIZADE LTD) ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Washington Community FoundationDC12.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Norton M Luger and Rosalind Massow Luger Charitable Trust I funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Norton M Luger and Rosalind Massow Luger Charitable Trust I. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Round House Theatre Inc: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Norton M Luger and Rosalind Massow Luger Charitable Trust I?

Find your warmest path to Norton M Luger and Rosalind Massow Luger Charitable Trust I through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Norton M Luger and Rosalind Massow Luger Charitable Trust I’s filings →

More from the funding graph