· Public charity
Northern California Grantmakers
regions most pressing social issues.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $17k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $380k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Catalyst of San Diego | $190,000 |
| Southern Calif Grantmakers | $190,000 |
| Sogorea Te Land Trust | $5,500 |
| Wiyot Tribe | $5,500 |
| Assn of Ramaytush Ohlone | $5,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $360k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 56% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CVCOMMUNITY VISION CAPITAL & CONSULTING3× · 2019–2021 · $530k · revenue +98%
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS4× · 2019–2024 · $335k · revenue +418%
Catalyst of San Diego & Imperial Counties3× · 2019–2024 · $299k · revenue +10%
Funded once
- ILIDEO LPone grant, 2020 · $50k
- TBThe Black Organizing Project Incone grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue -24%
- YAYOUTH ALLIANCEgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue +128%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…
Serve as a partner, educator, and guide for philanthropy in reimagining practices that advance a thriving and just world.
Unitedly is a nonprofit organization based in San Mateo County, California. Unitedly was established to ensure Asian families and communities have access to equitable opportunities and resources to thrive in the San Francisco Bay Area.
California Donor Table anchors a hub of donors, foundations, and community leaders. We pool together our resources to shape California into a truly democratic state that works for the people, not the powerful. Rooted in our commitment to…
CAUSE's mission is to build grassroots power to realize social, economic and environmental justice for the people of the Central Coast Region through policy research, leadership development, organizing and advocacy.
Asian Immigrant Women Advocates empowers low-income, limited English speaking immigrant women and youth through education, leadership development and civic participation programs.
To educate california youth about the operations of local, state, and federal government.
Our mission is to fight against fossil fuel executives and industries that have turned our communities into dumping grounds for toxic waste, poisoning our air, water, lan, and bodies. We organize to oppose giant oil refineries, dirty…
Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…
Our mission is to activate the leadership of families, educators, and community allies to advocate on behalf of California children and youth to ensure that all students have access to excellent public schools in their neighborhoods and…
regions most pressing social issues. We pool resources, share information, work together, and learn from each other. NCG recognizes that the challenges facing our communities are complex, entrenched and interconnected.
The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Women's Freedom Center and the most unlike its peers is Trees Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY VISION CAPITAL & CONSULTING ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS ↗
- Who funds Catalyst of San Diego & Imperial Counties ↗
- Who funds CHINESE PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
- Who funds RESTORATIVE JUSTICE FOR OAKLAND YOUTH RJOY ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC ↗
- Who funds MOVEMENT STRATEGY CENTER ↗
- Who funds RYSE INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES FOR A BETTER ENVIRONMENT ↗
- Who funds SERVICES IMMIGRANT RIGHTS AND EDUCATION NETWORK (SIREN) ↗
- Who funds FILIPINO ADVOCATES FOR JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds Youth Together Inc ↗
- Who funds Genders & Sexualities Alliance Network DBA GSA Network ↗
- Who funds JAKARA MOVEMENT ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER ↗
- Who funds Oakland Kids First ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES UNITED FOR RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTICE DBA CURYJ ↗
- Who funds Asian Pacific Environmental Network ↗
- Who funds Coleman Children and Youth Services dba Coleman Advocates for Children & Youth ↗
- Who funds Homies Organizing The Mission To Empower Youth HOMEY ↗
- Who funds Youth United for Community Action ↗
- Who funds MALDEF - MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
- Who funds Californians For Justice Education Fund ↗
- Who funds Trees Foundation ↗
- Who funds The Black Organizing Project Inc ↗
- Who funds YOUTH ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds Causa Justa Just Cause ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDIAN DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY WORKS WEST INC ↗
- Who funds Chinese for Affirmative Action ↗
- Who funds GRANTMAKERS CONCERNED WITH IMMIGRANTS AND REFUGEES ↗
- Who funds SOGOREA TE LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds FUNDERS TOGETHER TO END HOMELESSNES ↗
- Who funds Association of Ramaytush Ohlone ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The California Endowment · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · East Bay Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Movement Strategy Center · The James Irvine Foundation · Tides Foundation · Stupski Foundation · The Sobrato Family Foundation · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Northern California Grantmakers funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.