Skip to content
Northeast Michigan Community Service Agency Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Northeast Michigan Community Service Agency Inc

Enhancing quality of life by empowering individuals and strengthening communities.

$24M
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$2.7M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$16MHuman Services$15MFood & Nutrition$7.8MCrime & Legal$220kHealth$115k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 14 grants below total $5,624,373, the rows itemized in this filing. The $23,554,821 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $17,930,448 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $26k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+6 grants · $4.4M
$245,366
Median grant
1
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MID MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC$2,670,165
OTSEGO COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING$363,398
OGEMAW COMMISSION ON AGING$340,348
IOSCO COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING INC$338,385
ROSCOMMON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING$335,885
ALPENA AREA SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL INC$316,847
CHEBOYGAN COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING$245,366
SUNRISE SIDE SENIOR SERVICES$205,535
CRAWFORD COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING$184,918
ALCONA COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING$180,352
PRESQUE ISLE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING$143,358
OSCODA COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING$139,528
MONTMORENCY COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING$133,802
LEGAL SERVICES OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN INC$26,486
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $18.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CHEBOYGAN COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $266k → 12%SUNRISE SIDE SENIOR SERVICES: $231k → 14%ALPENA AREA SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL INC: $322k → 16%ROSCOMMON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING: $412k → 16%OGEMAW COMMISSION ON AGING: $340k → 16%IOSCO COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING INC: $338k → 18%CHEBOYGAN COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $245k → 12%SUNRISE SIDE SENIOR SERVICES: $229k → 14%ALPENA AREA SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL INC: $317k → 16%ROSCOMMON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING: $405k → 16%OGEMAW COMMISSION ON AGING: $336k → 16%IOSCO COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING INC: $304k → 18%CHEBOYGAN COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $242k → 12%SUNRISE SIDE SENIOR SERVICES: $218k → 14%ALPENA AREA SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL INC: $316k → 16%ROSCOMMON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING: $400k → 16%OGEMAW COMMISSION ON AGING: $319k → 16%IOSCO COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING INC: $296k → 18%CHEBOYGAN COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $241k → 12%SUNRISE SIDE SENIOR SERVICES: $218k → 14%ALPENA AREA SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL INC: $312k → 16%ROSCOMMON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING: $397k → 16%OGEMAW COMMISSION ON AGING: $315k → 16%IOSCO COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING INC: $293k → 18%CHEBOYGAN COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $240k → 12%SUNRISE SIDE SENIOR SERVICES: $218k → 14%ALPENA AREA SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL INC: $311k → 16%ROSCOMMON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING: $395k → 16%OGEMAW COMMISSION ON AGING: $312k → 16%IOSCO COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING INC: $289k → 18%Cheboygan County Council on Aging: $236k → 12%ALPENA AREA SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL INC: $305k → 16%ROSCOMMON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING: $393k → 16%OGEMAW COMMISSION ON AGING: $304k → 16%IOSCO COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING INC: $284k → 18%CHEBOYGAN COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $226k → 12%ALPENA AREA SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL INC: $299k → 16%ROSCOMMON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING: $388k → 16%OGEMAW COMMISSION ON AGING: $303k → 16%IOSCO COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING INC: $279k → 18%ALPENA AREA SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL INC: $298k → 16%Roscommon County Commission on Aging: $372k → 16%OGEMAW COMMISSION ON AGING: $292k → 16%IOSCO COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING INC: $265k → 18%Alpena Area Senior Citizens Council Inc: $295k → 16%ROSCOMMON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING: $336k → 16%Ogemaw Commission on Aging: $278k → 16%Iosco County Commission on Aging Inc: $261k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$45M · 15 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
1

Total granted

$45M
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+32%

Still filing today

87%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCrime & LegalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    MID MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $19M · revenue +141%
  • RC
    ROSCOMMON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.5M · revenue +41%
  • OC
    OGEMAW COMMISSION ON AGING
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.8M · revenue +31% · 29% of their budget

Funded once

  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +32%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Marinette County Committee on Aging Inc

Our mission at Marinette County Elderly Services is to assist older persons in maintaining a longer, healthier, and more fulfilled life.

Human Services
2
Kosciusko County Council On Aging and Aged Inc

To provide services and resources to the aged citizens of kosciusko county indiana and surrounding areas including transportation, mobile meals, and senior activities to improve quality of life

—
3
Dillon County Council On Aging

Provides senior center and congregate and home delivered meals, homemaker services allowing seniors to remain in their homes.

Human Services
4
Stark County Council On Aging

Provide elderly services to allow persons to stay in their own homes

Human Services
5
Minot Commission On Aging Inc

The Agencys mission is to provide meals and health services to senior citizens in a seven county area.

Food & Nutrition
6
Area Agency On Aging of Western Michigan Inc

Through internal expertise, external partnerships, and advocacy, the area agency on aging of western michigan provides older adults, adults with disabilities, and their caregivers equitable access to services that promote independence and…

Human Services
7
Lancaster County Council On Aging

The mission of the lancaster county council on aging is to provide a system of coordinated and comprehensive services to enable older persons of lancaster county to continue to maintain their independence.

Human Services
8
Tuscarawas County Committee On Aging

To provide opportunities to individualsover 50 years of age in tuscarawas county, ohiothrough healthy living, independence, physical andmental health, education, and recreational programs

Human Services
9
Oceana County Council On Aging

To provide services to seniors in oceana county, including providing meals, transporation, social and health programming, senior trips, and homemaking services.

Human Services
10
Posey County Council On Aging Inc

Services for senior citizens of posey county, indiana

Human Services
11
Wexford County Council On Aging

To provide resources and support for wexford county residents, sixty and older.

Human Services
12
Greenbrier County Committee On Aging Inc

The organization operates a senior citizen's center in greenbrier county west virgnia. senior citizens are provided with transportation, nutrition, in-home care and other personal and social services.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Otsego County Commission On Aging; the most unlike its peers is Legal Services of Northern Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
14/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MID MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $18,864,651 · OtherMID MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INCOTSEGO COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING: $2,543,343 · OtherOTSEGO COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGINGCRAWFORD COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING: $1,674,072 · OtherCRAWFORD COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGINGPRESQUE ISLE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $1,475,233 · OtherPRESQUE ISLE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGINGOSCODA COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $1,235,886 · Other+1 more: $111,763 · OtherROSCOMMON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING: $3,498,525 · Human ServicesROSCOMMON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGINGOGEMAW COMMISSION ON AGING: $2,799,934 · Human ServicesOGEMAW COMMISSION ON AGINGALPENA AREA SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL INC: $2,776,299 · Human ServicesALPENA AREA SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL INCIOSCO CO COMMISSION ON AGING INC: $2,609,228 · Human ServicesIOSCO CO COMMISSION ON AGING INCCHEBOYGAN COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $2,108,473 · Human ServicesCHEBOYGAN COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGINGSUNRISE SIDE SENIOR SERVICES: $1,934,940 · Human ServicesSUNRISE SIDE SENIOR SERVICESALCONA COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING: $1,529,751 · Human ServicesALCONA COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGINGMONTMORENCY COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING: $1,443,123 · Human ServicesMONTMORENCY COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGINGLegal Services of Northern Michigan: $246,223 · Crime & LegalALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $3,455 · Health
Other$25,904,948Human Services$18,700,273Crime & Legal$246,223Health$3,455

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMID MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $18,864,651 over 9y, 17% of budgetROSCOMMON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING: $3,498,525 over 9y, 21% of budgetOGEMAW COMMISSION ON AGING: $2,799,934 over 9y, 29% of budgetALPENA AREA SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL INC: $2,776,299 over 9y, 27% of budgetIOSCO CO COMMISSION ON AGING INC: $2,609,228 over 9y, 31% of budgetOTSEGO COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING: $2,543,343 over 9y, 15% of budgetCHEBOYGAN COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $2,108,473 over 9y, 22% of budgetSUNRISE SIDE SENIOR SERVICES: $1,934,940 over 9y, 30% of budgetALCONA COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING: $1,529,751 over 9y, 26% of budgetPRESQUE ISLE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $1,475,233 over 9y, 18% of budgetMONTMORENCY COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING: $1,443,123 over 9y, 19% of budgetOSCODA COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $1,235,886 over 9y, 32% of budgetLegal Services of Northern Michigan: $246,223 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $3,455 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MID MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds ROSCOMMON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds OGEMAW COMMISSION ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds ALPENA AREA SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds IOSCO CO COMMISSION ON AGING INC ↗
  • Who funds OTSEGO COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds CHEBOYGAN COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds SUNRISE SIDE SENIOR SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds ALCONA COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds PRESQUE ISLE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds MONTMORENCY COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds OSCODA COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds Legal Services of Northern Michigan ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Consumers Energy Foun…Michigan Health Endow…Amazonsmile Foundation
Consumers Energy FoundationMI21.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Consumers Energy Foundation · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Northeast Michigan Community Service Agency Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Northeast Michigan Community Service Agency Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Northeast Michigan Community Service Agency’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home