Skip to content

Michigan · Nonprofit

ROSCOMMON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING

ROSCOMMON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING (Michigan) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $3,499,254 to it, the largest being NORTHEAST MICHIGAN COMMUNITY SERVICE AGENCY INC ($3,498,525). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$2.6M
Funders on record
3
Grants received
$3.5M
Net assets
$2.5M
2/3 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 21%
01What it does

What Roscommon County Commission on Aging does

Mission

Provide nutritional and personal services to senior citizens of roscommon county - improving their quality of life.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Congregate meals - the agency served approximately 28,000 meals in three community centers

    $350,175 spent$73,301 earned by the program
    20% of program spending
  2. Home delivered meals - the agency delivered approximately 65,000 meals to senior residents in the roscommon county area.

    $875,438 spent$65,152 earned by the program
    50% of program spending
  3. The agency provided thousands of hours of home and personal service to seniors in the roscommon county area, in addition to several advocacy and social services.

    $525,262 spent$27,139 earned by the program
    30% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,750,875.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.8M) Expenses 100 ($1.4M) Net assets 100 ($875k)2018 Revenue 103 ($1.9M) Expenses 105 ($1.5M) Net assets 145 ($1.3M)2019 Revenue 109 ($2.0M) Expenses 139 ($2.0M) Net assets 149 ($1.3M)2020 Revenue 113 ($2.1M) Expenses 145 ($2.1M) Net assets 149 ($1.3M)2021 Revenue 124 ($2.3M) Expenses 146 ($2.1M) Net assets 173 ($1.5M)2022 Revenue 123 ($2.3M) Expenses 178 ($2.5M) Net assets 144 ($1.3M)2023 Revenue 131 ($2.4M) Expenses 152 ($2.1M) Net assets 173 ($1.5M)2024 Revenue 139 ($2.5M) Expenses 154 ($2.2M) Net assets 215 ($1.9M)2025 Revenue 141 ($2.6M) Expenses 140 ($2.0M) Net assets 284 ($2.5M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (141)Expenses (140)Net assets (284)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $1.8M to $2.2M (+18%).

$1.5M
$1.8M
$1.8M
$1.7M
$1.9M
$1.6M
$1.8M
$2.2M
$2.5M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 90% · 2018 89% · 2019 87% · 2020 93% · 2021 94% · 2022 90% · 2023 21% · 2024 19% · 2025 17%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

88% of ROSCOMMON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (81% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 11,793 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$418k
’17
$394k
’18
$32k
’19
$6k
’20
$210k
’21
−$257k
’22
$256k
’23
$364k
’24
$604k
’25
8.6
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Debra Looney

Executive director

Board chair

Roberta Kary

Chairperson

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2021 and FY2022 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed10101010101010910
Joined·+1+0+1+3+2+3+1+2
No longer listed·10132321
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $372k → $412k.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
'25*
total
funders
1
1
1
3
2
2
1
1
1

1 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 0% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of ROSCOMMON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

ROSCOMMON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING leans on a few funders — its largest provides 100% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund ROSCOMMON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING.

100%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of ROSCOMMON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING's grant income comes from Michigan funders.

MI

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Michigan out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $229 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

ROSCOMMON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 6,891 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin23% · top quartile
Months of reserve8.6mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)4% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,891 human services nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Organizations like ROSCOMMON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Michigan

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

88% of spending goes to programs.

Program 88%Management 10%Fundraising 2%

Governance

9
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

99%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for ROSCOMMON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds ROSCOMMON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING?
ROSCOMMON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING (Michigan) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $3,499,254 to it, the largest being NORTHEAST MICHIGAN COMMUNITY SERVICE AGENCY INC ($3,498,525). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does ROSCOMMON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING have?
IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $3,499,254 in grants to ROSCOMMON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of ROSCOMMON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING?
NORTHEAST MICHIGAN COMMUNITY SERVICE AGENCY INC is the largest funder on record, with $3,498,525 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like ROSCOMMON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Michigan. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Roscommon County Commission on Aging →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 3 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing