Skip to content
Norman Hugh and Regina S Mathews Fam Foundation Tr at a glance

· Private foundation

Norman Hugh and Regina S Mathews Fam Foundation Tr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$201kScience & Tech$101kHuman Services$95kHealth$83kReligion$59kHousing & Shelter$40kInternational$22kCivil Rights$19kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Salvation Army$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Seamark Ranch: $10k → 14%Seamark Ranch: $10k → 14%Hart Felt Ministries: $10k → 14%HartFelt Ministries: $5k → 14%Wounded Warrior Project: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

CA
CO
VA
AZ
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
MS
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$500k · 16 repeat orgs$127k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
16

Total granted

$500k
$102k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+7%

Still filing today

75%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’25
ReligionHuman ServicesInternationalCivil RightsHousing & ShelterHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $30k · revenue +36%
  • CK
    CLAYTON KING MINISTRIES
    2× · 2022–2023 · $30k · revenue +40%
  • AM
    Alpha-Omega Miracle Home Inc
    2× · 2021–2022 · $20k · revenue +150%

Funded once

  • BH
    Baptist Health Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • LH
    LIVING HOPE MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue -12%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lifesource Ministries Inc

Christ-centered organization dedicated to empowering women with the truth and hope they need to choose life. develop and distribution of informational and educational materials.

Health
2
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
3
Compassion Ministries
Religion
4
Vero Beach Crisis Pregnancy Ctr

Care net pregnancy center of indian river is a christ-centered ministry that builds upon the biblical principles of the sanctity of human life, sexual purity and adoption. care net is committed to providing compassionate help and practical…

Health
5
Intimate Life Ministries
—
6
Cross Made Me Ministries
Religion
7
Free to Worship Ministries

This church will be that place of emergency where people can come any time of day or night. We will be a place that will lead people back to health both spiritually and naturally.

Religion
8
Crossroads Clinic an Open Door for Life Choices Inc

Provide food, formula, diapers, baby clothing, maternity clothes, and misc items. Provide pregancy tests. Held parenting, prenatal and sexual integrity classes. Provided financial assistance. Received phone calls/office

Health
9
Passionlife Ministries Inc

Passionlife ministries is a global missions initiative to spread the gospel of life and expand the pregnancy help movement among nations plagued by abortion, infanticide and gendercide.

Religion
10
Jesus in Vietnam Ministries
Religion
11
Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry Inc

To glorify god by equipping the church with proper christian doctrine and to help non-believers come to a saving knowledge of jesus christ.

—
12
Fsi-Freedom Seekers International

Freedom seekers international is a christian organization that exists to rescue the most severely persecuted for their religious faith in hostile and restrictive countries. through collaborative partnerships we deliver those who are…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifeline Children's Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Clayton King Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

the University of Alabama: $301,500 · Otherthe University of AlabamaBaptist Health Foundation: $50,000 · OtherBaptist Health FoundationSalvation Army: $25,000 · OtherSalvation ArmyAlpha-Omega Miracle Home Inc: $20,000 · Other+14 more: $58,000 · Other+14 moreLIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $30,000 · ReligionLIFELINE CHIL…CLAYTON KING MINISTRIES: $30,000 · ReligionCLAYTON KING …SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $7,500 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S P…LIVING HOPE MINISTRIES: $6,000 · ReligionLIVING HOPE M…+1 more: $2,500 · ReligionSEAMARK RANCH INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesHART FELT MINISTRIES INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesCare Net: $15,000 · Civil RightsStudents for Life of America Inc: $4,000 · Civil RightsTHE CITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterMercy Ships International: $7,500 · InternationalCORNERSTONE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · InternationalCompassion International Incorporated: $2,000 · InternationalFirst Coast Womens Services Inc: $10,000 · Health
Other$454,500Religion$76,000Human Services$37,500Civil Rights$19,000Housing & Shelter$15,000International$14,500Health$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCLAYTON KING MINISTRIES: $30,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetAlpha-Omega Miracle Home Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSEAMARK RANCH INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCare Net: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHART FELT MINISTRIES INC: $15,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetFirst Coast Womens Services Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIVING HOPE MINISTRIES: $6,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCORNERSTONE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetStudents for Life of America Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJESUSONLINE MINISTRIES: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds CLAYTON KING MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Alpha-Omega Miracle Home Inc ↗
  • Who funds SEAMARK RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds Care Net ↗
  • Who funds THE CITY RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds HART FELT MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds First Coast Womens Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds LIVING HOPE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Students for Life of America Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds JESUSONLINE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charit…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA10.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Norman Hugh and Regina S Mathews Fam Foundation Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Norman Hugh and Regina S Mathews Fam Foundation Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 46%
  • Alpha-Omega Miracle Home Inc: 46% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Norman Hugh and Regina S Mathews Fam Foundation Tr’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home