Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nordon Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$87k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Animals$210kEnvironment$55kInternational$45kHousing & Shelter$20kFood & Nutrition$5kHuman Services$5kRecreation & Sports$2k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
$10,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROCKY MOUNTAIN ELK FOUNDATION$40,000
TUNNEL 2 TOWERS FOUNDATION$10,000
SAMARITANS PURSE$10,000
WORLD WILDLIFE FOUNDATION$10,000
THE HORSE SHELTER$5,000
MUSTANG HERITAGE FOUNDATION$5,000
MERCY CHEFS$5,000
SOUTH BAYFRONT SAILING ASSOCIATION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MERCY CHEFS: $5k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
NY
IN
CA
VA
NM
TN
NC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$300k · 7 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +106% since the first grant, against +71% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
2

Total granted

$300k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+106%
+71%

Still filing today

57%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsReligionFood & NutritionHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $45k · revenue +106%
  • NM
    NEW MEXICO BIOPARK SOCIETY INC
    3× · 2019–2023 · $45k · revenue +33%
  • NM
    NEW MEXICO WILDLIFE CENTER INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $18k · revenue +353%

Funded once

  • PA
    PAWS AND STRIPES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +71%
  • RF
    ROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Protection New Mexico

To protect animals by creating systemic change resulting in the humane treatment of all animals. we create policies, infrastructure, and services that protect animals and strengthen our communities, and we design and implement humane and…

Animals
2
Wildlife Rescue Inc of New Mexico

To rehabilitate and release to the wild, injured or orphaned animals rescued by members of the public. to come to the aid of displaced wildlife and the concerned people who find them. to teach scientifically correct information about new…

—
3
Santa Fe Animal Shelter and Humane Society Inc

To support animals, save lives, and spread compassion.

Animals
4
Liberty Sanctuary

Liberty sanctuary is a leading equine nonprofit dedicated to protecting americas most vulnerable horses and banning the slaughter of our cherished american equines. we rescue equines from the slaughter pipeline and offer comprehensive…

Animals
5
Animal Protection New Mexico Inc (Apnm)Foundation

The organization operates exclusively for the benefit and support of animal protection new mexico, which seeks to educate the public about and advocates campaigns that prevent cruelty to animals.

Animals
6
Sky Dog Sanctuary Inc

To rescue wild horses and burros from auctions or kill pens, blm short term holding pens or other situations that are dangerous for the welfare of a wild horse or burro. as well as reunite wild horse families to keep them together.

Animals
7
Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum

We inspire people to live in harmony with the natural world by fostering love, appreciation, and understanding of the sonoran desert.

Arts & Culture
8
Sky Mountain Wild Horse Sanctuary

Sky Mountain Wild Horse Sanctuarys mission is to create healthy ecosystems for wild horses and other wildlife while giving refuge for vulnerable mustangs where they roam free forever.

Unclassified
9
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County

The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…

Animals
10
Nevada Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Nevada spca saves the lives of southern nevada's most vulnerable pets, inspires human companions to uphold the best possible care and increases the human-animal bond through adoption, foster and preventative care.

Animals
11
New Mexico Pets Alive

New mexico pets alive offers hope for homeless pets by meeting the challenge with creativity and 21st century solutions inspired by the past 10+ years of success of neighboring states achieving no - kill communities (saving all healthy and…

—
12
Northcoast Marine Mammal Center

The northcoast marine mammal centers (nmmc) mission is to promote the long-term health of marine mammals along approximately two hundred miles of remote coastline in humboldt and del norte counties in northern california. the nmmc does…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Protect the Harvest; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ROCKY MOUNTAIN ELK FOUNDATION: $155,000 · OtherROCKY MOUNTAIN ELK FOUNDATIONTUNNEL 2 TOWERS FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherTUNNEL 2 TOWERS FOUNDATIONNEW MEXICO WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $17,500 · OtherNEW MEXICO WILDLIFE CENTER INCIndividual grant recipient: $12,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWORLD WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Other+1 more: $5,000 · OtherNEW MEXICO BIOPARK SOCIETY INC: $45,000 · AnimalsNEW MEXICO BIOPARK SO…PAWS AND STRIPES INC: $10,000 · AnimalsPAWS AND STRIPES INCMustang Heritage Foundation: $5,000 · AnimalsMustang Heritage Foun…THE HORSE SHELTER: $5,000 · AnimalsTHE HORSE SHELTERSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $45,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PU…ROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionMERCY CHEFS INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesSOUTH BAYFRONT SAILING ASSOCIATION: $2,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$220,000Animals$65,000Religion$45,000Food & Nutrition$5,000Human Services$5,000Public Safety & Disaster$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $45,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNEW MEXICO BIOPARK SOCIETY INC: $45,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetNEW MEXICO WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $17,500 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetPAWS AND STRIPES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMustang Heritage Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPROTECT THE HARVEST: $5,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHE HORSE SHELTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY CHEFS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH BAYFRONT SAILING ASSOCIATION: $2,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Albuquerque Community FoundationNM13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Albuquerque Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nordon Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nordon Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Nordon Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Nordon Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nordon’s filings →

    More from the funding graph