Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nogwog Fund Nfp

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$137k
Granted FY2024still arriving
52
Grants FY2024still arriving
14
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What it funds
0181% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$182kFood & Nutrition$101kHealth$89kHuman Services$56kHousing & Shelter$38kEnvironment$32kPhilanthropy$26kCivil Rights$16kOther$0
02FY2024 · 52 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k50 grants · $94k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $43k
$1,500
Median grant
14
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST MICHAELS EPISCOPAL CH$32,271
CHATWITHUSORG$10,558
PACCT$9,000
Individual grant recipient$6,050
CHANUTE AQUATORIUM SOCIETY$5,255
BISHOP ANDERSON HOUSE$5,000
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY$4,000
NOILFOODBANK$4,000
BACF$4,000
FRIENDS OF MARQUETTE PARK$3,250
FOOTPRINTS FOOD PANTRY$3,090
WORLD CENTER KITCHEN$3,089
BARRINGTON YOUTH AND FAMILY$3,000
FISHFOODPAN$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LETTUCE DREAM: $2k → 17%THE HOPE BUSS: $500 → 15%EMERGENCY CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES: $500 → 26%LETTUCE DREAM: $1k → 17%EMERGENCY CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES: $100 → 26%Crisis Center: $2k → 15%CRISIS CTR: $2k → 15%CRISIS CENTER INC: $2k → 15%CRISIS CENTER: $2k → 15%CRISIS CTR: $659 → 15%CRISIS CENTER INC: $500 → 15%BARRINGTON YOUTH AND FAMILY: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
IN
OH
CT
CA
CO
MO
KY
MD
NM
SC
DC
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$545k · 73 repeat orgs$160k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

73 repeat relationships: 39 still active in FY2024, 34 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

73
63

Total granted

$545k
$141k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+15%

Still filing today

38%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentHuman ServicesReligionFood & NutritionInternationalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HD
    HAVE DREAMS
    4× · 2020–2023 · $30k · revenue +36%
  • FI
    Footprints Inc Footprints Food Pantry
    4× · 2021–2024 · $16k · revenue +184%
  • TW
    THE WARREN CENTER INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $11k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • SM
    ST MICHAEL'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

—
2
Climate Leadership Council Inc

To develop and promote a carbon dividends framework - based on carbon fees whose revenues are rebated to citizens through dividends - as the most cost-effective, equitable, and politically viable climate solution.

Environment
3
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
4
Environment Next Inc

Environment next supports individuals, nonprofits and businesses around the world on solutions to complex climate issues. we provide leadership, outreach and communication support, grants, and investments to empower leaders and their ideas…

Environment
5
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
6
Eden Peopleplanet

To offer the dignity of fair employment to people living in impoverished communities, who become transformational agents of global forest restoration.

International
7
Climate Catalyst Inc

Climate catalyst sparks collective action to tackle the biggest climate challenges we face today: cutting emissions in heavy industries.

Environment
8
Climate Breakthrough Inc

To launch breakthrough climate mitigation efforts by identifying, supporting, and unleashing innovative leaders with transformative strategies.

Human Services
9
Center for Religion and Diplomacy Inc

Bridging religious considerations with global peacebuilding policy and practice

International
10
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition
11
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
12
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Have Dreams; the most unlike its peers is Lettuce Dream. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 150 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/44
Grantees still filing
30/44
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST MICHAELS EPISCOPAL CH: $73,050 · OtherST MICHAELS EPISCOPAL CHST MICHAELS ESPIC CHRCH: $58,350 · OtherST MICHAELS ESPIC CHRCHBISHOP ANDERSON HOUSE: $37,975 · OtherBISHOP ANDERSON HOUSEPACCT: $33,000 · OtherPACCTST MICHAEL'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $25,400 · Other+122 more: $379,189 · Other+122 moreHAVE DREAMS: $29,770 · Employment+1 more: $512 · Employment350ORG: $8,000 · EnvironmentSHIRLEY HEINZE LAND TRUST INC: $6,000 · EnvironmentCENTER FOR CARBON REMOVAL: $2,030 · EnvironmentEVERGREEN COLLABORATIVE: $2,030 · EnvironmentSTILLMAN NATURE CENTER: $1,500 · EnvironmentCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $1,050 · Environment+1 more: $498 · EnvironmentFISH FOOD PANTRY: $9,000 · Food & NutritionGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $4,000 · Food & NutritionBARRINGTON TOWNSHIP FOOD PANTRY: $3,500 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS CHICAGO: $3,144 · Food & NutritionCRISIS CENTER INC: $8,219 · Human ServicesBARRINGTON YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $3,000 · Human ServicesLETTUCE DREAM: $3,000 · Human ServicesEMERGENCY CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC: $600 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesREFUGEEONE: $5,500 · ReligionFRIENDS OF THE GROOM INC: $5,000 · ReligionLOVE INC OF LAKE COUNTY: $1,000 · ReligionSt Leonard's Ministries: $515 · ReligionLEGACY FOUNDATION INC: $5,593 · Philanthropy
Other$606,964Employment$30,282Environment$21,108Food & Nutrition$19,644Human Services$15,319Religion$12,015Philanthropy$5,593

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHAVE DREAMS: $29,770 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetFootprints Inc Footprints Food Pantry: $16,090 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetTHE WARREN CENTER INC: $11,116 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFISH FOOD PANTRY: $9,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCRISIS CENTER INC: $8,219 over 5y, 0.1% of budget350ORG: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS AT HOME: $6,598 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSHIRLEY HEINZE LAND TRUST INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLEGACY FOUNDATION INC: $5,593 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetREFUGEEONE: $5,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLAKESIDE SINGERS INC: $5,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetPACTT Learning Center: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE GROOM INC: $5,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetANDERSON UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSojourners Inc: $4,190 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $3,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMILLER BEACH ARTS & CREATIVE DISTRICT CDC: $3,600 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS CHICAGO: $3,144 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBARRINGTON YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLETTUCE DREAM: $3,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetREADING POWER INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetELMHURST UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR CARBON REMOVAL: $2,030 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEVERGREEN COLLABORATIVE: $2,030 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHumane Society of North West Indiana: $1,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSTILLMAN NATURE CENTER: $1,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFELLOWSHIP FOR PERFORMING ARTS INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $1,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN LEAGUE FOR THE HANDICAPPED DBA INSPIRATION MINISTRIES: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOVE INC OF LAKE COUNTY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFCNL EDUCATION FUND: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION: $660 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEMERGENCY CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC: $600 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $523 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSt Leonard's Ministries: $515 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GROUNDTRUTH PROJECT INC: $512 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Hope Buss Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $498 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC: $256 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HAVE DREAMS ↗
  • Who funds Footprints Inc Footprints Food Pantry ↗
  • Who funds THE WARREN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FISH FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds 350ORG ↗
  • Who funds MEALS AT HOME ↗
  • Who funds SHIRLEY HEINZE LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds LEGACY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds REFUGEEONE ↗
  • Who funds LAKESIDE SINGERS INC ↗
  • Who funds PACTT Learning Center ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE GROOM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL23.9× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · John W Anderson Foundation · Nisource Charitable Foundation · Yellow-Crowned Foundation · Porter County Community Foundation Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nogwog Fund Nfp funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nogwog Fund Nfp. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Nogwog Fund Nfp?

    Find your warmest path to Nogwog Fund Nfp through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 150 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nogwog Fund Nfp’s filings →

    More from the funding graph