Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Noel Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$124k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$38k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$310kHealth$157kHuman Services$61kEducation$29kYouth Development$26kPublic Benefit$5kHousing & Shelter$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $119k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$266k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY$38,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF EAST CENTRAL IL$28,000
CUNNINGHAM CHILDREN'S HOME$23,000
NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF IL$20,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
DON MOYER CLUB$3,000
C-U SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $62k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CU At Home: $500 → 19%CUNNINGHAM CHILDREN'S HOME: $23k → 19%CUNNINGHAM CHILDREN'S HOME: $23k → 19%Cunningham Children's Home: $15k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$528k · 9 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +68% since the first grant, against +40% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
2

Total granted

$528k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+40%

Still filing today

44%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NK
    NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $132k · revenue +68%
  • CC
    CUNNINGHAM CHILDRENS HOME OF URBANA IL
    3× · 2023–2025 · $61k · revenue +34%
  • DM
    DON MOYER BOYS & GIRLS CLUB
    7× · 2017–2023 · $26k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • CO
    C-U ONE TO ONE MENTORING SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $4k · revenue +40%
  • CA
    C-U AT HOME
    one grant, 2023 · $500 · revenue +17%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS — $132,000 · OtherNATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF ILLINOISCommunity Foundation — $92,000 · OtherCommunity FoundationUnited Way of Champaign Co — $86,000 · OtherUnited Way of Champaign CoUNITED WAY — $76,000 · OtherUNITED WAYCU Schools Foundation — $24,500 · OtherCU Schools Foundation+2 more — $15,000 · OtherCUNNINGHAM CHILDRENS HOME OF URBANA IL — $61,000 · Human ServicesCUNNINGHAM …+1 more — $500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF EAST CENTRAL ILLINOIS — $56,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY …DON MOYER BOYS & GIRLS CLUB — $26,000 · Youth DevelopmentPROMISE HEALTHCARE NFP — $25,000 · HealthC-U ONE TO ONE MENTORING SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION IN — $4,000 · Education
Other$425,500Human Services$61,500Philanthropy$56,000Youth Development$26,000Health$25,000Education$4,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS — $132,000 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetCUNNINGHAM CHILDRENS HOME OF URBANA IL — $61,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF EAST CENTRAL ILLINOIS — $56,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetDON MOYER BOYS & GIRLS CLUB — $26,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetPROMISE HEALTHCARE NFP — $25,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetC-U ONE TO ONE MENTORING SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION IN — $4,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetC-U AT HOME — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS
  • Who funds CUNNINGHAM CHILDRENS HOME OF URBANA IL
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF EAST CENTRAL ILLINOIS
  • Who funds DON MOYER BOYS & GIRLS CLUB
  • Who funds PROMISE HEALTHCARE NFP
  • Who funds C-U ONE TO ONE MENTORING SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION IN
  • Who funds C-U AT HOME

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Champaign CountyIL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Champaign County · Community Foundation of East Central Illinois · Wgrc Inc · Eastern Illinois Foodbank · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Noel Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Noel Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Noel Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph