Skip to content
Noah Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Noah Inc

Sale of donated furniture, clothing and other items with proceeds given to various organizations involved with providing care, shelter and medical attention to animals.

$267k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$77k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$1.2MOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $170k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $77k
$18,900
Median grant
1
States reached
$596k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$77,000
AARF ANIMAL RESCUE & SANCTUARY$25,400
DOGTREE PINES LLC$25,400
CATTY SHACK$21,300
CIRCLE L DOG RESCUE$19,800
YAVAPAI HUMANE TRAPPERS$19,500
BLUE MOON RESCUE & SANCTUARY$18,900
FREEDOM TAILS RESCUE$14,200
ANIMAL GUARDIAN NETWORK$13,500
FOR THE LOVE OF THE HOOF INC$11,700
CANINE RESCUE & ADOPTIONS INC$8,000
EQUINE EMERGENCY EVACUATION$6,000
UNITED ANIMAL FRIENDS$5,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FREEDOM TAILS RESCUE: $13k → 11%FOR THE LOVE OF THE HOOF: $15k → 11%ANIMAL GUARDIAN NETWORK: $14k → 14%FREEDOM TAILS RESCUE: $16k → 11%FREEDOM TAILS RESCUE: $15k → 11%FREEDOM TAILS RESCUE: $14k → 11%AARF ANIMAL RESCUE & SANCTUARY: $31k → 14%FREEDOM TAILS RESCUE: $14k → 11%AARF ANIMAL RESCUE & SANCTUARY: $25k → 14%FREEDOM TAILS RESCUE: $13k → 11%AARF ANIMAL RESCUE & SANCTUAR: $23k → 14%FREEDOM TAILS RESCUE: $13k → 11%DOGTREE PINES LLC: $26k → 14%FREEDOM TAILS RESCUE: $13k → 11%AARF ANIMAL RESCUE & SANCTUAR: $17k → 14%FREEDOM TAILS RESCUE: $13k → 11%DOGTREE PINES LLC: $25k → 14%AARF ANIMAL RESCUE & SANCTUAR: $16k → 14%DOGTREE PINES LLC: $22k → 14%AARF ANIMAL RESCUE & SANCTUAR: $14k → 14%CATTY SHACK: $21k → 14%BRADSHAW MOUNTAIN WILDLIFE: $12k → 14%DOGTREE PINES LLC: $15k → 14%AARF ANIMAL RESCUE & SANCTUAR: $12k → 14%BLUE MOON RESCUE & SANCTUARY: $19k → 14%BLUE MOON RESCUE & SANCTUARY: $17k → 14%BLUE MOON RESCUE & SANCTUARY: $16k → 14%BLUE MOON RESCUE & SANCTUARY: $11k → 14%AT LAST A HOME HORSE RESCUE: $11k → 14%FOR THE LOVE OF THE HOOF INC: $22k → 14%FOR THE LOVE OF THE HOOF INC: $12k → 14%HERITAGE PARK ZOO: $77k → 14%HERITAGE PARK ZOO: $33k → 14%HERITAGE PARK ZOO: $28k → 14%HERITAGE PARK ZOO: $24k → 14%COMMUNITY CATS: $19k → 14%HERITAGE PARK ZOO: $16k → 14%COMMUNITY CATS: $14k → 14%COMMUNITY CATS: $13k → 14%COMMUNITY CATS: $11k → 14%CIRCLE L DOG RESCUE: $24k → 14%CIRCLE L RANCH ANIMAL RESCUE: $23k → 14%CIRCLE L DOG RESCUE: $20k → 14%CIRCLE L RANCH ANIMAL RESCUE: $15k → 14%CIRCLE L RANCH ANIMAL RESCUE: $13k → 14%CIRCLE L RANCH ANIMAL RESCUE: $13k → 14%CIRCLE L RANCH ANIMAL RESCUE: $13k → 14%CIRCLE L RESCUE: $11k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 16 repeat orgs$83k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
6

Total granted

$1.1M
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+12%

Still filing today

56%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    COMMUNITY CATS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $97k · revenue +74%
  • YH
    Yavapai Humane Trappers Animal Search
    5× · 2021–2025 · $60k · revenue +183%
  • MK
    MISS KITTYS CAT HOUSE
    3× · 2017–2019 · $18k · revenue +296%

Funded once

  • BM
    BRADSHAW MOUNTAIN WILDLIFE
    one grant, 2017 · $12k · revenue +12%
  • AL
    AT LAST A HOME HORSE RESCUE
    one grant, 2017 · $11k
  • U
    UAF
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cat Tail Farms Feline Sanctuary

Animal rescue and housing

Animals
2
2nd Chance Ranch and Rescue

Sanctuary for abused or abandoned animals

Animals
3
Mountain View Animal Rescue

Rescue of abused or abandoned animals

Animals
4
Pom and the Hound Animal Refuge

Animal Welfare

—
5
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
6
Desert Dog Rescue Inc

Animal rescue

Animals
7
Pound Pets Inc

Animal Rescue - finding homes for abandoned animals in Granite City, spaying and neutering stray animals and feral cats

Animals
8
Fur Animal Rescue

Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.

Animals
9
Peppy Pet Rescue

rescue, rehabilitate, and rehome animals in need

Animals
10
Safe Haven Inc
Animals
11
Donna's Love Pet Rescue
Animals
12
Paws and Claws Animal Shelter
Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Animal Friends Inc; the most unlike its peers is For the Love of the Hoof Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $194,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAARF ANIMAL RESCUE AND SANCTUARY: $137,825 · OtherAARF ANIMAL RESCUE AND SANCTUARYFREEDOM TAILS RESCUE: $121,900 · OtherFREEDOM TAILS RESCUECIRCLE L RANCH ANIMAL RESCUE: $76,000 · OtherCIRCLE L RANCH ANIMAL RESCUECANINE RESCUE & ADOPTIONS INC: $68,550 · OtherCANINE RESCUE & ADOPTIONS INCCIRCLE L DOG RESCUE: $55,000 · OtherCIRCLE L DOG RESCUEDOGTREE PINES LLC: $36,580 · Other+7 more: $70,525 · Other+7 moreCOMMUNITY CATS INC: $96,800 · AnimalsCOMMUNITY CATS INCBLUE MOON RESCUE AND SANCTUARY: $82,200 · AnimalsBLUE MOON RESCUE AND SANCTUARYFOR THE LOVE OF THE HOOF INC: $60,700 · AnimalsFOR THE LOVE OF THE HOOF INCYavapai Humane Trappers Animal Search: $59,600 · AnimalsYavapai Humane Trappers Animal SearchDOGTREE PINES SENIOR DOG SANCTUARY: $51,100 · AnimalsDOGTREE PINES SENIOR DOG SANCTUARYANIMAL GUARDIAN NETWORK INC: $21,500 · AnimalsMISS KITTYS CAT HOUSE: $18,200 · AnimalsUNITED ANIMAL FRIENDS INC: $16,427 · AnimalsPrescott Animal Park Association: $16,300 · Animals+1 more: $12,000 · Animals
Other$760,880Animals$434,827

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY CATS INC: $96,800 over 8y, 15% of budgetBLUE MOON RESCUE AND SANCTUARY: $82,200 over 6y, 12% of budgetFOR THE LOVE OF THE HOOF INC: $60,700 over 5y, 7.9% of budgetYavapai Humane Trappers Animal Search: $59,600 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetDOGTREE PINES SENIOR DOG SANCTUARY: $51,100 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetANIMAL GUARDIAN NETWORK INC: $21,500 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetMISS KITTYS CAT HOUSE: $18,200 over 3y, 11% of budgetUNITED ANIMAL FRIENDS INC: $16,427 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetPrescott Animal Park Association: $16,300 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetBRADSHAW MOUNTAIN WILDLIFE: $12,000 over 1y, 16% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY CATS INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUE MOON RESCUE AND SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds FOR THE LOVE OF THE HOOF INC ↗
  • Who funds Yavapai Humane Trappers Animal Search ↗
  • Who funds DOGTREE PINES SENIOR DOG SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL GUARDIAN NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds MISS KITTYS CAT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED ANIMAL FRIENDS INC ↗
  • Who funds Prescott Animal Park Association ↗
  • Who funds BRADSHAW MOUNTAIN WILDLIFE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community Fou…Aetna Foundation IncNetwork for GoodAmerican Endowment Fo…Paypal Charitable Giv…Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Arizona Community FoundationAZ22× affinity9 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Endowment Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Noah Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Noah Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Noah Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Noah Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Noah’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home