· Public charity
Nmc Legacy Fund
NMC LEGACY FUND's goal is to build healthy, sustainable communities by providing essential funding for programs and services where existing gaps have been identified and that serve a social service need to our communities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $98,953 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $181,170 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $82,217 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $49k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Impact Christian Church | $37,374 |
| Canon City Parks and Rec | $13,040 |
| Radiant Church | $9,600 |
| Lakyns Legacy Foundation | $8,606 |
| Community of Caring | $8,040 |
| Universal Ministries of Truth | $6,324 |
| Friends of the Butte Theater | $5,719 |
| Boys and Girls Club - Fremont | $5,200 |
| Open Hearts & Open Doors | $5,050 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $835k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 26% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.
84 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 81 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEASTERN NEVADA4× · 2017–2020 · $314k · revenue +338%
- HHHORIZON HOSPICE INC4× · 2017–2020 · $218k · revenue +278% · 36% of their budget
- ESELKO SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER INC4× · 2017–2020 · $189k · revenue +141%
Funded once
- BMBATTLE MOUNTAIN CHURCH OF CHRIST INCone grant, 2017 · $12k
- NNNORTHEASTERN NEVADA CASAgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +30%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide substance abuse prevention & treatment.
To provide leadership and support to members assisting them to advance both professional and community interests in long term care facilities.
As nevada's federally designated primary care association, nvpca promotes access to affordable, comprehensive & quality health care for nevada's underserved populations. we support & advocate on behalf of member community health centers,…
Nevada HealthRight exists to serve the forensic healthcare needs of Nevada residents and visitors by providing excellence in clinical forensic healthcare services, violence prevention, education, and research.
Wild horse protection, preservation, rescue and care work.
Child abuse awareness and prevention
To lead, collaborate, coordinate, develop, and implement strategies and resources to end homelessness in Nevada and Placer counties.
Creating healthy paths to new heights by provviding services and programs that promote positive life choices and improve the quality of life.
To honor and preserve the legacy of our fallen brothers and sisters who have given their life in service to our country since nevada became a state in 1864
To uplift the indigenous community by building political power.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Resource Centers of Northeastern Nevada and the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Butte Theater. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 110 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEASTERN NEVADA ↗
- Who funds HORIZON HOSPICE INC ↗
- Who funds ELKO SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF NEVADA INC ↗
- Who funds NEVADA AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 329 ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds University of Nevada Reno Foundation ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds Nevada Outdoor School ↗
- Who funds Elko FISH ↗
- Who funds SENIOR CITIZENS OF HUMBOLDT CO INC ↗
- Who funds VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS POST 2350 ↗
- Who funds WINNEMUCCA MINISTERIAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds HUMBOLDT VOLUNTEER HOSPICE ↗
- Who funds Committee Against Domestic Violence Harbor House ↗
- Who funds WINNEMUCCA DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS FOR LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds WINNEMUCCA BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB RECREATION COMPLEX INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: NV Energy Charitable Foundation · Community Foundation of Northern Nevada · William N Pennington Foundation · The E L Cord Foundation · Union Pacific Foundation · John Ben Snow Memorial Tr Uw #839158 · Catholic Charities of Northern Nevada · United Way of Northern Nevada and the Sierra · Renown Health · America's Charities · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Nmc Legacy Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Nmc Legacy Fund?
Find your warmest path to Nmc Legacy Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.