Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Nina Heard Astin Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$809k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 44% of NINA HEARD ASTIN CHARITABLE TRUST’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 27 grants below total $396,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $808,500 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $412,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $66k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $155k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $175k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$7.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF BRYAN$75,000
BOYS CLUBS OF BRAZOS COUNTY INC$50,000
BRAZOS VALLEY REHABILITATION CENTER INC$50,000
HEARD NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM AND$25,000
HEALTH FOR ALL CLINIC INC$20,000
BRAZOS VALLEY FOOD BANK INC$15,000
BRYANCOLLEGE STATION HABITAT FOR HUMANI$15,000
BRAZOS INTERFAITH IMMIGRATION NETWORK$10,000
HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY INC$10,000
STILL CREEK BOYS RANCH INC$10,000
BRAZOS COUNTY RAPE CRISIS$10,000
BRYAN ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION$10,000
BRAZOS VALLEY MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY$10,000
VOICES FOR CHILDREN INC$10,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTH TEXAS$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $315k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GOODLAND INC: $12k → 24%CUMBERLAND PRESBYTERIAN CHILDRENS HOME: $9k → 8%GOODLAND INC: $12k → 24%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME AND SERVICES: $16k → 10%GOODLAND INC: $10k → 24%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME AND SERVICES: $15k → 10%GOODLAND INC: $8k → 24%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME AND SERVICES: $13k → 10%GOODLAND INC: $8k → 24%GOODLAND INC: $7k → 24%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME AND SERVICES: $5k → 10%GOODLAND INC: $6k → 24%GOODLAND INC: $2k → 24%VOICES FOR CHILDREN INC: $12k → 22%VOICES FOR CHILDREN INC: $10k → 22%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY INC: $10k → 22%VOICES FOR CHILDREN INC: $10k → 22%VOICES FOR CHILDREN INC: $10k → 22%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY INC: $10k → 22%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY INC: $10k → 22%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY INC: $10k → 22%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY INC: $10k → 22%HOSPICE OF BRAZOS VALLEY INC: $10k → 22%VOICES FOR CHILDREN INC: $10k → 22%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY INC: $10k → 22%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY INC: $8k → 22%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY INC: $8k → 22%VOICES FOR CHILDREN INC: $5k → 22%COLLEGE STATION ROTARY CLUB CHARITIES: $4k → 22%HOME BASE FOR TRANSITIONING FOSTER YOUTH: $10k → 22%BRAZOS VALLEY CARES INC: $10k → 22%UNITY PARTNERS DBA PROJECT UNITY: $6k → 22%STILL CREEK BOYS RANCH INC: $10k → 22%STILL CREEK BOYS RANCH INC: $10k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
MT
MA
OR
CA
VA
MD
KS
SC
OK
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.5M · 55 repeat orgs$431k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.

55 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2025, 30 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

55
59

Total granted

$3.5M
$421k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+9%

Still filing today

67%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    Boys Club of Brazos County Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $441k · revenue +51%
  • BV
    BRAZOS VALLEY REHABILITATION CENTER
    7× · 2019–2025 · $399k · revenue +10%
  • BS
    BRYAN-COLLEGE STATION HABITAT FOR HUMANI
    7× · 2017–2025 · $106k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • TM
    TEMPLE MEMORIAL PEDIATRIC CENTER INC
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue -41%
  • ES
    EASTER SEALS EAST TEXAS INC DBA BRAZOS VALLEY REHABILITATION CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • CA
    CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER FOR NORTH TEXAS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +4%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way of Brazoria County

To educate, unite and focus our community's resources in order to efficiently address the most critical needs of Brazoria County

Philanthropy
2
Scott & White Hospital-College Station

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
3
Texas College

To ensure that the student body experiences balanced intellectual, psychological, social and spiritual development, aimed at enabling them to become active productive members of society where they live and work.

Education
4
Brazos Valley Affordable Housing Corporation

To provide quality services and products to the residents and businesses of our community in such a way as to maximize the affordability of safe and decent housing, especially for the low income; and to serve as a vehicle and assist in any…

Community Improvement
5
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
6
Brazos Valley Council on Alcohol and Substance Abuse

To provide guidance and support for persons affected by alcohol and substance abuse.

Health
7
Baylor University Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
8
Baylor Regional Medical Center at Grapevine

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
9
Bosque School

To create transformative learning experiences that empower a diverse community of students to lead lives of intellectual curiosity, personal integrity, and compassionate contribution to a more just world.

Education
10
Family Promise of Bryan-College Station

To assist homeless families in securing stable housing

Housing & Shelter
11
Baylor Regional Medical Center at Plano

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
12
Hillcrest Baptist Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Brothers Big Sisters of South Texas Inc and the most unlike its peers is S O S Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDevelopmental Disabilities …Local History MuseumsChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Food Banks and PantriesCommunity FoundationsImmigrant Worker SupportDomestic Violence ServicesUnited Way AffiliatesMilitary Veterans SupportFaith-Based Social ServicesEquine Therapy ProgramsYouth Mentoring ProgramsOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Community College Foundatio…Youth Development CentersPregnancy Support ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…School District FoundationsHealth Access Advocacy and …Affordable Housing Construc…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%2%<5yr16%5%5–10yr20%5%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr10%30%35–55yr13%32%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%1%<5yr16%1%5–10yr20%23%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr10%30%35–55yr13%21%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/55
the rest of the field
15%
20,233/136,749

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 119 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
54/54
Grantees still filing
37/54
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF BRYAN TEXAS — $302,923 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF BRYAN TEXASCENTER FOR SCHOLARSHIP ADMIN INC — $255,750 · OtherCENTER FOR SCHOLARSHIP ADMIN INCTEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY — $220,000 · OtherTEXAS A&M UNIVERSITYFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF BRYAN — $154,500 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF BRYANFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $100,000 · OtherBRYAN-COLLEGE STATION HABITAT FOR HUMANI — $105,500 · OtherBRYAN-COLLEGE STATION HABITAT FOR HUMANI+72 more — $767,600 · Other+72 moreBRAZOS VALLEY REHABILITATION CENTER — $399,423 · HealthBRAZOS VALLEY REHAB…Health for All Inc — $142,000 · HealthHealth for All IncTEMPLE MEMORIAL PEDIATRIC CENTER INC — $50,000 · HealthTEMPLE MEMORIAL PED…Brazos County Rape Crisis Center Inc — $36,000 · HealthBrazos Maternal and Child Health Clinic — $32,000 · Health+2 more — $27,500 · HealthBoys Club of Brazos County Inc — $441,000 · Youth DevelopmentBoys Club of …YOUTH INC — $19,500 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL TEXAS — $17,000 · Youth Development+1 more — $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentHospice Brazos Valley Inc — $86,000 · Human ServicesHospice Br…GOODLAND INC — $64,500 · Human ServicesGOODLAND I…Voices for Children Inc — $57,000 · Human ServicesVoices for…PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES — $49,000 · Human ServicesPRESBYTERI…Still Creek Boys Ranch Inc — $20,000 · Human ServicesStill Cree…BRAZOS INTERFAITH IMMIGRATION NETWORK — $20,000 · Human ServicesBRAZOS INT…Unity Partners — $15,000 · Human ServicesCOLLEGE STATION ROTARY CLUB CHARITIES — $13,500 · Human Services+3 more — $29,423 · Human Services+3 moreBAYLOR UNIVERSITY — $103,500 · EducationBryan ISD Education Foundation — $81,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $10,000 · Education+10 more — $36,000 · EducationHEARD NATURAL SCIENCE MUSEUM AND WILDLIFE SANCTUARY INC — $52,000 · Arts & CultureBrazos Valley Museum of Natural History — $47,000 · Arts & CultureChildrens Museum of the Brazos Valley — $31,500 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF CHAMBER MUSIC — $9,000 · Arts & CulturePRESBYTERIAN MO-RANCH ASSEMBLY — $94,423 · ReligionS O S Ministries INC — $25,150 · Religion
Other$1,906,273Health$686,923Youth Development$482,500Human Services$354,423Education$230,500Arts & Culture$139,500Religion$119,573

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBoys Club of Brazos County Inc — $441,000 over 8y, 5.2% of budgetBRAZOS VALLEY REHABILITATION CENTER — $399,423 over 7y, 2.9% of budgetHealth for All Inc — $142,000 over 9y, 3.7% of budgetBRYAN-COLLEGE STATION HABITAT FOR HUMANI — $105,500 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY — $103,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN MO-RANCH ASSEMBLY — $94,423 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetHospice Brazos Valley Inc — $86,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBryan ISD Education Foundation — $81,000 over 9y, 3.8% of budgetGOODLAND INC — $64,500 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetTwin City Mission — $62,850 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetVoices for Children Inc — $57,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetBRAZOS VALLEY FOOD BANK INC — $55,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHEARD NATURAL SCIENCE MUSEUM AND WILDLIFE SANCTUARY INC — $52,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetTEMPLE MEMORIAL PEDIATRIC CENTER INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES — $49,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBrazos Valley Museum of Natural History — $47,000 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTH TEXAS INC — $47,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetBrazos County Rape Crisis Center Inc — $36,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetBrazos Maternal and Child Health Clinic — $32,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetChildrens Museum of the Brazos Valley — $31,500 over 6y, 5.7% of budgetS O S Ministries INC — $25,150 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER FOR NORTH TEXAS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetScottys House Brazos Valley Child Advocacy Center Inc — $22,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetStill Creek Boys Ranch Inc — $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBRAZOS INTERFAITH IMMIGRATION NETWORK — $20,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetUnited Way of the Brazos Valley — $19,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetYOUTH INC — $19,500 over 2y, 14% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL TEXAS — $17,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJunction Five-O-Five — $16,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetUnity Partners — $15,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCOLLEGE STATION ROTARY CLUB CHARITIES — $13,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetBRAZOS VALLEY CARES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetUnlimited Potential Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCUMBERLAND YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES — $9,423 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF CHAMBER MUSIC — $9,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCollege Station ISD Education Foundation Inc — $7,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH BRYAN COMMUNITY CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetBLUEBONNET EQUINE HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCASA OF EL PASO INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBrazos Employment Enterprises DBA The BEE Community — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWHEATON COLLEGE — $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SAINT MARY INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBrazos Valley Chorale — $4,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARY HARDIN-BAYLOR — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Boys Club of Brazos County Inc ↗
  • Who funds BRAZOS VALLEY REHABILITATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Health for All Inc ↗
  • Who funds BRYAN-COLLEGE STATION HABITAT FOR HUMANI ↗
  • Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN MO-RANCH ASSEMBLY ↗
  • Who funds Hospice Brazos Valley Inc ↗
  • Who funds Bryan ISD Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GOODLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds Twin City Mission ↗
  • Who funds Voices for Children Inc ↗
  • Who funds BRAZOS VALLEY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds HEARD NATURAL SCIENCE MUSEUM AND WILDLIFE SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds TEMPLE MEMORIAL PEDIATRIC CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Brazos Valley Museum of Natural History ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTH TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Brazos County Rape Crisis Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Brazos Maternal and Child Health Clinic ↗
  • Who funds Childrens Museum of the Brazos Valley ↗
  • Who funds S O S Ministries INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER FOR NORTH TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Scottys House Brazos Valley Child Advocacy Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Still Creek Boys Ranch Inc ↗
  • Who funds BRAZOS INTERFAITH IMMIGRATION NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds United Way of the Brazos Valley ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL TEXAS ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Winkler Nina Astin Tr…Edge Eugene III Chari…Orr Waldon H and Adel…Lucille and John B Do…Gilbert & Thyra Plass…M Bookman Peters Char…Mervin and Annete Pet…Marshall and Ellen Pe…Virginia & Christian …United Way of the Bra…Clifton C & Henrietta…Orr James Donald Char…
Winkler Nina Astin TrustMO68.6× affinity30 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Winkler Nina Astin Trust · Edge Eugene III Charitable Trust · Orr Waldon H and Adele Charitable Trust · Lucille and John B Dougherty Trust · Gilbert & Thyra Plass Charitable Trust · M Bookman Peters Charitable Foundation · Mervin and Annete Peters Family Foundation · Marshall and Ellen Peters Family Foundation · Virginia & Christian Groneman Charitable · United Way of the Brazos Valley · Clifton C & Henrietta C Doak Charitable · Orr James Donald Charitable Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Nina Heard Astin Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • Friends of Chamber Music — 1% of income from government
  • Wheaton College — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 119 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines