Skip to content

· Private foundation

Niemann Foods Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$89k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$308kHuman Services$68kEducation$51kArts & Culture$35kCommunity Improvement$25kYouth Development$24kHealth$15kReligion$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $65k
$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS$35,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$15,000
QUINCY UNIVERSITY$3,000
QUINCY NOTRE DAME FOUNDATION$3,000
QUINCY YMCA$2,500
CULVER STOCKTON COLLEGE$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
PALMYRA AREA MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE$1,000
SALVATION ARMY$1,000
QUINCY EXCHANGE$1,000
PLATT COUNTY ECUMENICAL FOOD PANTRY$1,000
QUINCY UNIVERSITY$1,000
DANVILLE TOWNSHIP FOOD PANTRY$1,000
DANVILLE TOWNSHIP FOOD PANTRY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CORNERSTONE FOUNDATION FOR FAMILIES: $3k → 13%CORNERSTONE FOUNDATION FOR FAMILIES: $2k → 13%CORNERSTONE FOUNDATION FOR FAMILIES: $2k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$550k · 15 repeat orgs$121k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
12

Total granted

$550k
$98k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+10%

Still filing today

27%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • QU
    QUINCY UNIVERSITY CORPORATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue +47%
  • QN
    QUINCY NOTRE DAME FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $15k · revenue +53%
  • CF
    CORNERSTONE FOUNDATIONS FOR FAMILI
    3× · 2017–2019 · $6k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • SI
    SOUTHEASTERN ILLINOIS COMMUNITY FND
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • QH
    QUINCY HOSPITALITY HOUSE
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
2
Simpson University

Simpson university is a christ-centered learning community committed to developing each student in mind, faith, and character for a life-time of meaningful work and service in a constantly changing world.

Education
3
Simpson College

Through innovative learning opportunities, individual student attention, and an unwavering commitment to inclusive educational access, simpson college cultivates a diverse community of learners to lead lives of meaning and purpose.

Education
4
Cabrini Legacy Corporation

See schedule o.education of the heart: cabrini university was a catholic institution of higher education. the cabrini legacy corporation exists to protect the legacy of the former university.cabrini university was a catholic institution of…

Education
5
Quinnipiac University

To build the university of the future with a strategy propelling us from our storied past toward an ambitious, inclusive & innovative future by preparing graduates as enlightened global citizens equipped for the challenges & opportunities…

Education
6
Superior Credit Union Inc

We promise to simplify your life. we promise to work in your best interest. we promise to help you build your financial future. we promise to provide products and services relevant to your needs. we promise to protect your privacy.

Arts & Culture
7
Lincoln University Aka Lincoln College

Lincoln college uniquely empowers students to realize their full potential

Education
8
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
9
Xavier University

Xavier is a jesuit catholic university rooted in the liberal arts tradition. our mission is to educate each student intellectually, morally, and spiritually. we create learning opportunities through rigorous academic and professional…

Education
10
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
11
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
12
College of Saint Mary

College of saint mary is a catholic university providing access to education for women in an enviroment that calls forth potential, fosters leadership, and is consistent with the works, values, and aspirations of the sisters of mercy.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dixon Family Ymca; the most unlike its peers is University of Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $315,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOISIndividual grant recipient: $75,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $45,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherSOUTHEASTERN ILLINOIS COMMUNITY FND: $25,000 · OtherQUINCY HOSPITALITY HOUSE: $25,000 · Other+24 more: $108,000 · Other+24 moreQUINCY UNIVERSITY CORPORATION: $18,000 · EducationQUINCY NOTRE DAME FOUNDATION: $14,500 · EducationCULVER-STOCKTON COLLEGE: $13,500 · EducationCORNERSTONE FOUNDATIONS FOR FAMILI: $5,500 · Human ServicesHOPE SPRINGS SAFE HOUSE INCORPORATE: $1,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$618,000Education$46,000Human Services$5,500Housing & Shelter$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetQUINCY UNIVERSITY CORPORATION: $18,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $15,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetQUINCY NOTRE DAME FOUNDATION: $14,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCULVER-STOCKTON COLLEGE: $13,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDIXON FAMILY YMCA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCORNERSTONE FOUNDATIONS FOR FAMILI: $5,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHOPE SPRINGS SAFE HOUSE INCORPORATE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS ILLINOIS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds QUINCY UNIVERSITY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds QUINCY NOTRE DAME FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CULVER-STOCKTON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds DIXON FAMILY YMCA ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE FOUNDATIONS FOR FAMILI ↗
  • Who funds HOPE SPRINGS SAFE HOUSE INCORPORATE ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS ILLINOIS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Quincy AreaIL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Quincy Area · Marion G Jackson Char Tr · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Niemann Foods Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Niemann Foods Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Niemann Foods Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Niemann Foods Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Niemann Foods’ filings →

    More from the funding graph