Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nicholas D Sergi Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$90k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$42k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$175kFood & Nutrition$171kEducation$104kPhilanthropy$53kHuman Services$47kHealth$40kScience & Tech$16kRecreation & Sports$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $42k
$3,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$689k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Bridge Food & Diaper Bank Inc$42,026
Cal's Angels$8,640
University of Chicago$5,000
Southern Lakes Evangelical Free Church$4,615
Casting for Recovery$3,605
Near South Planning Board$3,600
Elkhorn Food Pantry Inc$3,500
Patrick Grange Memorial Foundation$3,500
Elkhorn Area High School Scholarship Foundation$3,000
Special Olympics of Illinois$2,750
Elmhurst Memorial Hospital Foundation$2,587
Dare2Tri$2,500
Elkhorn Area School District$2,020
Love for Liam Foundation$1,561
LAZ Parking Charitable Foundation Inc$800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Hope House of South Central Wisconsin: $10k → 9%LAZ Parking Charitable Foundation Inc: $800 → 11%SPECIAL OPERATIONS CARE FUND: $500 → 13%LAZ Parking Charitable Foundation Inc: $800 → 11%LAZ Charitable Foundation: $750 → 11%THE LAZ CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $750 → 11%YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago: $400 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IL
WI
IA
PA
CT
CA
UT
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$347k · 23 repeat orgs$305k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
39

Total granted

$347k
$256k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+61%

Still filing today

57%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CASTING FOR RECOVERY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $15k · revenue +32%
  • University of Chicago
    2× · 2024–2025 · $10k · revenue +15%
  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS ILLINOIS
    4× · 2021–2025 · $9k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • SL
    Southern Lakes Church
    one grant, 2023 · $85k
  • SL
    SOUTHERN LAKE CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $40k
  • WC
    WALWORTH COUNTY FOOD DIAPER BANK
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicago Police Memorial Foundation

The foundation is a not-for-profit organization dedicated to honoring the lives of our fallen heroes. the foundation provides support and assistance to the families of chicago police officers who were killed or catastrophically injured in…

Arts & Culture
2
Gastro Intestinal Research Foundation Inc

The GI Research Foundation works to treat, prevent, and cure digestive diseases. In collaboration with the physicians and scientists at the University of Chicago Digestive Diseases Center, we fund innovative clinical and laboratory…

Health
3
Aids Foundation of Chicago

The aids foundation of chicago mobilizes communities to create equity and justice for people living with and vulnerable to hiv and related chronic disease.

Health
4
College of American Pathologists Foundation

Champion humanitarian & patient-centered roles for pathologists. connect those in need to the specialized, life savings skills of pathologists. confer training & awards to residents.

Education
5
Lurie Children's Surgical Foundation Inc

Provide pediatric and subspecialty surgical, research, and educational services.

—
6
The Chicago Bar Foundation

The chicago bar foundation brings the legal community together through advocacy, funding, and innovation to improve access to justice for people in need and to make the legal system more fair, equitable, and effective.

Education
7
Make-a-Wish Foundation of Illinois Inc

Together, we create life-changing wishes for children with critical illnesses.

—
8
University of Chicago Cancer Research Foundation

The mission shall be to provide fundraising, advocacy, and advisory support for cancer research at the comprehensive cancer center at the university of chicago.

Health
9
The Chicago Innovation Foundation
Philanthropy
10
The Chicago Home for Incurables

The primary purpose of the chicago home for incurables, ("the home"), is to provide financial support to the university of chicago for the operation of patient care facilities and funding of research of incurable diseases at the university…

Health
11
Chicago Survivors Inc

Offer crisis intervention, supportive counseling and comprehensive referral services to surviving family members throughout chicago following homicide; provide training in sensitive and effective communication with and treatment of…

Youth Development
12
The Foundation for Peripheral Neuropathy

The mission of the Foundation is to dramatically improve the lives of people living with peripheral neuropathy. It is focused on discovering more effective treatment options and finding a cure for peripheral neuropathy. The Foundation…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Southern Wisconsin Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Lyon Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/34
Grantees still filing
21/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Walworth County Food and Diaper Bank: $89,000 · OtherWalworth County Food and Diaper BankSouthern Lakes Church: $85,300 · OtherSouthern Lakes ChurchSOUTHERN LAKES EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH INC: $49,387 · OtherSOUTHERN LAKES EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH INCSOUTHERN LAKE CHURCH: $40,000 · OtherSOUTHERN LAKE CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $32,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWALWORTH COUNTY FOOD DIAPER BANK: $30,000 · OtherWALWORTH COUNTY FOOD DIAPER BANKELKHORN AREA HIGH SCHOOL: $29,090 · OtherELKHORN AREA HIGH SCHOOLElkhorn Area School District: $20,184 · OtherCal's Angels: $18,414 · Other+37 more: $105,039 · Other+37 moreWALWORTH COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC: $42,026 · Food & NutritionELKHORN FOOD PANTRY INC: $3,500 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $500 · Food & NutritionUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $26,100 · EducationUniversity of Chicago: $10,000 · EducationELKHORN AREA HIGH SCHOOL SCHOLARSHIP FOU: $7,000 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationTHE PATRICK GRANGE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION NFP: $22,000 · HealthCASTING FOR RECOVERY: $14,862 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,501 · Health+1 more: $500 · HealthHOPE HOUSE OF SOUTH CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesLAZ CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $3,100 · Human ServicesSPECIAL OPERATIONS CARE FUND INC: $500 · Human Services+1 more: $400 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE FOX RIVER VALLEY: $5,154 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN WISCONSIN INC: $2,577 · PhilanthropyBALESTRIERI FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $1,030 · PhilanthropyMOD COLLECTIVE: $518 · PhilanthropyChampions for Cures: $500 · PhilanthropyANNMARIE'S FOURSOME INC: $500 · Philanthropy+1 more: $106 · PhilanthropyDARE2TRI PARATRIATHLON CLUB: $7,624 · Recreation & Sports
Other$499,164Food & Nutrition$46,026Education$44,100Health$38,863Human Services$14,000Philanthropy$10,385Recreation & Sports$7,624

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $26,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PATRICK GRANGE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION NFP: $22,000 over 4y, 22% of budgetCASTING FOR RECOVERY: $14,862 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE LYON FAMILY FOUNDATION: $12,625 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetHOPE HOUSE OF SOUTH CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS ILLINOIS: $8,560 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDARE2TRI PARATRIATHLON CLUB: $7,624 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetELKHORN AREA HIGH SCHOOL SCHOLARSHIP FOU: $7,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE FOX RIVER VALLEY: $5,154 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEAR SOUTH PLANNING BOARD: $3,600 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetELKHORN FOOD PANTRY INC: $3,500 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetLAZ CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $3,100 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN WISCONSIN INC: $2,577 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE CHICAGO INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE-A-PET INC: $2,058 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKESHET: $2,022 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,501 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBALESTRIERI FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $1,030 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetLewis A Affetto Jr Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetVIP SERVICES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOD COLLECTIVE: $518 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW DAY WOMEN'S CLINIC INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAURORA AREA INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChampions for Cures: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSPECIAL OPERATIONS CARE FUND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY CHICAGO: $260 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF GREATER CHICAGO: $258 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK: $214 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $106 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WALWORTH COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE PATRICK GRANGE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION NFP ↗
  • Who funds UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS OF ILLINOIS INC ↗
  • Who funds CASTING FOR RECOVERY ↗
  • Who funds THE LYON FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HOUSE OF SOUTH CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds DARE2TRI PARATRIATHLON CLUB ↗
  • Who funds ELKHORN AREA HIGH SCHOOL SCHOLARSHIP FOU ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE FOX RIVER VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds NEAR SOUTH PLANNING BOARD ↗
  • Who funds ELKHORN FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds LAZ CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE CHICAGO INC ↗
  • Who funds SAVE-A-PET INC ↗
  • Who funds KESHET ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kunes Family FoundationWI21.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kunes Family Foundation · Motorola Solutions Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · United Way of Walworth County · Leopardo Charitable Foundation · Pentair Foundation · Usg Foundation Inc · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nicholas D Sergi Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nicholas D Sergi Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Nicholas D Sergi Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Nicholas D Sergi Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nicholas D Sergi’s filings →

    More from the funding graph