Skip to content

· Private foundation

Niamogue Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$217k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$59k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$1.3MInternational$85kHealth$69kArts & Culture$35kReligion$15kHousing & Shelter$13kHuman Services$10kFood & Nutrition$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $109k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Davidson College$59,000
Glen View Club Scholarship Foundation$50,000
Evans Scholar Foundation$25,000
Touch Foundation$25,000
St Ignatius College Prep$10,000
University of Pennsylvania$10,000
Brain Research Foundation$5,000
Parkinsons Foundation$5,000
Third Coast Percussion$5,000
St Clement Church$5,000
Colgate University$5,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING$5,000
Greater Chicago Food Depository$2,500
The Night Ministry$2,500
Urban Pathways$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $95k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%The Night Ministry: $3k → 14%TOUCH FOUNDATION: $35k → 17%The Night Ministry: $3k → 14%Touch Foundation: $25k → 17%TOUCH FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $3k → 14%TOUCH FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $3k → 14%TOUCH FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%Touch Foundation: $5k → 17%Touch FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 25% of Niamogue Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 23% of the giving stays in IL; by stated purpose, 60%.

Niamogue Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 18 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
7

Total granted

$1.1M
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+57%

Still filing today

61%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Davidson College
    4× · 2019–2025 · $644k · revenue +26%
  • BR
    BRAIN RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    6× · 2019–2025 · $35k · revenue +69%
  • MC
    MARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $23k · revenue +107%

Funded once

  • SI
    ST IGNATIUS OF CHICAGO
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • PS
    Parkinson Society
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
2
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
3
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
6
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
7
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
8
The Chicago Scholars Foundation

Chicago scholars is transforming the leadership landscape of our city by resolving the fundamental barriers to success for academically driven, first generation college students from under-resourced communities.

Education
9
University of Chicago

The mission of the university of chicago has been to sustain at the highest level of excellence, the communication of knowledge, the creation of knowledge and the fostering of a dynamic community of scholars and students.

Education
10
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
11
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
12
Manhattan University

Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Marine Corps Scholarship Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Glen View Club Scholarship Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Davidson College: $644,344 · EducationDavidson CollegeTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $385,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIAGLEN VIEW CLUB SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $100,000 · EducationGLEN VIEW CLUB SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION+4 more: $51,000 · EducationEvans Scholar Foundation: $50,000 · OtherEvans Scholar Fo…EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $37,500 · OtherEVANS SCHOLARS F…SAINT IGNATIUS COLLEGE PREP: $32,500 · OtherSAINT IGNATIUS C…MARIACHI HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherMARIACHI HERITAG…St Ignatius College Prep: $20,000 · OtherSt Ignatius Coll…Memorial Sloan-Kettering CANCER CENTER: $12,500 · OtherMemorial Sloan-K…MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $10,000 · OtherST IGNATIUS OF CHICAGO: $10,000 · Other+7 more: $28,500 · Other+7 moreTOUCH HEALTH INC: $85,000 · Human ServicesTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $10,000 · Human ServicesBRAIN RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $35,000 · HealthURBAN PATHWAYS INC: $12,500 · Housing & ShelterTHIRD COAST PERCUSSION NFP: $10,000 · Arts & CultureGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Education$1,180,344Other$226,000Human Services$95,000Health$35,000Housing & Shelter$12,500Arts & Culture$10,000Food & Nutrition$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDavidson College: $644,344 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $385,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGLEN VIEW CLUB SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetTOUCH HEALTH INC: $85,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetBRAIN RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetMARIACHI HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetMARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $22,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOLGATE UNIVERSITY: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN PATHWAYS INC: $12,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLycee Francais de Chicago Inc: $12,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHIRD COAST PERCUSSION NFP: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRISING LEADERS OF NORTH FLORIDA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNOURISHING HOPE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEART FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Davidson College ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds GLEN VIEW CLUB SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TOUCH HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds BRAIN RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARIACHI HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COLGATE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds URBAN PATHWAYS INC ↗
  • Who funds Lycee Francais de Chicago Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE NIGHT MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds THIRD COAST PERCUSSION NFP ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds RISING LEADERS OF NORTH FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds NOURISHING HOPE ↗
  • Who funds EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEART FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA12.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · The Chicago Community Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Niamogue Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Niamogue Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Niamogue Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Niamogue Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Niamogue’s filings →

    More from the funding graph