Skip to content
Newyork-Presbyterianbrooklyn Methodist at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Newyork-Presbyterianbrooklyn Methodist

To provide excellent healthcare services without regard to age, sex, race, creed, national origin or disability; to serve as an educational and research center for physicians, nurses and healthcare professionals; to provide health education to community residents.

$55M
Granted FY2022
8
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$54M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Health$54MRecreation & Sports$70kCommunity Improvement$68kHuman Services$29kEducation$16kReligion$7k
02FY2022 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $54,121,836, the rows itemized in this filing. The $55,499,248 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,377,412 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k4 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $42k
  • $250k+1 grant · $54M
$12,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KINGS PHYSICIAN SERVICES$54,055,836
CAMBA$15,000
Caribbean Women's Health Association$15,000
Prospect Park Alliance$12,000
Brooklyn Chamber of Commerce$8,500
Bedford Stuyvesant Restoration Corporation$7,500
CHiPS$5,500
Brooklyn Chinese-American Association$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%Brooklyn Chinese-American Association: $3k → 20%Brooklyn Chinese American Association: $1k → 20%CHiPS: $6k → 20%Caribbean Women's Health Association: $15k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

0%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$167k · 5 repeat orgs$54M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2022, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
6

Total granted

$167k
$48k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+27%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $54M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesEducationHealthHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    PROSPECT PARK ALLIANCE INC
    3× · 2017–2022 · $57k · revenue +189%
  • CI
    CAMBA INC
    4× · 2018–2022 · $46k · revenue +39%
  • CA
    CHINESE AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCIETY
    3× · 2017–2020 · $32k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • BB
    BROOKLYN BASEBALL CO LLC
    one grant, 2017 · $13k
  • BROOKLYN PUBLIC LIBRARY
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +6%
  • TH
    THE HOUSE OF THE LORD AND CHURCH ON THE MOUNT INC
    one grant, 2020 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Brooklyn Plaza Medical Center

Brooklyn plaza medical center, inc. is dedicated to improving the physical, spiritual, psycho-social and psychological well being of residents of north central brooklyn by providing the highest quality preventive comprehensive family…

—
2
Brooklyn Bridge Park Corporation

Brooklyn bridge park corporation's mission, d/b/a brooklyn bridge park ("bbp") mission is to provide an exceptional public space that connects people, nature, and the waterfront, through inclusive, innovative, and sustainable management…

Recreation & Sports
3
Downtown Brooklyn Neighborhood Alliance

Provide assistance to downtown brooklyn ny residents. Created to enhance quality of life in NYC and Brooklyn NY promotes a healthier enviornment through community outreach promote developed in the community benefits agreement and NETS…

Community Improvement
4
Brooklyn Community Pride Center Inc

Brooklyn community pride center uplifts and empowers lgbtq+ brooklynites through socially conscious and culturally responsive programs, partnerships and advocacy.

Civil Rights
5
Urban Strategiesbrookdale Family Care Center Inc

We provide greater access to high quality medical care and keep our communities healthy through an integrated care system that respects the diversity of our communities and addresses both the health needs and unique factors that shape them.

—
6
Physician Affiliate Group of New York Pc

To provide accountable, responsive quality care with the highest degree of sensitivity to the needs of our diverse, multilingual population while fulfilling the professional and educational needs of our members.

Health
7
Newyork-Presbyterianbrooklyn Methodist

To provide excellent healthcare services without regard to age, sex, race, creed, national origin or disability; to serve as an educational and research center for physicians, nurses and healthcare professionals; to provide health…

—
8
Bronx County Medical Society

Providing outstanding leadership in medicine by promoting excellence and innovation in clinical care, education, and public policy

Health
9
Community Health Action of Staten Island Inc

Community health action of staten island' drives dramatic improvements in the health of new yorkers.

Unclassified
10
Betances Health Center

Betances Health Center mission aims to remedy health disparities among individuals residing in underserved ethnically diverse neighborhood in the Lower East Side of Manhattan and Bushwick in Brooklyn

Health
11
The Real Estate Board of New York Inc

1. to unite in common organization those professionally engaged in real estate. 2. to protect and promote the mutual interests of its members. 3. to formulate and maintain ethical standards for the guidance of its members in their…

—
12
Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corp

To manage the brooklyn navy yard for the city of new york, specifically to expand job opportunities for new yorkers by fostering the development of small businesses.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Brooklyn Chinese-American Association Inc; the most unlike its peers is Public School 107 Parent Teacher Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KINGS PHYSICIAN SERVICES PC: $54,055,836 · HealthKINGS PHYSICIAN SERVICES PC+1 more: $32,128 · HealthPROSPECT PARK ALLIANCE INC: $57,000 · Recreation & SportsBROOKLYN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC: $28,500 · OtherBROOKLYN BASEBALL CO LLC: $12,500 · OtherTHE HOUSE OF THE LORD AND CHURCH ON THE MOUNT INC: $7,000 · OtherATLANTIC AVE ASSOC LOCAL DEVELOPMENT: $6,000 · OtherCAMBA INC: $45,500 · Community ImprovementCARIBBEAN WOMEN'S HEALTH ASSOCIATION: $15,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE INC: $5,500 · Human ServicesBROOKLYN CHINESE-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION INC: $3,500 · Human ServicesBROOKLYN PUBLIC LIBRARY: $10,000 · EducationAMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS: $6,747 · EducationPUBLIC SCHOOL 107 PARENT TEACHER ASSOCIATION INC: $5,500 · EducationBedford Stuyvesant Restoration Corporation: $7,500 · Housing & Shelter
Health$54,087,964Recreation & Sports$57,000Other$54,000Community Improvement$45,500Human Services$24,000Education$22,247Housing & Shelter$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKINGS PHYSICIAN SERVICES PC: $54,055,836 over 1y, 21% of budgetPROSPECT PARK ALLIANCE INC: $57,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCAMBA INC: $45,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHINESE AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCIETY: $32,128 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetBROOKLYN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC: $28,500 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetCARIBBEAN WOMEN'S HEALTH ASSOCIATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBROOKLYN PUBLIC LIBRARY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBedford Stuyvesant Restoration Corporation: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS: $6,747 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTIC AVE ASSOC LOCAL DEVELOPMENT: $6,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetPUBLIC SCHOOL 107 PARENT TEACHER ASSOCIATION INC: $5,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBROOKLYN CHINESE-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The New York and Pres…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The New York and Presbyterian HospitalNY15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The New York and Presbyterian Hospital · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Newyork-Presbyterianbrooklyn Methodist funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Newyork-Presbyterianbrooklyn Methodist. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Newyork-Presbyterianbrooklyn Methodist’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home