Skip to content

· Private foundation

Newby Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$171k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Philanthropy$2.7MArts & Culture$1.3MAnimals$287kInternational$89kHealth$59kHuman Services$26kRecreation & Sports$17kReligion$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $141k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEALTH WAGON$25,000
FOXIE G FOUNDATION$25,000
PARTNERS IN HEALTH$25,000
MONTGOMERY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$25,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN MASS$25,000
WESTERN MASS CLIMBERS COALITION$16,000
AMHERST SURVIVAL CENTER$5,000
KESTREL LAND TRUST$5,000
AMHERST FAMILY OUTREACH$5,000
TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS$5,000
AMHERST CINEMA$2,880
DOWNTOWN AMHERST FOUNDATION$2,500
USBC FOUNDATION$1,000
WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY$1,000
WILISTON NORTHAMPTON SCHOOL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 9% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WESTERN MASS CLIMBERS COALITION: $16k → 12%WARICK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $915 → 14%TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $5k → 16%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN MASS: $25k → 17%USBC FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%ARCHBISHOP CARROLL: $1k → 14%WESTERN SUN FOUNDATION: $1k → 21%WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $1k → 7%BUILD ON: $25k → 9%HEALTH WAGON: $25k → 22%FOXIE G FOUNDATION: $150k → 6%MONTGOMERY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $25k → 8%WESTERN MASS CLIMBERS COALITION: $1k → 12%WARICK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN MASS: $5k → 17%USBC FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%WESTERN SUN FOUNDATION: $511 → 21%WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $1k → 7%BUILD ON: $5k → 9%HEALTH WAGON: $25k → 22%FOXIE G FOUNDATION: $25k → 6%MONTGOMERY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $25k → 8%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN MASS: $5k → 17%BUILD ON: $4k → 9%HEALTH WAGON: $5k → 22%FOXIE G FOUNDATION: $25k → 6%MONTGOMERY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $11k → 8%WILISTON NORTHAMPTON SCHOOL: $1k → 12%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN MASS: $1k → 17%HEALTH WAGON: $4k → 22%FOXIE FOUNDATION: $15k → 6%FRANKLIN & B NEWBY FUND: $1.3M → 8%WILISTON NORTHAMPTON SCHOOL: $1k → 12%DAKIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $10k → 17%PARTNERS IN HEALTH: $25k → 6%NEWMAN CATHOLIC CENTER: $1k → 12%DAKIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $1k → 17%PARTNERS IN HEALTH: $25k → 6%AMHERST FAMILY OUTREACH: $5k → 12%PARTNERS IN HEALTH: $5k → 6%AMHERST FAMILY OUTREACH: $5k → 12%KESTREL LAND TRUST: $5k → 12%AMHERST CINEMA: $3k → 12%DOWNTOWN AMHERST FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%AMHERST FAMILY OUTREACH: $3k → 12%FAMILY OUTREACH OF AMHERST: $1k → 12%DOWNTOWN AMHERST FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%KESTREL LAND TRUST: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MA
OH
CT
CA
NE
VA
MD
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

12%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$532k · 17 repeat orgs$4.0M to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
8

Total granted

$532k
$4.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+80%

Still filing today

59%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEnvironmentEducationHealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    THE FOXIE G FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $215k · revenue +67%
  • PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $55k · revenue +4%
  • BUILDON INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $34k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • CS
    CHARLES SWCHWABTRISH ROME FUND
    one grant, 2024 · $1.3M
  • LA
    LAURA AND ANDREWS NEWBY FAMILY FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $1.3M
  • FB
    FRANKLIN & B NEWBY FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $1.3M
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
2
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
3
Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.

Animals
4
Danbury Animal Welfare Society

Danbury animal welfare society , inc.(daws) is a non-profit organization dedicated to improving the lives of animals in our community and beyond. we promote responsible pet guardianship and the humane treatment of animals, and work toward…

Animals
5
Wilton Land Conservation Trust

Protecting, enhancing and conserving open spaces encompassing meadows, woodlands, wetlands, and waterways in the town of wilton ct.

Environment
6
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
7
Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc

Protect Connecticuts farmland for agricultural use by purchasing and accepting donations of agricultural conservation easements

Food & Nutrition
8
Franklin Land Trust Inc

The franklin land trust works to conserve farms, forests, wildlands, and other natural resources significant to the quality of the environment, economy, and rural character of western massachusetts.

Environment
9
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
10
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment
11
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
12
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Survival Centers Inc; the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHARLES SWCHWABTRISH ROME FUND: $1,320,000 · OtherCHARLES SWCHWABTRISH ROME FUNDLAURA AND ANDREWS NEWBY FAMILY FUND: $1,320,000 · OtherLAURA AND ANDREWS NEWBY FAMILY FUNDFRANKLIN & B NEWBY FUND: $1,320,000 · OtherFRANKLIN & B NEWBY FUND+14 more: $130,256 · OtherTHE FOXIE G FOUNDATION INC: $215,000 · AnimalsMONTGOMERY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $11,000 · AnimalsDAKIN PIONEER VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $11,000 · AnimalsST MARYS HEALTH WAGON INC: $58,500 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $55,000 · HealthBUILDON INC: $33,500 · InternationalSURVIVAL CENTERS INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesKESTREL LAND TRUST INC: $6,000 · EnvironmentTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $5,000 · EnvironmentTHE WILLISTON NORTHAMPTON SCHOOL: $2,000 · EducationWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · Education
Other$4,090,256Animals$237,000Health$113,500International$33,500Human Services$25,000Environment$11,000Education$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE FOXIE G FOUNDATION INC: $215,000 over 4y, 19% of budgetST MARYS HEALTH WAGON INC: $58,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $55,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBUILDON INC: $33,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSURVIVAL CENTERS INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMONTGOMERY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $11,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetDAKIN PIONEER VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetKESTREL LAND TRUST INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DOWNTOWN AMHERST FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetAMHERST CINEMA ARTS CENTER INC: $2,880 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WILLISTON NORTHAMPTON SCHOOL: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE FOXIE G FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MARYS HEALTH WAGON INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds BUILDON INC ↗
  • Who funds SURVIVAL CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds DAKIN PIONEER VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds KESTREL LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS ↗
  • Who funds THE DOWNTOWN AMHERST FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMHERST CINEMA ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WILLISTON NORTHAMPTON SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Western MassachusettsMA15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Western Massachusetts · The Lorber Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Newby Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Newby Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Survival Centers Inc: 9% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Reservations: 2% of income from government
  • Amherst Cinema Arts Center Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Wesleyan University: 1% of income from government
  • The Downtown Amherst Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Newby Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Newby Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Newby’s filings →

More from the funding graph