· Private foundation
New York Jets Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k60 grants · $165k
- $10k–50k19 grants · $370k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $404k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE | $164,804 |
| LUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE | $87,186 |
| ATLANTIC HEALTH SYSTEM | $51,650 |
| FOUNDATION FOR MORRISTOWN | $50,000 |
| FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC | $50,000 |
| SOLDIERS TO SIDELINES | $47,100 |
| BOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION | $26,459 |
| BROOKLYN COMMUNITY SERVICES | $25,000 |
| ALL STARS PROJECT INC | $25,000 |
| NEW YORK URBAN LEAGUE | $25,000 |
| OUTREACH INC | $23,330 |
| ATLANTIC HEALTH SYSTEM | $20,802 |
| YEAR UP INC | $20,487 |
| ASSOCIATED HUMANE SOCIETIES INC | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $311k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +6% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
27 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 55 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $258k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- STSoldiers to Sidelines5× · 2020–2024 · $219k · revenue +483%
- TFTHE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC4× · 2020–2024 · $203k · revenue +32%
- SOSTOMP OUT BULLYING CORP4× · 2021–2024 · $115k · revenue +6%
Funded once
- UWUNITED WAY OF NEW YORK CITYgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue +42%
- UWUNITED WAY OF LONG ISLANDone grant, 2020 · $125k · revenue -2%
- RSRevived Soldiers Ukraineone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -3%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To connect and empower the youth soccer community.
To work in service to soccer and ignite a national passion for the game. work with members, partners, donors, and board to grow awareness and participation of the game, through soccer everywhere, soccer success, and soccer investment.
To create "a better world through rugby" by providing young people, primarily from underserved backgrounds, with a vitality for life both on and off the rugby field.
Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.
The base ball, inc. d/b/a the base is a not-for-profit organization working to shift the national mindset and re-imagine pathways to success for urban youth. founded in roxbury, ma, the base operates in boston and on the westside of…
Police athletic league, together with nypd and the law enforcement community, supports and inspires new york city youth to realize their full individual potential as productive members of society.
The Albany Knickerbockers Rugby Football Club was established in 1973. Building off a strong foundation begun by the clubs founders, the club eventually advanced to field a competitive Division I Men's side. The success of the club…
The program was formed to foster, promote, encourage and support the playing of soccer in the city of rye, new york.
Usa football's mission is to lead, strengthen and grow football for all. as the sport's governing body, usa football authors and delivers best-in-class resources and standards for every family member to pursue and enjoy america's favorite…
To foster the physical, mental, and emotional growth and development of america's youth through the sport of soccer at all levels of age and competition.
To foster the growth of amateur baseball in the united states and to organize national and international baseball competitions.
Harlem lacrosse's mission is to empower the children who are most at risk for academic decline and dropout to rise above their challenges and reach their full potential. harlem lacrosse inspires children to dream about tomorrow while…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Brothers Big Sisters of New York City Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sports Life Global. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 14% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 198 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF NEW YORK CITY ↗
- Who funds Soldiers to Sidelines ↗
- Who funds THE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds RAZOM INC ↗
- Who funds NOVA UKRAINE ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF LONG ISLAND ↗
- Who funds STOMP OUT BULLYING CORP ↗
- Who funds Revived Soldiers Ukraine ↗
- Who funds PLAST CONFERENCE INC ↗
- Who funds UKRAINE HOUSE DC FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗
- Who funds ALL STARS PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds EAST BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YEAR UP INC ↗
- Who funds THE NEW YORK URBAN LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds SECTION IX ATHLETIC COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds PLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC ↗
- Who funds BROOKLYN BUREAU OF COMMUNITY SERVICE ↗
- Who funds OVERLOOK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Chilton Medical Center Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds TUESDAY'S CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds WEDIFFERENT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Nfl Foundation Inc · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Investors Foundation Inc · Atlantic Health System Inc Group Return · Brooklyn Community Foundation · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Morgan Stanley Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · American Express Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization New York Jets Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Delaware State University — 18% of income from government
- Freedom House Inc — 4% of income from government
- Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to New York Jets Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to New York Jets Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.