· Private foundation
New Visions Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 22 grants below total $518,807 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $599,421 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $80,614 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k21 grants · $469k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Southern Partners Fund | $50,000 |
| United Negro College Fund (UNCF) | $40,000 |
| Ebenezer Baptist Church | $37,500 |
| Peace Development Fund | $35,000 |
| Cooperative Development Institute | $30,000 |
| Institute For Local Self-Reliance | $30,000 |
| Vermont Community Foundation | $26,000 |
| Ebenezer Baptist Church | $25,000 |
| New Economy Coalition | $25,000 |
| James and Grace Lee Boggs Center to Nurture Community Leadership | $25,000 |
| Highlander Research & Education Center | $25,000 |
| Claflin University | $20,000 |
| University of Vermont and State Agricultural College Foundation | $20,000 |
| United for a Fair Economy | $20,000 |
| Shaw University | $20,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
39 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 23 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NENEW ECONOMY COALITION INC4× · 2020–2024 · $173k · revenue +73%
- UFUnited for A Fair Economy Inc4× · 2020–2024 · $150k · revenue +35%
- IFINSTITUTE FOR LOCAL SELF RELIANCE4× · 2020–2024 · $110k · revenue +137%
Funded once
- TWTHE WORKING WORLD INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +131%
- UWUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INCone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -50%
MOVEMENT STRATEGY CENTERone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -26%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
New Roots Institute is a nonprofit empowering the next generation with knowledge and training to end factory farming.
Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…
We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.
Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.
Improving the transparency and scientific integrity of climate solutions through open data and tools.
The charitable activities of the Good Work Institute are designed to strengthen collaboration; address legacies of unequal power; and encourage a transition to regenerative ecological and social systems.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
We empower directors and transform boards to be future ready.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Goodpower Education Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Art Story Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SOUTHERN PARTNERS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Peace Development Fund ↗
- Who funds NEW ECONOMY COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds United for A Fair Economy Inc ↗
- Who funds THE JAMES AND GRACE LEE BOGGS CTR TO NURTURE COMMUNITY LEADERSHIP ↗
- Who funds HIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR LOCAL SELF RELIANCE ↗
- Who funds COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds RURAL ADVANCEMENT FOUNDATION INTERNATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds ECOAMERICA ↗
- Who funds CROSSROADS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR HUMANE EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds ANGELIC ORGANICS LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE CORNUCOPIA INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds GODDARD COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds METAFOUNDATION DBA POST CARBON INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Martin Luther King Sr Community Resources Collaborative ↗
- Who funds THE SHAW UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ILLINOIS STEWARDSHIP ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds CLAFLIN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE VERMONT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Infact DBA Corporate Accountability ↗
- Who funds Rural Coalition ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES ↗
- Who funds COOPERATIVE FUND OF THE NORTHEAST INC ↗
- Who funds THE WORKING WORLD INC ↗
- Who funds Talladega College ↗
- Who funds BETHUNE-COOKMAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds DILLARD UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC ↗
- Who funds MOVEMENT STRATEGY CENTER ↗
- Who funds Organic Growers School Inc ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL JUSTICE ECOLOGY PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR NEIGHBORHOOD TECHNOLOGY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Impactassetsinc · Rsf Social Finance Inc · The Vermont Community Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Tides Foundation · Clif Family Foundation · Farm Aid Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · Natural Resources Defense Council Inc · Patagoniaorg · The Schmidt Family Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to New Visions Foundation?
Find your warmest path to New Visions Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.