· Private foundation
New Tamarind Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $3k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
- $50k–250k11 grants · $1.6M
- $250k+9 grants · $6.8M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MONMOUTH UNIVERSITY | $2,252,012 |
| THE FOODBANK OF MONMOUTH AND OCEAN COUNTIES INC DBA FULFILL | $1,004,615 |
| BRUCE SPRINGSTEEN ARCHIVES AND CENTER FOR AMERICAN MUSIC CORPORATION | $1,001,006 |
| HACKENSACK MERIDIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION | $997,046 |
| VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE BERKSHIRES INC | $400,000 |
| PINELANDS PRESERVATION ALLIANCE | $325,000 |
| LUNCH BREAK | $300,000 |
| ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC | $250,000 |
| CIVICA FOUNDATION | $250,000 |
| PLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND | $225,000 |
| NEW JERSEY LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND | $200,000 |
| NEW JERSEY HIGHLANDS COALITION | $175,000 |
| LONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY | $165,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF MONMOUTH AND OCEAN COUNTIES | $150,000 |
| MONMOUTH CONSERVATION FOUNDATION | $135,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +13% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5.3M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AMAmerican Museum of Natural History2× · 2020–2021 · $6k · revenue +25%
- WCWildlife Conservation Society2× · 2020–2021 · $2k · revenue +57%
NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH2× · 2020–2021 · $1k · revenue +13%
Funded once
- CCCHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $10M
- TMTHE MOLLYLOU FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $853k · revenue -65% · 33% of their budget
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +40%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse
Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
New jersey lcv is the statewide political voice for the environment. working with our allies in the community, we advocate for strong environmental policies, support our environmental justice partners in pursuing more equitable policies,…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is The Mollylou Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MONMOUTH UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD & WATER WATCH ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE FOODBANK OF MONMOUTH AND OCEAN COUNTIES INC D/B/A FULFILL ↗
- Who funds BRUCE SPRINGSTEEN ARCHIVES AND CENTER FOR AMERICAN MUSIC CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE MOLLYLOU FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LUNCH BREAK INC ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE-BERKSHIRES INC ↗
- Who funds PINELANDS PRESERVATION ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC ↗
- Who funds CIVICA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC ↗
- Who funds NEW JERSEY LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds NEW JERSEY HIGHLANDS COALITION ↗
- Who funds LONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF MONMOUTH AND OCEAN COUNTIES ↗
- Who funds MONMOUTH CONSERVATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Parker Family Health Center Inc ↗
- Who funds MONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MERIDIAN PRIME INC ↗
- Who funds HABCORE INC ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION OF NEW JERSEY ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSIONS ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds American Museum of Natural History ↗
- Who funds FARM SANCTUARY INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds GROUP FOR THE EAST END INC ↗
- Who funds Vin Gopal Civic Association ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE UPPER EAST SIDE HISTORIC DISTRICTS INC ↗
- Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
- Who funds LONG ISLAND PINE BARRENS SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds DOROT INC ↗
- Who funds THE WHITE COAT WASTE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds THE LAWFARE PROJECT INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Jersey Natural Gas Company Charity Inc · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Oceanfirst Foundation · The Stone Foundation of New Jersey · Citizens Philanthropic Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Geraldine R Dodge Foundation Inc · Investors Foundation Inc · Columbus Foundation · The Mollylou Foundation · New Jersey Conservation Foundation · New Jersey League of Conservation Voters Education Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization New Tamarind Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Habcore Inc — 50% of income from government
- Pinelands Preservation Alliance — 35% of income from government
- Volunteers in Medicine-Berkshires Inc — 10% of income from government
- Lunch Break Inc — 4% of income from government
- Monmouth University Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to New Tamarind Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to New Tamarind Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.