Skip to content
New River Valley Health Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

New River Valley Health Foundation

NEW RIVER VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION (the foundation) is a tax-exempt, nonstock, nonprofit corporation organized to promote and foster the development of community health activities for charitable and educational purposes in the new river valley.

$3.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$1.3M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$7.1MHealth$774kHuman Services$756kFood & Nutrition$137kCommunity Improvement$90kCrime & Legal$40kReligion$28kArts & Culture$24kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k12 grants · $200k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $617k
  • $250k+3 grants · $2.3M
$44,333
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RADFORD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$1,335,000
VCOM - EDWARD VIA COLLEGE OF OSEOPATHIC MEDICINE$500,000
NEW RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE$470,000
FLOYD COUNTY CARES INC$184,000
FREE CLINIC OF PULASKI COUNTY INC$107,500
WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF NRV$100,000
PULASKI COUNTY CHRISTMAS STORE INC$72,000
VITTLES FOR VETS$53,334
MONTGOMERY COUNTY CHRISTMAS STORE$50,000
PULASKI COUNTY VA - BOARD OF SUPERVISORS$50,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NEW RIVER VALLEY INC$44,333
NEW RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE (EXCROW D HAMRICK)$28,637
MONTGOMERY MUSEUM & LEWIS MILLER CENTER$24,000
PLENTY$15,000
LANTO GRIFFIN FOUNDATION$14,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $297k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FLOYD COUNTY CARES INC: $184k → 12%PULASKI ADULT DAY SERVICE AND FALL PREVENTION CENTER: $20k → 14%PULASKI ADULT DAY SERVICE & FALL PREVENTION CENTER: $10k → 14%PULASKI ADULT DAY SERVICE AND FALL PREVENTION CENTER: $10k → 14%THE AGAPE CENTER OF NEW RIVER VALLEY: $10k → 21%THE AGAPE CENTER OF NEW RIVER VALLEY: $10k → 21%THE AGAPE CENTER OF NEW RIVER VALLEY: $8k → 21%PULASKI ADULT DAY CARE SERVICE & FALL PREVENTION CENTER: $25k → 14%PULASKI ADULT DAY CARE SERVICE & FALL PREVENTION CENTER: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.4M · 16 repeat orgs$556k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +58% since the first grant, against +48% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
4

Total granted

$8.4M
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+48%

Still filing today

75%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $501k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesFood & NutritionCrime & LegalEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NR
    NEW RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2018–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +55% · 26% of their budget
  • EV
    EDWARD VIA VIRGINIA COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +32%
  • WR
    WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF THE NEW RIVER VALLEY INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $330k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • CC
    Carilion Clinic Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $17k · revenue +48%
  • DC
    DEPAUL COMMUNITY RESOURCESgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue +29%
  • ME
    MCHARG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northern Virginia Health Foundation
Philanthropy
2
Central Virginia Health Services Inc

Central virginia health services, inc. (organization) is a non-profit health care organization with locations in bowling green, charles city, new canton, charlotte court house, farmville, alberta, petersburg, aylett, hopewell, montross,…

Health
3
Bradley Free Clinic of Roanoke Valley Inc

The mission of the bradley free clinic is to provide compassionate and comprehensive health care services in partnership with high quality professional volunteers for underserved residents of the roanoke valley and surrounding areas.

—
4
Caring Hearts Free Clinic of Patrick County Inc

To provide free, non-judgmental, quality healthcare to those in need by using a solid base of culturally diverse community resources.

Health
5
Free Clinic of Franklin County Inc

The free clinic of franklin county, inc is founded on the belief that everyone should have access to quality, affordable, primary health care regardless of their socio-economic or insurance status.

—
6
Free Clinic of Central Virginia Inc

The primary exempt purpose of the free clinic of central virginia, inc. is to provide free medical, dental, and pharmaceutical care to indigent persons.

Health
7
Uva Community Health Inc

Our mission: transforming health and inspiring hope for all virginians and beyond. our vision: to be the nation's leading public academic health system and a best place to work - while transforming patient care, research, education, and…

Health
8
Uva Culpeper Medical Center

Our mission transforming health and inspiring hope for all virginians and beyond. our vision to be the nation's leading public academic health system and a best place to work - while transforming patient care, research, education, and…

Health
9
Virginia Press Foundation Virginia Local News Project
Civil Rights
10
Richmond County Medical Society

The organization's mission is to promote services to patients and promote effective patient care, staff development, and program development.

Human Services
11
Piedmont Regional Dental Clinic Inc

Piedmont regional dental clinic, inc is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing affordable dental services to underserved residents in the piedmont region of virginia.

Health
12
Miller Home of Lynchburg Virginia
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New River Community Action Inc; the most unlike its peers is Radford Sch Brd-King Award Ta. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
16/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $2,313,637 · OtherNEW RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INCRADFORD UNIVERSITY: $1,050,000 · OtherRADFORD UNIVERSITYFree Clinic of Pulaski County Inc: $509,325 · OtherFree Clinic of Pulaski County IncFree Clinic of the New River Valley Inc: $217,000 · Other+13 more: $322,323 · Other+13 moreEDWARD VIA VIRGINIA COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE: $2,312,000 · EducationEDWARD VIA VIRGINIA COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MED…RADFORD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,360,000 · EducationRADFORD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCWOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF THE NEW RIVER VALLEY INC: $330,000 · Human ServicesFLOYD COUNTY CARES INC: $184,000 · Human ServicesPulaski Adult Day Service & Fall Prevention Center: $85,000 · Human ServicesMONTGOMERY COUNTY CHRISTMAS STORE: $50,000 · Human ServicesAGAPE CENTER CORPORATION INC: $27,500 · Human ServicesPlenty Inc: $74,000 · Food & NutritionVITTLES FOR VETS: $53,334 · Food & NutritionThe Community Foundation of the New River Valley Inc: $44,333 · PhilanthropyCHILDREN'S TRUST FOUNDATION ROANOKE VALLEY INC: $30,000 · Crime & LegalNEW RIVER VALLEY CHILD ADVOCACY RESOURCES EDUCATION & SERVICES: $10,000 · Crime & LegalCarilion Clinic Foundation: $17,314 · HealthCarilion New River Valley Medical Center: $10,000 · HealthLanto Griffin Foundation: $14,000 · Youth DevelopmentIMAGINATION LIBRARY OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY: $10,000 · Youth Development
Other$4,412,285Education$3,672,000Human Services$676,500Food & Nutrition$127,334Philanthropy$44,333Crime & Legal$40,000Health$27,314Youth Development$24,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $2,313,637 over 5y, 26% of budgetEDWARD VIA VIRGINIA COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE: $2,312,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetRADFORD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,360,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetFree Clinic of Pulaski County Inc: $509,325 over 7y, 13% of budgetWOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF THE NEW RIVER VALLEY INC: $330,000 over 7y, 4.6% of budgetFree Clinic of the New River Valley Inc: $217,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetPulaski Adult Day Service & Fall Prevention Center: $85,000 over 5y, 20% of budgetPlenty Inc: $74,000 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetVITTLES FOR VETS: $53,334 over 1y, 30% of budgetMONTGOMERY COUNTY CHRISTMAS STORE: $50,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetThe Community Foundation of the New River Valley Inc: $44,333 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S TRUST FOUNDATION ROANOKE VALLEY INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetAGAPE CENTER CORPORATION INC: $27,500 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetMONTGOMERY MUSEUM & LEWIS MILLER ART CTR: $24,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetNEW RIVER COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCarilion Clinic Foundation: $17,314 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDEPAUL COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLanto Griffin Foundation: $14,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetNEW RIVER VALLEY CHILD ADVOCACY RESOURCES EDUCATION & SERVICES: $10,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetCarilion New River Valley Medical Center: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIMAGINATION LIBRARY OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY: $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…C E Richardson Benevo…Community Foundation …Celanese FoundationCarilion New River Va…Lyerly FoundationThe Carter and Kay Cr…Randolph House of Pul…Bauers-Wall Family Fo…Mightycause Charitabl…Corning Incorporated …Ge Aerospace Foundati…
The Community Foundation of the New River Valley IncVA34.7× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of the New River Valley Inc · C E Richardson Benevolent Foundation · Community Foundation Serving Western Virginia · Celanese Foundation · Carilion New River Valley Medical Center · Lyerly Foundation · The Carter and Kay Craigie Family Foundation · Randolph House of Pulaski Found · Bauers-Wall Family Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Corning Incorporated Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization New River Valley Health Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from New River Valley Health Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on New River Valley Health’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home