· Public charity
Carilion New River Valley Medical Center
Our mission is to improve the health of the communities we serve through our commitment to a common purpose of better patient care, better community health, and lower cost.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 4 grants below total $169,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $203,815 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $34,815 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $49k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $115k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Radford University Foundation | $115,000 |
| Virginia Tech Foundation Inc | $33,500 |
| Blacksburg Country Club Chtble Fdn | $15,000 |
| NRV Cares | $5,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- VNVIRGINIA'S NEW RIVER VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE INC6× · 2017–2023 · $135k · revenue +54%
- EVEDWARD VIA VIRGINIA COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE4× · 2017–2023 · $133k · revenue +83%
- NRNEW RIVER VALLEY CHILD ADVOCACY RESOURCES EDUCATION & SERVICES7× · 2017–2024 · $51k · revenue +20%
Funded once
- (A(4) Alliance for Better Childcare Strategiesone grant, 2019 · $18k
- NRNEW RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $13k · revenue +45%
- CCCALFEE COMMUNITY CENTER AND CULTURAL CENTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +307%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
VCDF provides alternative financing and technical assistance to real estate developers engaged in the creation or preservation of affordable housing, community development, and economic development projects throughout our service areas of…
Vipc grows and diversifies virginia's economy by investing in and accelerating innovation commercialization and entrepreneurship.
New schools for virginia works with parents, students, educators and the community to improve educational outcomes by designing new schools and by supporting existing schools to improve outcomes.
The foundation determines the patentability and obtains patents on virginia commonwealth university (vcu) inventions and markets and licenses such inventions to commerical entities. the foundation's activities promote research efforts at…
The mission of vt-arc is to extend the impact of the virginia tech research and innovation enterprise, delivering superior analytic and technology solutions to government and non-government customers.
Solicitation of public contributions on behalf of member colleges. provides foundations, businesses, and individuals a convenient way of supporting small colleges and universities in virginia.
To assist rural virginians in developing and advancing their agricultural, economic and social interests to enhance their quality of life.
To foster and support research at west virginia university (wvu) and to provide evaluation, development, patenting, management and marketing services for inventions by the faculty, staff, and students of wvu.
Vecf is the non-partisan steward of virginia's promise for early childhood success.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New River Valley Child Advocacy Resources Education & Services and the most unlike its peers is Radford Child Development Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RADFORD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA'S NEW RIVER VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds EDWARD VIA VIRGINIA COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds BLACKSBURG COUNTRY CLUB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds The Community Foundation of the New River Valley Inc ↗
- Who funds NEW RIVER VALLEY CHILD ADVOCACY RESOURCES EDUCATION & SERVICES ↗
- Who funds NEW RIVER VALLEY SENIOR SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds RADFORD CHILD DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds EO COMPANIES ↗
- Who funds Plenty Inc ↗
- Who funds NEW RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CALFEE COMMUNITY CENTER AND CULTURAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC OF THE NEW RIVE ↗
- Who funds THE BLACKSBURG PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of the New River Valley Inc · New River Valley Health Foundation · C E Richardson Benevolent Foundation · Celanese Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Carilion New River Valley Medical Center funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.