Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bauers-Wall Family Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

Food & Nutrition$14kHuman Services$11kAnimals$11kArts & Culture$10kYouth Development$8kEducation$8kCivil Rights$4kHousing & Shelter$4kOther$0
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PARTNERSHIP FOR FLOYD$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%JUNE BUG CENTER INC: $3k → 12%JUNE BUG CENTER INC: $3k → 12%JUNE BUG CENTER INC: $1k → 12%JUNE BUG CENTER INC: $1k → 12%FLOYD FRIENDS OF ASYLUM SEEKERS: $1k → 12%FLOYD COUNTY CARES: $300 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$73k · 15 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +140% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2022, 14 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
10

Total granted

$73k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+140%
+34%

Still filing today

67%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureEnvironmentFood & NutritionAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PI
    Plenty Inc
    4× · 2017–2020 · $14k · revenue +140%
  • NR
    NEW RIVER COMMUNITY ACTION INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $9k · revenue +58%
  • TJ
    The June Bug Center Inc
    4× · 2017–2020 · $8k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • NR
    NEW RIVER LAND TRUST
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue -53%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • TS
    The Spikenard Farm Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +39%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Floyds Fork Conservancy Inc
Environment
2
Floyd County Rescue Squad

To save lives and protect citizen by providing ground and water recovery and rescue as well as extrication services

3
Floyd County Historical Museum

To preserve the history of the region

Arts & Culture
4
Bristow Barnyard Farm and Domestic Animal Rescue
Animals
5
New River Valley Montessori Corporation

Our mission is to unlock the potential of each child through individualized, broad-based education. We want to give children the means and opportunities with which to become well-rounded self-motivat

Education
6
Homebound Farm & Rescue
Animals
7
Rome Floyd County Humane Society

Dedicated to providing for the welfare of animals in the rome/floyd county area.

Animals
8
Floyd Service Project Inc
Housing & Shelter
9
Davidson County Local Food Network

Building a community food system.

Food & Nutrition
10
Floyd County 4-H Corp Inc

To provide support of youth and adult agriculture programs.

11
Floyd Felines Inc

animal rescue

Animals
12
Local Food Hub Inc

Local food hub is a nonprofit organization that partners with virginia farmers to increase community access to local food

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Floyd County Life Saving & First Aid Squad Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is The June Bug Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NEW RIVER COMMUNITY ACTION INC — $9,000 · OtherNEW RIVER COMMUNITY ACTION INCTRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $4,000 · OtherTRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INCIndividual grant recipient — $4,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPARTNERSHIP FOR FLOYD INC — $3,750 · OtherPARTNERSHIP FOR FLOYD INCVIRGINIA BLUE RIDGE MUSIC FESTIVAL — $1,800 · OtherVIRGINIA BLUE RIDGE MUSIC FESTIVALFLOYD COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $1,500 · OtherOLD CHURCH GALLERY LTD — $1,500 · OtherSUSTAIN FLOYD FOUNDATION INC — $1,750 · OtherSUSTAIN FLOYD FOUNDATION INCTHE FLOYD COUNTY LIFE SAVING & FIRST AID SQUAD INCORPORATED — $1,500 · Other+6 more — $3,200 · Other+6 morePlenty Inc — $14,000 · Food & NutritionPlenty IncHANDMADE MUSIC SCHOOL — $8,000 · Arts & CultureHANDMADE MUSIC SCH…Floyd Community Center for the Arts — $5,500 · Arts & CultureFloyd Community Ce…The June Bug Center Inc — $8,000 · Human ServicesThe June Bug …FLOYD FRIENDS OF ASYLUM SEEKERS INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesFLOYD FRIENDS…+1 more — $300 · Human ServicesSpringhouse Community School — $7,000 · EducationSpringhous…Blue Mountain School Incorporated — $250 · EducationNEW RIVER LAND TRUST — $2,000 · EnvironmentThe Spikenard Farm Inc — $1,000 · EnvironmentFloyd County Humane Society Inc — $1,750 · Animals
Other$32,000Food & Nutrition$14,000Arts & Culture$13,500Human Services$9,300Education$7,250Environment$3,000Animals$1,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPlenty Inc — $14,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetNEW RIVER COMMUNITY ACTION INC — $9,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetThe June Bug Center Inc — $8,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetHANDMADE MUSIC SCHOOL — $8,000 over 3y, 7.7% of budgetSpringhouse Community School — $7,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetFloyd Community Center for the Arts — $5,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $4,000 over 3y, 9.7% of budgetNEW RIVER LAND TRUST — $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFloyd County Humane Society Inc — $1,750 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetThe Spikenard Farm Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFLOYD FRIENDS OF ASYLUM SEEKERS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetThe Community Foundation of the New River Valley Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLOYD COUNTY CARES INC — $300 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBlue Mountain School Incorporated — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of the New River Valley IncVA26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of the New River Valley Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Community Foundation Serving Western Virginia · Jewish Communal Fund · Tides Foundation · New River Valley Health Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bauers-Wall Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph