Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lyerly Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$719k
Granted FY2023
34
Grants FY2023
12
States reached
$500k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

71% of Lyerly Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Virginia Tech Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 18 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Lyerly Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 21 organizations, $719k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

14
17
13
19
16
20
20
21
20
22
21
23
14
24
18
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$2.4MScience & Tech$252kFood & Nutrition$98kReligion$90kHuman Services$73kArts & Culture$53kHealth$46kInternational$44kOther$0
02FY2023 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k28 grants · $51k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $63k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $105k
  • $250k+1 grant · $500k
$1,500
Median grant
12
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SALEM ACADEMY & COLLEGE$500,000
VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC$105,000
UNC ARTS AND SCIENCES FOUNDTION INC - LYERLY STUDENT FUND$26,000
PRESBYTERIAN MISSION$17,000
RADFORD CITY SCHOOLS - PARTNERS FOR EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION INC$10,100
FEEDING AMERICA SOUTHWEST VA$10,000
RADFORD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$5,000
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF TROPICAL MEDICINE & HYGIENE$5,000
RADFORD FAIRLAWN DAILY BREAD$5,000
SCIENCE MUSEUM OF WESTERN VIRGINIA$5,000
HEIFER INTERNATIONAL$5,000
BEANS AND RICE$5,000
GLENCOE MUSEUM$2,500
RADFORD ELF SHELF$2,500
RADFORD CLOTHING BANK$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%HUMANKIND: $1k → 8%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME OF THE HIGHLANDS: $1k → 16%HUMANKIND: $1k → 8%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME OF THE HIGHLANDS: $1k → 16%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME OF THE HIGHLANDS: $1k → 16%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME OF THE HIGHLANDS: $1k → 16%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME OF THE HIGHLANDS: $1k → 16%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDERN'S HOME OF THE HIGHLANDS INC: $1k → 16%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME OF THE HIGHLANDS: $1k → 16%BEANS AND RICE: $5k → 14%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME OF THE HIGHLANDS: $500 → 16%SAINT FRANCIS SERVICE DOGS: $1k → 8%BEANS AND RICE: $5k → 14%SAINT FRANCIS SERVICE DOGS: $500 → 8%BEANS AND RICE: $1k → 14%SAINT FRANCIS SERVICE DOGS: $500 → 8%BEANS AND RICE: $1k → 14%SAINT FRANCIS SERVICE DOGS: $500 → 8%BEANS AND RICE: $1k → 14%SAINT FRANCIS SERVICE DOGS: $500 → 8%SAINT FRANCIS SERVICE DOGS: $500 → 8%SAINT FRANCIS SERVICE DOGS: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NY
IN
OH
PA
RI
KY
WV
VA
MD
AR
TN
NC
SC
OK
LA
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.3M · 44 repeat orgs$111k to everyone else

44 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2023, 17 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
16

Total granted

$2.3M
$89k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+84%

Still filing today

52%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationFood & NutritionInternationalPhilanthropyHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SALEM ACADEMY AND COLLEGE
    4× · 2020–2024 · $545k · revenue +14%
  • TV
    THE VIRGINIA BIOSCIENCE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $201k · revenue +870%
  • RC
    RADFORD CITY SCHOOLS PARTNERS FOR EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $138k · revenue +7% · 89% of their budget

Funded once

  • RU
    RADFORD UNIVERSITY BIOLOGY SPEAKER FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL H ARTS & SCIENCES FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue -23%
  • BB
    BOBCAT BACKPACKS PROGRAM
    one grant, 2019 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Virginia Commonwealth University Intellectual Property Foundation

The foundation determines the patentability and obtains patents on virginia commonwealth university (vcu) inventions and markets and licenses such inventions to commerical entities. the foundation's activities promote research efforts at…

Health
2
Virginia Foundation for Agriculture Innovation and Rural Sustainability

To assist rural virginians in developing and advancing their agricultural, economic and social interests to enhance their quality of life.

Environment
3
The Virginia College Fund

Solicitation of public contributions on behalf of member colleges. provides foundations, businesses, and individuals a convenient way of supporting small colleges and universities in virginia.

Education
4
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
5
University of Virginia Law School Foundation

The university of virginia law school foundation's primary purpose is to receive, manage and expend funds for the benefit of the university of virginia school of law.

Education
6
The Rand Corporation

Help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis.

Public Benefit
7
Jefferson Scholars Foundation

The jefferson scholars foundation (foundation) provides academic merit-based scholarship, fellowship and professorship support to students and faculty at the university of virginia (uva).

Philanthropy
8
Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research

Foundation for food and agriculture research connects funders, researchers and farmers through public-private partnerships to support audacious research addressing the biggest food and agriculture challenges.

Food & Nutrition
9
West Virginia University Research Corporation

To foster and support research at west virginia university (wvu) and to provide evaluation, development, patenting, management and marketing services for inventions by the faculty, staff, and students of wvu.

Education
10
Medical College of Va Foundation

To support and foster vcu health and vcu health sciences through philanthropy, stewardship, innovation, communication, and collaboration.

Education
11
Virginia Tech Applied Research Corporation

The mission of vt-arc is to extend the impact of the virginia tech research and innovation enterprise, delivering superior analytic and technology solutions to government and non-government customers.

Science & Tech
12
Vcu Investment Management Company

To provide investment and investment management and related services to the rector and the board of visitors of virginia commonwealth university (vcu), and/or to the private and independent foundations and other entities affiliated with…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding Southwest Virginia and the most unlike its peers is Radford Elf Shelf Inc Radford Elf Shelf Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Public University Foundatio…Land Conservation Organizat…Cancer Support OrganizationsUrban Agriculture & Food Ac…Elementary Literacy TutoringClassical Music EnsemblesCommunity FoundationsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Child and Family ServicesCommunity Arts OrganizationsFood Pantries & Assistance
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 53 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr18%8%10–20yr14%13%20–35yr15%29%35–55yr15%46%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr18%9%10–20yr14%3%20–35yr15%30%35–55yr15%59%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/40
the rest of the field
13%
6,446/50,428

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/38
Grantees still filing
30/38
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC — $707,850 · EducationVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INCSALEM ACADEMY AND COLLEGE — $545,000 · EducationSALEM ACADEMY AND COLLEGERADFORD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $533,000 · EducationRADFORD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCRADFORD CITY SCHOOLS PARTNERS FOR EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION INC — $137,750 · EducationRADFORD CITY SCHOOLS PARTNERS FOR EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION INC+2 more — $22,000 · EducationUNC ARTS AND SCIENCES FOUNDTION INC - LYERLY STUDENT FUND — $226,000 · OtherUNC ARTS AND SCIENCES FOUNDT…NEW RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $105,000 · OtherNEW RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE …NEW RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $105,000 · OtherNEW RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE …PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF RADFORD — $60,000 · OtherPRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF RADFO…RADFORD UNIVERSITY BIOLOGY SPEAKER FUND — $50,000 · OtherRADFORD UNIVERSITY BIOLOGY S…UNC - LYERLY STUDENT FUND — $40,000 · OtherHEIFER INTERNATIONAL — $30,095 · Other+49 more — $176,000 · Other+49 moreTHE VIRGINIA BIOSCIENCE FOUNDATION — $201,000 · Science & Tech+1 more — $500 · Science & TechFEEDING SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA — $54,104 · Food & NutritionRADFORD FAIRLAWN DAILY BREAD — $41,200 · Food & Nutrition+1 more — $500 · Food & NutritionRADFORD ELF SHELF INC RADFORD ELF SHELF INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesBeans and Rice Inc — $13,000 · Human ServicesPRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME OF THE HIGHLANDS INC — $7,510 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF THE NEW RIVER VALLEY INC — $5,074 · Human ServicesSAINT FRANCIS SERVICE DOGS — $4,000 · Human ServicesPRESBYTERIAN HOMES & FAMILY SVCS — $2,000 · Human ServicesSCIENCE MUSEUM OF WESTERN VIRGINIA — $30,150 · Arts & CultureBlacksburg Master Chorale — $1,269 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN SOCIETY OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE — $21,000 · HealthPeggy Lillis Foundation — $1,000 · Health+1 more — $100 · Health
Education$1,945,600Other$792,095Science & Tech$201,500Food & Nutrition$95,804Human Services$46,584Arts & Culture$31,419Health$22,100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC — $707,850 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSALEM ACADEMY AND COLLEGE — $545,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetRADFORD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $533,000 over 5y, 5.6% of budgetRADFORD CITY SCHOOLS PARTNERS FOR EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION INC — $137,750 over 5y, 89% of budgetNEW RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $105,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetFEEDING SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA — $54,104 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetRADFORD FAIRLAWN DAILY BREAD — $41,200 over 7y, 8.4% of budgetSCIENCE MUSEUM OF WESTERN VIRGINIA — $30,150 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE — $21,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL H ARTS & SCIENCES FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRADFORD ELF SHELF INC RADFORD ELF SHELF INC — $15,000 over 8y, 6.2% of budgetBeans and Rice Inc — $13,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetRadford Clothing Bank — $11,750 over 7y, 7.5% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME OF THE HIGHLANDS INC — $7,510 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC — $7,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF THE NEW RIVER VALLEY INC — $5,074 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe Community Foundation of the New River Valley Inc — $4,679 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSAINT FRANCIS SERVICE DOGS — $4,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICABLUE RIDGE MOUNTAINS COUNCIL — $3,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWest Virginia Highlands Conservancy Inc — $2,116 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC — $2,057 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN HOMES & FAMILY SVCS — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRADFORD HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetBlacksburg Master Chorale — $1,269 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL CHILD SAFETY COUNCIL — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIGHTYCAUSE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Spikenard Farm Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOGS FOR THE CAUSE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGORDON RESEARCH CONFERENCES INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKGREEN GARDENS — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION — $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds SALEM ACADEMY AND COLLEGE
  • Who funds RADFORD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE VIRGINIA BIOSCIENCE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds RADFORD CITY SCHOOLS PARTNERS FOR EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds NEW RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds FEEDING SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA
  • Who funds RADFORD FAIRLAWN DAILY BREAD
  • Who funds SCIENCE MUSEUM OF WESTERN VIRGINIA
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL H ARTS & SCIENCES FOUNDATION
  • Who funds RADFORD ELF SHELF INC RADFORD ELF SHELF INC
  • Who funds Beans and Rice Inc
  • Who funds Radford Clothing Bank
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME OF THE HIGHLANDS INC
  • Who funds CHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC
  • Who funds WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF THE NEW RIVER VALLEY INC
  • Who funds The Community Foundation of the New River Valley Inc
  • Who funds SAINT FRANCIS SERVICE DOGS
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICABLUE RIDGE MOUNTAINS COUNCIL

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of the New River Valley IncVA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of the New River Valley Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · New River Valley Health Foundation · Community Foundation Serving Western Virginia · Celanese Foundation · United Way of Southwest Virginia Inc · C E Richardson Benevolent Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Winston-Salem Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Charities Aid Foundation America

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lyerly Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Feed the Children Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 78 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph